![]() |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Colorado Springs
|
USA - Mexico
We're off and running. I picked a decent day to call in sick (which, unfortunatly, I *am* sick, but hey, at least I can watch the world cup!)
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
College Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Beantown
|
BORING!
__________________
Boston Bashers - III.14 - (8347) |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
|
How much did you bet on it?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
College Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Beantown
|
Question
If you have Jud wouldn't you run an Offensive CD instead of a TtM Winger? I mean your Central defense will still be divine (a level or two less) but your wing attack will be soooo much better
__________________
Boston Bashers - III.14 - (8347) Last edited by KevinNU7 : 02-06-2004 at 02:48 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alexandria, VA
|
TM wingers don't affect defense except to lessen the winger's contribution to it slightly.
It bumps your midfield.
__________________
FOBL: Where anyone not in IAP FOFL: I may be the commish, but it's still pretty good. Last edited by DukeRulesMAB : 02-06-2004 at 02:56 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Troy, NY
|
Duke: He's saying that playing that CD offensive would hurt the defense... not moving the winger from TM to wing.
__________________
Quis custodiets ipsos custodes? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lost
|
problem with that Kevin is offensive CDs are harder to come by at that level.
I think TM wingers also give a bigger boost to midfield than an offensive CD.
__________________
Stupidity is an Equal Opportunity Employer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
College Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Beantown
|
Quote:
Just curious, what kinda of playmaking does a national team TtM Winger have compared to a national team OCD?
__________________
Boston Bashers - III.14 - (8347) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alexandria, VA
|
Ah, misread
There are no team OCD's (at least not in the US). No one trains up both defending and playmaking (largely because defending trains so slowly that it's impossible to double-train). So even if it were a valid strategic point (I don't think it is, but someone more experienced than me like TP6, apoc or Billy could better answer), there doesn't exist the personnel to run it. Further note: I'm pretty sure for most big time nat team defense trainers, playmaking is considered a "dirty" skill for trainees. Which means, not only do they not train it up, having playmaking skill is considered a bad thing, because of the wage hike. EDIT: apoc would be the one to ask about my latter point.
__________________
FOBL: Where anyone not in IAP FOFL: I may be the commish, but it's still pretty good. Last edited by DukeRulesMAB : 02-06-2004 at 03:27 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
College Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Beantown
|
Ok, that answers that. I assumed that a national Winger TtM had playmaking above brillaint to go along with their great winger skill. It seems like CD aren't trained at all in playmaking and they rarely excellent/formidable. That makes sense I guess.
Makes you wonder though if a market could be created
__________________
Boston Bashers - III.14 - (8347) |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alexandria, VA
|
FWIW, there are two types of nat team TM wingers, one is the balanced type you referenced there (such as Longoria), but the main is basically a midfielder with a nominal degree of winger skill (inad to solid). The TM guy today was of the latter type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
College Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Beantown
|
thanks for the info!
__________________
Boston Bashers - III.14 - (8347) |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|