Need input on a trade...(wwharton?)

[wwharton]

Man I've got Hasselbeck and Garrard on my big team. I've picked the wrong one every freaking week. I think I'd give him another shot this week against the Lions but I've been off on him all year so maybe that means you should go with Romo.

[Vince]

it doesn't help that most of the rankings have romo and hasselbeck neck and neck at around 8-9 respectively this week.

[wwharton]

I think Hasselbeck SHOULD get much more than that. He SHOULD be around the 16-20 range. If you want an argument for Romo though, I think they're going to try to make that a high scoring game. I think they really should have a 60/40 run/pass split, maybe even 65/35 but I'd be shocked if they actually did it. You know SEA's gonna pass though. I'm starting him this week even though Garrard's going against KC. But again, I seriously have not guessed right on the two of them once all season.

[Yeah...THAT Guy]

Quote: Originally Posted by Vince

I got another question... Hasselbeck or Romo? Last time Hasselbeck was supposed to carve up a really bad pass defense he gave me 1.8 fantasy points and i ended up losing my week by 10 points. so i have major trust issues with him. but romo is facing a pass defense that allows a passer rating of 68 to opposing QB's.

I started him that week too. In situations like this, I think of it this way. If Romo goes off, and I have him on the bench, I'm gonna kick myself for benching a stud. But if Hasselbeck goes off, I'll just be like "Oops, made a mistake there." Therefore, I'd go with Romo

[Vince]

as of now im going with romo, but will ultimately check espn's final rankings to finally decide...

i mention the arizona game, but 3-4 weeks ago when it was romo who looked awful prior to the KC game, I played Hasselbeck vs the Jags and he got me 38 points.