![]() |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
|
Godly Youth Pull..to seel or play?
Well...he is immediatly the best oufield player on my team(i train gk and have a formidible clown)...he is also probobly worth a lot on the markey since he is so well rounded...what should i do?
Jesús Mújica (15338717) 19 years, passable form, healthy A pleasant guy who is temperamental and upright. Has disastrous experience and poor leadership abilities. Speciality: Powerful Nationality: USA Assessed value: 433 000 US$ Wage: 2 840 US$/week Owner: Blade Bombers Warnings: 0 Stamina: passable Goaltending: disastrous Playmaking: inadequate Passing: passable Winger: solid Defending: weak Scoring: excellent Set Pieces: disastrous He could be a star at forward, wing, and maybe even mid...i dont have any players pulling over 2.5 stars...i run a 3-5-2 with my two forwrds both pulling 2.5s...2 of my three mids pulling 2.5s and one 2...my wings pull a 2.5 and a 2, but the two is an excellent winger with no secondaries...my defense is my best part, but i wonder if it would be better to sell him and buy a player or two...change my formation to a 3-4-3(altough i have my 2 biggest maches the next two weeks ad cant afford the exp drop...), or play him...not sure where he would be best... If i sell, how much should i start him for, and if i play, where and in what formation?
__________________
Underachievement The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut by the lawnmower. Despair It's always darkest just before it goes pitch black. Demotivation Sometimes the best solution to morale problems is just to fire all of the unhappy people. http://www.despair.com/viewall.html Last edited by Blade6119 : 08-11-2003 at 01:17 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Here and There
|
Well that's a nice conundrum. If he was 17 that could be the pull of the year. Since he's 19 you won't get as much, but someone buying him will likely focus on the scoring/passing combo. I'd play him a match at forward and see what kind of rating he gets before setting a price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
|
excuse the title...i cant spell
__________________
Underachievement The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut by the lawnmower. Despair It's always darkest just before it goes pitch black. Demotivation Sometimes the best solution to morale problems is just to fire all of the unhappy people. http://www.despair.com/viewall.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lost
|
I'd say you can fairly easily get 750k for him as a striker. I sold a 19 excellent scoring inad passing/defending/SP for 600k.
I'd disregard his winger, why waste his best stats on the least important position (atleast till new tactics kick in). as for your 2 star excellent winger, in bad form or something? I've got a solid winger w/ no secondaries that get's 2.5* in passable form ( I think inad aswell ) play him offensive if you're not.
__________________
Stupidity is an Equal Opportunity Employer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
College Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bay Area
|
I hate you!
Exc scoring, pass passing player alone will go for 500-600+, and that is for someone who is to old to train. If you put him on the market with a minimum of 800K, you would probably get it, and if not you have a forward that will last you for at least 3-4 seasons. If you are going to keep him play him at forward, otherwise you should sell him and buy a winger with the same skills for 200K or less. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lost
|
I'd start him around 650-700 easily
__________________
Stupidity is an Equal Opportunity Employer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
College Prospect
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: New York, NY
|
I think you'd be better off keeping him because he's got at least one useless skill.
If you play him at winger his scoring is meaningless and vice versa if you play him at forward. The inad PM also doesn't help and neither would training it to passable because you'd now have two useless skills. So I doubt PM trainers would be interested, thus leaving you with scoring or winger trainers. I think you could get a few hundred K, but his being 19 would hurt his sale value since a 17 yo solid would surpass him talent wise by the end of next season. So I agree with Desnudo, play him at forward and keep him if he makes a significant difference to your ratings. Last edited by NAIWF : 08-11-2003 at 01:25 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Louisiana
|
I would start the bidding around $650 and sell him, you could use the extra money and buy a forward with similar skills for cheaper and have less on his wages since they are so high with all the extra skills.
but damn that is a great pull! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
|
Quote:
No...hes passable i think...i have him playing normal right now...ere are his stats: Elmer Washington (13525631) 19 years, passable form, healthy A controversial person who is balanced and honest. Has disastrous experience and disastrous leadership abilities. Speciality: Technical Nationality: USA Assessed value: 76 000 US$ Wage: 820 US$/week Owner: Blade Bombers Warnings: 0 Stamina: passable Goaltending: disastrous Playmaking: wretched Passing: poor Winger: excellent Defending: poor Scoring: weak Set Pieces: poor Here is the other winger who is offensive and putting up 2.5: Peter Martinsson (8312788) 20 years, passable form, healthy A controversial person who is temperamental and honest. Has wretched experience and weak leadership abilities. Speciality: Head Nationality: Sverige Assessed value: 159 000 US$ Wage: 1 584 US$/week including 20% Bonus Owner: Blade Bombers Warnings: 0 Stamina: excellent Goaltending: disastrous Playmaking: weak Passing: passable Winger: passable Defending: poor Scoring: inadequate Set Pieces: weak Any reason why elmer is not ptting up?
__________________
Underachievement The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut by the lawnmower. Despair It's always darkest just before it goes pitch black. Demotivation Sometimes the best solution to morale problems is just to fire all of the unhappy people. http://www.despair.com/viewall.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Georgia
|
Play him offensively.
I have a passable winger, one with only weak, poor, and weak secondaries and he puts up 2.5 *'s in passable form. Maybe his technical specialty hurt. What was the weather? Last edited by larrymcg421 : 08-11-2003 at 01:46 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
|
i play martinsson offensive and elmer normal since he is on my weaker side normally...
__________________
Underachievement The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut by the lawnmower. Despair It's always darkest just before it goes pitch black. Demotivation Sometimes the best solution to morale problems is just to fire all of the unhappy people. http://www.despair.com/viewall.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lost
|
Nathaniel Conklin (B Team WB might sell, my best YP kinda attached :-)
96 000 US$, 18 years, passable form Has disastrous experience and inadequate leadership abilities Stamina: solid Keeper: disastrous Playmaking: poor Passing: weak Winger: solid Defending: inadequate Scoring: poor Set Pieces: inadequate Peter Taylor (starting winger) 96 000 US$, 18 years, inadequate form Has disastrous experience and weak leadership abilities Stamina: weak Keeper: disastrous Playmaking: poor Passing: passable Winger: solid Defending: weak Scoring: poor Set Pieces: disastrous Anthony Torres (B Team winger) 86 000 US$, 20 years, passable form Has disastrous experience and passable leadership abilities Stamina: excellent Keeper: disastrous Playmaking: poor Passing: wretched Winger: solid Defending: poor Scoring: weak Set Pieces: poor all 3 when played offensively put up 2.5* in inad-passable form as a winger. Conklin is 2* defensive WB, haven't tried normal or offensive yet. experimenting with 2 IM, 2 Winger 3-4-3 in friendly this week. if a winger doesn't have secondaries, play him offensive since it boost his winger skill.
__________________
Stupidity is an Equal Opportunity Employer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
|
Quote:
He has put up two in every match he has played...
__________________
Underachievement The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut by the lawnmower. Despair It's always darkest just before it goes pitch black. Demotivation Sometimes the best solution to morale problems is just to fire all of the unhappy people. http://www.despair.com/viewall.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lost
|
and if those fail, I've got my IM/Winger for 'must get higher MF' games:
Kurtmartin Heinrichs 65 000 US$, 26 years, solid form Has weak experience and disastrous leadership abilities [Head] Stamina: excellent Keeper: wretched Playmaking: passable Passing: weak Winger: passable Defending: poor Scoring: wretched Set Pieces: wretched he puts up 3* as an offensive winger, 2.5* as IM (3 in exc form) haven't tried TM winger yet since I only play with 1 winger and haven't had a 'go all out and sacrifice attack for midfield' kind of match yet...
__________________
Stupidity is an Equal Opportunity Employer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lexington, KY
|
Quote:
I would say any defense position is the least important (excluding keeper). But that's just me... ![]() Last edited by TargetPractice6 : 08-11-2003 at 02:30 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Here
|
Quote:
Yeah, normally i'd say you're an idiot, but I gave up 5 goals last game with an all outstanding back line, and the other teams Offense had nothing higher than exc. edit that, I lost to a team w/ solid/pass/pass attack... bullshit. Last edited by Easy Mac : 08-11-2003 at 08:39 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tulsa
|
Quote:
I know how you feel. My all-solid defense lost to a Inad/weak/Inad attack 1-3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Here
|
Quote:
Yeah, and nevermind that my pass/inad/pass attack couldn't score on his exc/sol/exc defense. Lets see, When you compare my defense to his offense, I was +11 NSI. When you compare his D to my O, he was +6. Shouldn't I have scored easier against his D than he did against mine? And his midfield only beat me by 2 levels, so he was only +1 NSI. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|