[K0ZZ]

Quote: Originally Posted by der juicen

Wrong. They had there second patch. They would have to patch AGAIN to put the store in. Wouldn't have been cost-effective for the developer, I figure. Patches cost and I doubt EA, the parent company, compensates on unneeded patches. Maybe even Microsoft would make a fuss as well. Or EA SUCKS SCREW EA AHHH IM TRADING THIS GAME IN.

If I remember correctly, a game gets three patches free of charge than has to pay a charge to put any further up. It wouldn't make sense to have patch 1 and patch 3 be a minor fix and the uniform store, it allows them to not rush out the third patch and put the final touches that can't be manipulated via tuner.