Purple's edited rosters for the 2013 season with NCAA12

[Purplepower_NC]

Quote: Originally Posted by KingV2k3

I tend to agree... Purple: Do you have a link to that thread / post where you outline how to edit incoming recruits to match the gameplay of the guys included in your roster? My bad: Found it: http://www.operationsports.com/forum...ter-guide.html Prob outdated tho, correct? Also: Not sure if you want to mess with coaches, but this thread has some nice run / pass percentages that help with both played and simmed games: http://www.operationsports.com/forum...er-update.html Looking VERY forward to the 2012 for NCAA12 set! Continued thanks!

Thanks King as always. As of now....sort of trying something new with the rating, until I can get the Rosters named....mostly been testing with some new ratings to divide the has vs the has nots. For instance toying around with ratings in the 40's 50's for teams such as Akron (ranked 119) with only a couple of potential playmakers. With 70 being the middle of the pack teams.

Again....just toying with these and testings with some help form a couple of guys. We sort of wanted to get away from how EA has everyone rated in the 70's....no matter how bad the team is. You will still have the truly All-American types...and elite teams. Hopefully this comes together and will give outstanding results.

[illwillp44]

Can you give the players more speed last years there were guys that had 90+speed at like 84. Most of the players that play CB or WR should be 86 and up no matter the team, even the small teams have WR's and Corners with 90 speed, not all of them, but some. Please take this in consideration, thanks.

[Purplepower_NC]

Quote: Originally Posted by illwillp44

Can you give the players more speed last years there were guys that had 90+speed at like 84. Most of the players that play CB or WR should be 86 and up no matter the team, even the small teams have WR's and Corners with 90 speed, not all of them, but some. Please take this in consideration, thanks.

No....reason is I used the times from draftscout and crossed with the chart that Yuman (I think) provided. So...last year if a guy ran a 4.34...he comes in at a 93, The way EA rates players there are at least 8 guys with 90 plus speed on most teams. If you have your ratings on the other skills on par ...you don't need 93 that in real life ran a 4.48 = 87, but EA thinks he needs to be an 93 or so. CB's are the same. If you have he man/zone skills plus pursuit, play rec....then he doesn't need to be a 90+ speed CB to get the job done.

This is where coaching comes in. Say, you do come up against a very very fast WR with speed in the low 90's. And you have this CB with speed in the low 80s, but very good coverage skills. Do you try to let him go one on one, or give him help over the top most of the game. The way EA has it....no matter the WR/CB...there speeds are just about the same across the board.

[CrimsonCrush396]

Purp can you tell me how you rate players? I mean obviously good players will get 90 scores but I mean how do I you know how to grade them in each level like for a RB their receiving, blocking etc. or a QB's strength/accuracy. I'm asking cause I'm making 05' Bama squad and I want to be as accurate as possible. Thanks dude

[LeonM]

Any update on these edited rosters?

[Purplepower_NC]

working on them

[pistonica]

Quote: Originally Posted by Purplepower_NC

working on them

when can we expect these rosters to be ready to download?...

[WinMINTwins]

Quote: Originally Posted by pistonica

when can we expect these rosters to be ready to download?...

I'm pretty sure he's said they're done when they're done...