Madden NFL 17 Player Ratings - Top 10 Rookies, Along with a Few More

[KANE699]

Quote: Originally Posted by khaliib

Do they still follow the same weights from the chart released last year? If not, can/will another chart be released that gives the weight breakdowns, esp with having the ability to edit inside Franchise now. To go back to total unknowns dealing with the OVR's would be the wrong direction.

No it's all brand new this year. We may release weights per position soon.

[redsox4evur]

Quote: Originally Posted by Yazan Gable

Also I like how Ronnie Staley is higher rated than Laremy Tunsil just because Tunsil dropped in the draft despite being the presumptive Top 5 pick before the bong video. That's good analysis of talent right there.

Except Ronnie Stanley was according to some scouts a better player than Tunsil.

[jfsolo]

Yeah, getting these new ratings without having the new framework that allows us to put them into context, is the frustrating part.

[khaliib]

If "90" is established as "Elite" level, a guy never playing one down at the NFL level is 5/6 pts away from the same level as Revis, Sherman, Peterson etc... (guys w/90's MCV and ZCV)

Rook's will definetely be lowered here!!!

[Yazan Gable]

He's still an 82 OVR and we don't know how easy or difficult it is to get those 5 points, so already itching to the gimp the guy seems a little rash.

Quote: Originally Posted by redsox4evur

Except Ronnie Stanley was according to some scouts a better player than Tunsil.

Better since pass blocking is more important than run blocking for a left tackle. He is not as good a pass blocker but he's a better run blocker and a better physical specimen. They're both definitely better than Jack Conklin who gets to be the same OVR as Tunsil because of his position drafted.

[BreakingBad2013]

Quote: Originally Posted by Yazan Gable

Since hurting his ankle he's likely to be more of an Anquan Boldin type than a Michael Irvin type. Also I like how Ronnie Staley is higher rated than Laremy Tunsil just because Tunsil dropped in the draft despite being the presumptive Top 5 pick before the bong video. That's good analysis of talent right there.

If this were the case that TE and K wouldn't be on the top 10 list. Also Stanley was projected as a much better run blocker and sufficient pass blocker where Tunsil had some flaws in his run game.

As for Conklin he was compared to Jon Runyan, and know to be able to play any OL position at a high level

[KANE699]

Quote: Originally Posted by khaliib

If "90" is established as "Elite" level, a guy never playing one down at the NFL level is 5/6 pts away from the same level as Revis, Sherman, Peterson etc... (guys w/90's MCV and ZCV) Rook's will definetely be lowered here!!!

Ramsey is a bit of an anomaly, he has been highly regarded by everyone.

[Yazan Gable]

Quote: Originally Posted by BreakingBad2013

If this were the case that TE and K wouldn't be on the top 10 list. Also Stanley was projected as a much better run blocker and sufficient pass blocker where Tunsil had some flaws in his run game.

Stanley was projected to be a much better pass blocker and sufficent run blocker while Tunsil did not show a lot in the pass and run because of the scheme he played in but showed exceptional athleticism and good skills in both pass and run blocking (not as good a pass blocker as Stanley, but a better run blocker.)