EVERY TEAMS DECADE RECORD AND WINNING PERCENTAGE.....(2001-2010)

[franch1se]

Quote: Originally Posted by SlickRick11

RANKING EVERY TEAM BY THEIR WINNING PERCENTAGE OVER THE LAST DECADE..... (2001-2010) BOISE ST. 114-16 (.876) OHIO ST. 106-22 (.828) TEXAS 106-23 (.821) USC 105-24 (.813) OKLAHOMA 109-26 (.807) TCU 98-27 (.784) LSU 102-29 (.778) FLORIDA 98-32 (.753) VIRGINIA TECH 99-34 (.744) UTAH 92-32 (.741) GEORGIA 96-34 (.738) AUBURN 93-35 (.726) OREGON 89-37 (.706) MIAMI (FL) 88-38 (.698) WEST VIRGINIA 88-38 (.698) BOSTON COLLEGE 88-41 (.682) WISCONSIN 88-41 (.682) IOWA 85-41 (.674) TEXAS TECH 86-42 (.671) ALABAMA 86-43 (.667) HAWAII 87-46 (.654) BYU 82-44 (.650) LOUISVILLE 81-44 (.648) FLORIDA ST. 84-46 (.646) NEBRASKA 84-46 (.646) PENN ST. 79-45 (.637) TENNESSEE 81-47 (.632) MICHIGAN 79-46 (.632) SOUTH FLORIDA 76-45 (.628) FRESNO ST. 82-49 (.625) MISSOURI 77-49 (.611) PITTSBURGH 75-49 (.604) GEORGIA TECH 78-52 (.600) MARYLAND 75-50 (.600) OKLAHOMA ST. 75-50 (.600) CLEMSON 76-51 (.598) ARKANSAS 75-51 (.595) CINCINNATI 75-51 (.595) OREGON ST. 74-51 (.592) NORTHERN ILLINOIS 73-51 (.588) CALIFORNIA 73-52 (.584) SOUTHERN MISS 74-53 (.582) NAVY 72-53 (.576) BOWLING GREEN 70-52 (.573) TOLEDO 71-53 (.572) TROY 69-53 (.565) NEVADA 70-55 (.560) NOTRE DAME 69-54 (.560) SOUTH CAROLINA 69-55 (.556) AIR FORCE 68-55 (.552) CONNECTICUT 67-55 (.549) KANSAS ST. 67-57 (.540) MICHIGAN ST. 66-58 (.532) NORTH CAROLINA ST. 66-58 (.532) ARIZONA ST. 65-58 (.528) TEXAS A&M 65-58 (.528) TULSA 67-60 (.527) UCLA 65-59 (.524) MARSHALL 64-58 (.524) PURDUE 63-61 (.508) VIRGINIA 63-61 (.508) WAKE FOREST 62-60 (.508) MIAMI (OHIO) 63-62 (.504) HOUSTON 62-63 (.496) OLE MISS 60-61 (.495) CENTRAL FLORIDA 61-63 (.491) CENTRAL MICHIGAN 61-63 (.491) NORTHWESTERN 60-63 (.487) RUTGERS 59-63 (.483) MIDDLE TENN. ST. 58-62 (.483) COLORADO 60-66 (.476) MINNESOTA 59-65 (.475) FLORIDA ATLANTIC 40-45 (.470) KANSAS 56-65 (.462) WESTERN MICHIGAN 55-64 (.462) STANFORD 54-64 (.457) EAST CAROLINA 57-68 (.456) WASHINGTON ST. 55-66 (.454) NEW MEXICO 55-68 (.447) NORTH CAROLINA 55-68 (.447) LOUISIANA TECH 54-67 (.446) KENTUCKY 54-68 (.442) COLORADO ST. 54-69 (.439) ARIZONA 51-69 (.425) BALL ST. 51-69 (.425) OHIO 51-71 (.418) IOWA ST. 51-72 (.414) MEMPHIS 50-72 (.409) SYRACUSE 48-73 (.396) ARKANSAS ST. 47-72 (.394) RICE 47-72 (.394) ILLINOIS 47-73 (.391) UAB 46-72 (.389) AKRON 46-73 (.386) UTEP 46-75 (.380) LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE 44-73 (.376) WASHINGTON 45-76 (.371) WYOMING 44-75 (.369) SAN DIEGO ST. 44-76 (.367) KENT. ST. 43-74 (.367) MISSISSIPPI ST. 43-76 (.361) LOUISIANA MONROE 41-76 (.350) NORTH TEXAS 42-79 (.347) INDIANA 41-77 (.347) TULANE 40-79 (.336) SAN JOSE ST. 40-80 (.333) BAYLOR 39-79 (.330) TEMPLE 38-80 (.322) SMU 38-82 (.316) NEW MEXICO ST. 36-85 (.297) UNLV 35-83 (.296) FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL 24-58 (.292) VANDERBILT 33-85 (.279) IDAHO 32-88 (.267) ARMY 31-88 (.260) UTAH ST. 30-86 (.258) BUFFALO 30-89 (.252) WESTERN KENTUCKY 11-37 (.229) EASTERN MICHIGAN 26-91 (.222) DUKE 22-95 (.188)

There are the splits imo. I didn't realize Arizona was that bad. I realize the split between the top and middle have some similar records but in terms of prestige and jumping from school to school I threw some of them into the middle programs.

[SlickRick11]

its a little bit deceiving because you also have to take in consideration what conference that team is in...... teams like duke and miss. st. are by no means the worst teams in college football but have are in tough conferences

[playguitar90]

Quote: Originally Posted by SlickRick11

its a little bit deceiving because you also have to take in consideration what conference that team is in...... teams like duke and miss. st. are by no means the worst teams in college football but have are in tough conferences

Exactly. Duke could probably beat Western Kentucky or Eastern Mich.

[TDenverFan]

Quote: Originally Posted by playguitar90

Exactly. Duke could probably beat Western Kentucky or Eastern Mich.

WKU had 2 wins last year, losing to them is just bad. EMU was winless, I believe

[gofresno]

I wish EA would take a look at this. Unless a "non-AQ" school is not in everyone's preseason top 25 then they are lucky to get a C+ overall rating. Teams like Hawaii(.654), Fresno State (.625), Northern Illinois(.588), Southern Miss(.582) have been consistant year in and year out but are still given lower ratings than BCS programs like Baylor(.330), Indiana (.347), Vanderbuilt(.279), and I think even Duke had a C+/B- at (.188). Sure they play tougher schedules and usually have higher rated recruiting classes, but if you line up one of those non-aqs with the listed bcs programs the non-aq would be the favorite to win.

I would just like those high end "non-AQ's" to have decent ratings and be able to be competitive with in online games as the ratings don't really mean a whole lot outside of that IMO.

[SlickRick11]

Quote: Originally Posted by gofresno

I wish EA would take a look at this. Unless a "non-AQ" school is not in everyone's preseason top 25 then they are lucky to get a C+ overall rating. Teams like Hawaii(.654), Fresno State (.625), Northern Illinois(.588), Southern Miss(.582) have been consistant year in and year out but are still given lower ratings than BCS programs like Baylor(.330), Indiana (.347), Vanderbuilt(.279), and I think even Duke had a C+/B- at (.188). Sure they play tougher schedules and usually have higher rated recruiting classes, but if you line up one of those non-aqs with the listed bcs programs the non-aq would be the favorite to win. I would just like those high end "non-AQ's" to have decent ratings and be able to be competitive with in online games as the ratings don't really mean a whole lot outside of that IMO.

I agree with the point about raising teams like hawaii, fresno st., northern illinois, southern miss (which ive gone too), etc but dont think teams like baylor, indiana, vanderbilt, and duke should be lowered because of their recruiting classes and tough schedules

[PioneerRaptor]

Perhaps another statistic that could be very useful would be to put each teams conference next to their name and also that conferences win/loss ratio so we can see just how hard or easy their schedules have been.

[TDenverFan]

Quote: Originally Posted by SlickRick11

I agree with the point about raising teams like hawaii, fresno st., northern illinois, southern miss (which ive gone too), etc but dont think teams like baylor, indiana, vanderbilt, and duke should be lowered because of their recruiting classes and tough schedules

Vandy, IU, and Baylor (Somewhat) have tough Conference Schedules. But teams like Duke, Syracuse, and Wake Forest have conference schedules just marginally better than TCU's, Hawaii's, and Southern Mississippi. Plus, the AQ teams often schedule weak OOC games against the Non-AQ teams and FCS squads...