Quote:
Originally Posted by nol
No, that sort of character evidence would not be admissible in Darren Wilson's trial.
|
It will if we're establishing why he attacked the officer who then fired in self-defense.
edit to add: Thinking he was about to go down on the robbery provides motive for an otherwise random assault. Hypothetically speaking, since right now we're talking about a hypothetical trial anyway.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis
Last edited by JonInMiddleGA : 08-15-2014 at 03:53 PM.
|