NBA 2K15 Player Ratings Revealed For the 75th Overall Rated Player Through 51

[thedream2k13]

Quote: Originally Posted by Yeah...THAT Guy

What lakers24 said, and also they don't rate these guys just on what they did last year. He was much better the two years prior.

That's the problem many are having. The players most recently activity should be what he is graded on. Not things he did 2 seasons ago. Josh Smith is prime example of this

[Yeah...THAT Guy]

Quote: Originally Posted by thedream2k13

That's the problem many are having. The players most recently activity should be what he is graded on. Not things he did 2 seasons ago. Josh Smith is prime example of this

But then you'd have guys that might have just had a fluke season rated far higher or lower than they should be.

2K has already said that if they come out and continue to play the way they did a year ago, their ratings will be adjusted.

[thedream2k13]

Quote: Originally Posted by Yeah...THAT Guy

But then you'd have guys that might have just had a fluke season rated far higher or lower than they should be. 2K has already said that if they come out and continue to play the way they did a year ago, their ratings will be adjusted.

Which means there real performance has somewhat been disregarded . Guys will be overrated in the default rosters.

[gamingsinceatari]

Quote: Originally Posted by thedream2k13

That's the problem many are having. The players most recently activity should be what he is graded on. Not things he did 2 seasons ago. Josh Smith is prime example of this

I COMPLETELY agree with this. I liked the ratings up to this point. I think there are quite a few that are over/underrated but hey thats why i appreciate and take advantage of roster editing.

[Yeah...THAT Guy]

Quote: Originally Posted by thedream2k13

Which means there real performance has somewhat been disregarded . Guys will be overrated in the default rosters.

They can be both underrated or overrated. That will happen if the ratings reflect only this past season as well because one season doesn't tell you how good a player is. If they played better than usual last year, they have a higher rating than they usually would... it just isn't based solely on the previous year so that the sample size of a player's skill is a bit larger and therefore, more likely to be accurate.

[kolanji]

IMO I THINK Joe Johnson is overrated IRL and in the game...i think Paul Pierce is better overall....but other than that, the new system seems spot on to me so far

[bedwardsroy19]

Quote: Originally Posted by Yeah...THAT Guy

What lakers24 said, and also they don't rate these guys just on what they did last year. He was much better the two years prior.

Quote: Originally Posted by thedream2k13

That's the problem many are having. The players most recently activity should be what he is graded on. Not things he did 2 seasons ago. Josh Smith is prime example of this

The most recent year is by far the most important in determining ratings and almost all that is used, I think one of my previous posts was misinterpreted and that is my fault.

I was simply saying that the year before is factored in slightly when determining some attributes as well. One great year wont give you as high as a rating as three consecutive great years.

[2_headedmonster]

Quote: Originally Posted by Yeah...THAT Guy

But then you'd have guys that might have just had a fluke season rated far higher or lower than they should be. 2K has already said that if they come out and continue to play the way they did a year ago, their ratings will be adjusted.

the nba season is a huge sample size, so the fluke thing is a reach. Now if a person doesn't build upon the previous seasons progress, then let the updates reflect it. but don't discredit what a person did for 60+ games because they didnt do it two yrs ago as well.