Home

Pacquiao-Marquez IV: December 8, 2012

This is a discussion on Pacquiao-Marquez IV: December 8, 2012 within the Boxing forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Combat Sports > Boxing
MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-15-2012, 04:07 AM   #1
My Momma's Son
 
bigeastbumrush's Arena
 
OVR: 37
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,246
Icon8 Pacquiao-Marquez IV: December 8, 2012

HBO PPV
Quote:
Pacquiao picked Marquez because the money was bigger, Arum told ESPN.com on Friday.

Arum said he is guaranteeing Pacquiao $23 million for the fight. Had he faced Bradley again, it would have been "considerably less," according to Arum, who declined to reveal the figure.

"Because the economics for the Marquez fight were so much greater than for a Bradley rematch, that is what Manny decided to do," Arum said. "It's so much greater because of the support Marquez has from the Hispanic community. Look at the past numbers. When Pacquiao fought Marquez (in November), it sold close to 1.3 million pay-per-view. Bradley was about 900,000. That's a big difference. Plus, the gate goes from probably $8 million to $12 million."

Freddie Roach, Pacquiao's trainer, said once Cotto turned down an offer, he preferred for Pacquiao to fight Bradley again.

"Manny knew I would prefer Bradley," Roach said. "I think the money was a huge factor. Bradley doesn't bring the people Marquez does. But I would have rather had revenge for that bad decision in June."
*facepalm*


-What happened to Bradley-Pacquiao II?

-Does Mayweather get a shot at Bradley first fresh out of jail?

-Does Bradley fight a much bigger Cotto setting up PBF/PAC vs. Cotto II?

-How does Arum continue to hoodwink the states for these fights? PAC/Marquez is a bigger draw than PAC/Bradley II but the rematch shouldn't be skipped to have these guys fight a fourth time.

-As good of a salesman he is...there is no angle whatsoever for PBF to try to hype PBF vs. Bradley. That fight would be a joke of a contest and even the most casual of boxing fans know this.

What happened to this once great sport? It is a circus act between the 2 main promoters and nothing more.
bigeastbumrush is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 09-15-2012, 05:36 AM   #2
Pro
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Aug 2012
Re: Pacquiao-Marquez IV: December 8, 2012

I am a Money guy but I commend Pac for not fighting Bradley again. He absolutely beat Bradley and the only one that benefits from that rematch is Bradley's bank account. That is a step in the right direction for boxing.

I truly believe Money-Pac will happen in May.
Dos_Santos is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2012, 10:48 AM   #3
(aka Alberto)
 
aholbert32's Arena
 
OVR: 44
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 33,173
Blog Entries: 8
Re: Pacquiao-Marquez IV: December 8, 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigeastbumrush
HBO PPV

*facepalm*


-What happened to Bradley-Pacquiao II?

-Does Mayweather get a shot at Bradley first fresh out of jail?

-Does Bradley fight a much bigger Cotto setting up PBF/PAC vs. Cotto II?

-How does Arum continue to hoodwink the states for these fights? PAC/Marquez is a bigger draw than PAC/Bradley II but the rematch shouldn't be skipped to have these guys fight a fourth time.

-As good of a salesman he is...there is no angle whatsoever for PBF to try to hype PBF vs. Bradley. That fight would be a joke of a contest and even the most casual of boxing fans know this.

What happened to this once great sport? It is a circus act between the 2 main promoters and nothing more.
Bradley/Pac 2 is dead.

Mayweather isnt planning to fight again this year.

Cotto is fighting in December against Austin Trout so no fight against Bradley.

Bradley is fighting an undetermined opponent in December in NY.

I dont know what you mean by hoodwink a state or what that would have to do with determining who fights who. Promoters and Sanctioning Bodies make the fights. If Arum and Pac want to do a Fourth Marquez fight, its their call. Also the state of Nevada will be more than happy to take the revenue generated from a Pac/Marquez fight.
aholbert32 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2012, 03:23 PM   #4
All Star
 
OVR: 13
Join Date: Feb 2004
Re: Pacquiao-Marquez IV: December 8, 2012

Not interested. PPV? Hilarious. Boxing has fallen, and will never get up...
pietasterp is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2012, 03:54 PM   #5
Pro
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Aug 2012
Re: Pacquiao-Marquez IV: December 8, 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by pietasterp
Not interested. PPV? Hilarious. Boxing has fallen, and will never get up...

Boxing has a ton of issues but still drives crazy money. To even dispute this is tantamount to trolling.

To say it will never get up or is at a point where it is completely down is laughable and uniformed.
Dos_Santos is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 09-15-2012, 04:54 PM   #6
(aka Alberto)
 
aholbert32's Arena
 
OVR: 44
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 33,173
Blog Entries: 8
Re: Pacquiao-Marquez IV: December 8, 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by pietasterp
Not interested. PPV? Hilarious. Boxing has fallen, and will never get up...
Without you this fight will still hit a million buys.
aholbert32 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2012, 06:55 PM   #7
Hall Of Fame
 
JayBee74's Arena
 
OVR: 36
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gretna, Louisiana
Posts: 23,004
Re: Pacquiao-Marquez IV: December 8, 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by pietasterp
Not interested. PPV? Hilarious. Boxing has fallen, and will never get up...
Not interested either, mainly because I never was a big Pac fan. Marquez again?-enough already.

There are a lot of other fights I'd like to see though, including tonight's. Why post in this forum if you don't like boxing?
JayBee74 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2012, 02:02 AM   #8
Pro
 
OVR: 9
Join Date: Feb 2003
Re: Pacquiao-Marquez IV: December 8, 2012

__________________
"This game, and series, has nothing but contempt for you (now)"
BOSsTOwN is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Combat Sports > Boxing »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 AM.
Top -