2017 Transaction Thread

[wwharton]

Quote: Originally Posted by jeremym480

Come on to Green Bay AD! Spoiler We have to get them back for that Favre BS and no better way than AD leading us to a Super Bowl victory.

Payback for the Favre BS would be a costly AP fumble eliminating any thought of even reaching the Super Bowl.

[The Kid 24]

Quote: Originally Posted by jeremym480

Come on to Green Bay AD! Spoiler We have to get them back for that Favre BS and no better way than AD leading us to a Super Bowl victory.

Quote: Originally Posted by roadman

I'm not sure. Lacy was on a podcast with Ian Rapport and he said the Packers have had serious talks with his people returning to the Packers. If true, I'd prefer a short term contract, a year or two. I'm with you on the Minnesota Packers(j/k), lol, don't forget Jennings and Jacke and good ole Sharper.

I would rather get Latavius Murray.

[Rocky]

Quote: Originally Posted by ProfessaPackMan

AP hitting the FA market but didn't rule out a return to Minnesota.

I havr a weird feeling that he is going to end up with New England.

[SPTO]

Quote: Originally Posted by Rocky

I havr a weird feeling that he is going to end up with New England.

That would make one of their other backs expendable but yeah, I could see AP in a Patriots uniform.

UGH

[TheShizNo1]

I can't see Peterson in a Pats uniform at all.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

[areobee401]

Can't catch, fumbles and won't play for peanuts. Nope don't see it.

[CM Hooe]

Jets release CB Darrelle Revis.

He had maybe the highest peak of any cornerback of the past decade - though Richard Sherman will surely argue against that - but I think his time in the NFL may be up. Can't play on the outside anymore and I'm not sure he'd hold up as a safety, he's never struck me as a particularly physical player.

[CM Hooe]

Quote: Originally Posted by areobee401

Cowboys way of thanking Romo for his time spent in Dallas. Rather than the alternative of trading Romo so where he might not want to spend the next 2-3 years. End the relationship as healthy as possible by doing right by Romo.

A bit late, but to add to your point: the other half of this discussion is that some team has to want to trade for Tony Romo in order for the Cowboys to, y'know, trade Tony Romo. If no team wants to trade for Romo, then the hypothetical benefit to the Cowboys is non-existant.

Last I heard, Denver was interested in bringing in Romo, but only as a free agent. Presumably, his age, salary, and injury history are all minimizing his trade value.