Madden NFL 12 Player Ratings - Seattle Seahawks and St. Louis Rams

[Steve_OS]

ESPN The Gamer has posted the Madden NFL 12 player ratings for the Seattle Seahawks and St. Louis Rams.

Are there any changes you would like to see, or are they just about right?

[xpmar9x]

Hmm who to play with (as a Titans fan):

Hass vs Locker
84 - 74 overall
67 - 83 speed
62 - 87 acceleration
88 - 95 throw power
87 - 75 short acc
79 - 77 med acc
71 - 83 deep acc
90 - 90 play action
68 - 90 throw on run

I chose Locker.

___________________

Rams are my 2nd fav team (my hometown team), and my fav NFC team. I'm a diehard Titans fan, but always root for the Rams also. They look solid, especially when you add Dahl, SimsWalker, LBs/DT they added. Should be a solid team this year!

[feeq14]

Quote: Originally Posted by xpmar9x

Hmm who to play with (as a Titans fan): Hass vs Locker 84 - 74 overall 67 - 83 speed 62 - 87 acceleration 88 - 95 throw power 87 - 75 short acc 79 - 77 med acc 71 - 83 deep acc 90 - 90 play action 68 - 90 throw on run I chose Locker. ___________________ Rams are my 2nd fav team (my hometown team), and my fav NFC team. I'm a diehard Titans fan, but always root for the Rams also. They look solid, especially when you add Dahl, SimsWalker, LBs/DT they added. Should be a solid team this year!

That 83 speed is a bit out of pocket, it seems like they forgot that whole "stretch ratings" thing with QB speed this year.

[therockstar2005]

Still don't think the Rams got enough love, but again I'm also probably a homer. I hope adding the new linebackers and DTs to the mix helps that defense look a bit better. At least we can edit players in Franchise, might give Amendola a slight bump, he gets no love at all.

[xpmar9x]

Quote: Originally Posted by feeq14

That 83 speed is a bit out of pocket, it seems like they forgot that whole "stretch ratings" thing with QB speed this year.

He ran a 4.5 40, I'd say that's 83 speed? Maybe a tad high.

Quote: Originally Posted by therockstar2005

Still don't think the Rams got enough love, but again I'm also probably a homer. I hope adding the new linebackers and DTs to the mix helps that defense look a bit better. At least we can edit players in Franchise, might give Amendola a slight bump, he gets no love at all.

Amendola looks solid, he finally got an acc/agl boost.

75 overall, 85 speed, 94 acc, 93 agl, 88 cat, 83 route, 82 CIT

That's not bad for a slot WR. He ran a 4.58 40 at his combine, I know 40 times mean nothing when it comes to field speed. But he's not super fast at top speed; just good at cuts and taking off.

[therockstar2005]

Right, the more I look at it, it's not that bad. I think it's more the state of the Rams receivers than anything else. It should be a good team for my franchise...kind of tough, but a lot of potential.

[xpmar9x]

Quote: Originally Posted by therockstar2005

Right, the more I look at it, it's not that bad. I think it's more the state of the Rams receivers than anything else. It should be a good team for my franchise...kind of tough, but a lot of potential.

Dont forget to add in:

Q Mikell - 88 overall
Mike Sims-Walker - 80 overall
Daniel Muir - 75 overall
Zac Diles - 70 overall
Cadillac Williams - (should be 75ish)
Jerious Norwood - (should be 70ish)
Ben Leber - (should be 75ish)
Brady Poppinga - (should be 70ish)
Fred Robbins - (should be 75-80)
Justin Bannan - (should be 75-80)
Harvey Dahl - (should be 90+)

you add in those 11 players and you have a solid roster.

[tap11]

I don't get some of these QB ratings. Alex Smith (who is fairly rated) had a QB rating of 82.1 last season and has a Madden rating of 75. Meanwhile Sam Bradford (who will be very good) had a QB rating of 76.5 and scores a Madden rating of 85, why? Worst of all, Matt Hasselbeck finished with a 73.2, but comes away with an 84 rating.

P.S. Kevin Kolb also is far too high at 84.