![]() |
|
|
#1 | |||
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Troy, NY
|
Quote:
I bought him for $74k. His last few matches he has been putting up 3 stars... looks like he was replaced by a trainee and that's why he was sold. Also, consider that my midfield includes one 3-star guy, another 2-star player, and a 1-star player. Thanks! ~kyle
__________________
Quis custodiets ipsos custodes? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
|
Take my opinion for what it's worth (nothing basically), but whenever you can get a 3 star player for less than $100K, I think it's a good deal. His ratings aren't that great, but if he's putting up 3 stars...he's probably a very high passable PM and very high inadequate passing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Willow Glen, CA
|
Bee, I'd say the *** rating has more to do with his 'Weak' experience than anything else. But I do agree, good buy, especially because you have probably a season or two before he starts declining.
__________________
Every time a Dodger scores a run, an angel has its wings ripped off by a demon, and is forced to tearfully beg the demon to cauterize the wounds.The demon will refuse, and the sobbing angel will lie in a puddle of angel blood and feathers for eternity, wondering why the Dodgers are allowed to score runs.That’s not me talking: that’s science. McCoveyChronicles.com. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Louisiana
|
I would say very good buy becuase of what Vince and Bee said- but also because he has Inadequate winger, if for some reason you really needed a midfield boost for one game you could pick up another 2.5 star middie and then play this guy as a winger towards middle, he has the ability to play 2 positions which for me is a big +
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: VA
|
I'd say it would be a nice buy. Woulda been better if he was younger and trainable, but you gotta take what you can get, right?
__________________
Chicago Eagles 2 time ZFL champions We're "rebuilding" |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Troy, NY
|
Yea' - I train forwards anyways, so age isn't a concern except for when he starts to decline.
__________________
Quis custodiets ipsos custodes? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Troy, NY
|
Also - going from 3 stars, 2 stars, and 1 star in the midfield to 3 stars, 3 stars, and 2+ stars - what kind of midfield boost should I look for?
I was putting up Poor with mediocre TS, and weak with Good TS. Weak is the highest it's ever gotten to... Thanks! ~kyle
__________________
Quis custodiets ipsos custodes? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hattrick Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Pintendre, Qc, Canada
|
I'd say you shold be able to achieve inadequate on a regular basis. I have two 3* and a 2.5* and the lowest I usually get, while playing normal (no PIC involved) is inadequate. Gotta say though that my 3* may be in part because the players have good secondaries and I play them accordingly (one is inadequate passing, played offensive, the other inadequate defending, played defensive). When all the stars align just right and I put another middie at winger toward middle, I can get solid...
FM
__________________
A Black Belt is a White Belt who refused to give up... follow my story: The real life story of a running frog... |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Troy, NY
|
Redux... this guy cost me $60k.
Quote:
Has regularly been putting up 2.5-3 stars as an offensive winger or inner mid. If I play this guy in the mid, I'll have the following midfield... 2.5 (defensive wing)... 2.5 (inner) ... 3 (inner) ... 3 (inner...) 2.5 (offensive wing) What kind of midfield ratings would that get me? How about if I went... 2.5 (towards middle) ... 3 (inner) ... 3 (inner) ... 2.5 (offensive wing) Thanks! ~kyle
__________________
Quis custodiets ipsos custodes? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|