Quote:
Originally Posted by nol
Wow, you just took "you don't need to shoot and kill an unarmed suspect who is not wanted for multiple counts of murder and domestic terrorism," and twisted it into "he's pure and innocent." Thanks for playing the false equivalence game.
|
Someone needs to be armed and/or wanted for multiple counts of murder and domestic terrorism to pose a lethal threat?
Was I wrong for interpreting your posts to infer that since the suspects in the movie theater and Boston bombing were captured alive that the police could not possibly have justification for shooting this teenager?