View Single Post
Old 08-30-2012, 05:51 PM   #12
MIJB#19
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Maassluis, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by gstelmack View Post
The Draft Value chart is a waste of time for FOF, unless heavily modified. I posted something once that went like:

1-1: 500,000
1-2: 450,000
1-3: 400,000
1-4: 200,000
1-5: 100,000
1-6: 50,000
1-7: 25,000
1-8: 12,500
1-9: 10,000
1-10: 7,500
1-11: 6,000
1-12: 5,000
1-13: 4,000
1-14: 3,000
1-15: 2,000
1-16: 1,000
1-17: 500
1-18: 450
...
1-32: 100
2-1: 95
2-2: 90
...
2-32: 10
Round 3: 5 points
Round 4-7: 1 point
If you're going for the extremes, I suggest you should decrease the value of #3 and #6 and increase that of picks 4 and 7, the latter are much more cap friendly in their salary requests. I think it applies at one more spot in the draft, once I posted that research at the WOOF forum (I tried to go dig it up, but the WOOF forum seems to be down at the moment).

But your overall point makes sense, the listed values are out of line with their true values these days, I came to that realization in the latest IHOF draft.
__________________
* 2005 Golden Scribe winner for best FOF Dynasty about IHOF's Maassluis Merchantmen
* Former GM of GEFL's Houston Oilers and WOOF's Curacao Cocktail

Last edited by MIJB#19 : 08-30-2012 at 05:56 PM.
MIJB#19 is offline   Reply With Quote