We all know the deal with legends that aren't apart of the retired legends league etc...
And Michael charges an arm and a leg so producers can't get their company to dish out the ridiculous amounts.
So my question is, are we satisfied with the fact that the greatest players and PLAYER will never grace new generation games and into the future?
Why are certain legends and MJ so resistant to licensing their name and person to video games?
The NBA prides itself on the history of the league and honors legends every year. Why are the games putting legends and historic moments at the back of the priority list?
You put Michael Jordan in a game and you get customers that aren't real sports fanatics but just know the name and the legend that comes with it, buying your game.
What gives?
And Michael charges an arm and a leg so producers can't get their company to dish out the ridiculous amounts.
So my question is, are we satisfied with the fact that the greatest players and PLAYER will never grace new generation games and into the future?
Why are certain legends and MJ so resistant to licensing their name and person to video games?
The NBA prides itself on the history of the league and honors legends every year. Why are the games putting legends and historic moments at the back of the priority list?
You put Michael Jordan in a game and you get customers that aren't real sports fanatics but just know the name and the legend that comes with it, buying your game.
What gives?
Comment