I agree, but remember we don't know the full context of the ratings. As I recall, the system, potential (and related experience) and "base" ratings all combine into the equation. If the system is accurate, why shouldn't Dorsey be "overall" (meaning all inclusive) better than Quinn at the start? what has Quinn done? Is his morale a factor (considering he was drafted to become the starter and is watching Derrick Anderson instead)? All I'm saying is that, without actually playing the game, we have more questions than answers, IMO.