[wishcoats]

Quote: Originally Posted by rich7sena

It would be nice for the ratings to reflect some perspective. For example, Manning is no longer at his best, I'd say he's playing around a 94 this far into his career. Rodgers is probably also around a 94 with a higher ceiling. Brady should be somewhere around a 97 because while he had a phenomenal season last year, he's not 2007 Brady which clearly was him at 99. I'd see the rankings something more like this: Brady: 97 Manning: 94 Rodgers: 94 Brees: 94 Rivers: 92 I suppose overalls don't matter as long as their individual ratings are spot on.

Agreed. Some more perspective could be put into the ratings. But, as another poster said, I think they rather give high ratings to more people so fans of those teams don't feel cheated