![]() |
|
|
#1 | |||
|
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
Mark Brunell close to being traded to... Wahsington?!
my take: this has Snyder written all over it.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/column...len&id=1729627 Quote:
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Oshkosh, WI
|
The last thing Washington needs is a QB. Ramsey is a very good QB who got the snot beat out of him last year. They should be more worried about a running back and offensive line help.
__________________
USFL: Charlotte Fightn' Squirrels |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Jersey
|
I agree. I really like Ramsey's potential and it doesn't make sense to bring Brunell into that mix. Ramsey is developing nicely and bringing Brunell would surely retard that development. I think it would hurt the long term future for that team to some extent, and therefore as an Eagles' fan I hope they do make the trade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: East Anglia
|
I'm surprised Brunell would go along with this. He has said all along he does not want to go through the same thing he did in Jax with Leftwich pushing him out. He wants to be the starter without question. Meanwhile, Miami continues to flounder and let opportunities slip away with their dream team of front office ineptness.
__________________
Molon labe |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL
|
Yeah I dont know why this fell through, Miami seemed like the perfect fit for him. Maybe he likes Jay and doesn't want to compete for a starting job with him. Oh well we have until March, maybe this deal will fall apart between now and then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Placerville, CA
|
This makes a lot more sense than you're giving it credit for. Gibbs has always preferred veteran QB's, and he wants to win now. Ramsey's contract is very cap-friendly through like 2006, so Gibbs will let him chill on the pine for a few years and learn the game more thoroughly. By the time he starts again, he'll be an instant all-pro.
I'm not worried about the o-line - Gibbs' teams have always been solid there, and he'll make it work. I do, however, hope they get some d-line help - there's no hiding the lack of talent there. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
I don't think sticking your obvious QB of the future on the bench for a few years is in his best interests. It may be a good short-term move, but i think (if this happens) this may prove to be a bad long-term move.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
This is simply stupid. Unless their plan to trade Ramsey to another team for a #1 pick. No Way in Heck I'd give up a #2 for Brunell at this stage of his career.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Jersey
|
Quote:
I agree 100%. If Ramsey hadn't started and this was his 1st or even his second year, I would say good move. However, Ramsey has started too many games and is too far along to suddenly sit him now. This seems to much like a win now move and forget about the future. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Maassluis, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
|
But realistically, where would Mark Brunell become a starter?
The AFC East has Brady, Pennington, Bledsoe and Fiedler/Griese The AFC North has Maddox, Kitna/Palmer, Holcomb/Couch and Boller The AFC South has Leftwich, McNair, Manning and Carr The AFC West has Gannon, Plummer, Trent Green and Brees/Flutie The NFC East has McNabb, Ramsey, Kerry Collins and Carter The NFC North has Favre, Culpepper, Stewart/Grossman and Harrington The NFC South has Brooks, Vick, Brad Johnson and Delhomme The NFC West has Tim Hasselbeck, Warner, Garcia and an open spot in Arizona The restricted FA market has Marc Bulger, A.J. Feely, Mike McMahon The FA market has Jeff Blake So basically, where would Brunell have a serious shot at become the new #1? San Diego? Arizona? Cleveland? Baltimore? Chicago? Oakland? Pittsburgh? Edited to avoid confusion in the east and west divisions. Last edited by MIJB#19 : 02-08-2004 at 09:38 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL
|
I think Brunell would have a good shot at being the starter in Miami. Greise will get cut as soon as possible because he's due a huge roster bonus and Fiedler has proven he's not durable enough to start 16 games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Roster Filler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cicero
|
Quote:
Yes, Brunell would have a serious chance to start in any of those places, as well as probably Dallas. There are at least 8 QB situations in the NFL worse than Washington's (at least for starter). Miami is also starting to realize they will not win with Fiedler and are likely to cut Griese.
__________________
http://www.nateandellie.net Now featuring twice the babies for the same low price! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Cary, NC
|
I don't like this move as a Washington fan. Ramsey has shown a lot of good potential, and I think could really develop into a fine player with some more experience. Kicking him to the bench will hurt his confidence and I'm not sure will do a lot for the team down the road, this has the smell of a classic Snyder short-term fix.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
|
Quote:
I think you have your compass directions a bit messed up...
__________________
-- Greg -- Author of various FOF utilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Lethargic Hooligan
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: hello kitty found my wallet at a big tent revival and returned it with all the cash missing
|
this was step 17 in Evil Plan 2: Son of Evil Plan
__________________
donkey, donkey, walk a little faster |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Maassluis, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
|
Quote:
Actually, I figured I replaced East and West with eachother, yet I felt no need to edit things. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Strictly FWIW ...
Was listening to ESPN Radio GameNight while driving home from Atlanta last night & some "expert" or another was talking about this report. Generally, the take was that Brunnell was likely to be expected to compete for the starting job but not especially being brought in to win the starting job. As has already been mentioned in this thread, Gibbs likes veteran QB's, even if they're backing up a young starter. The implication was that Gibbs level of concern about the QB situation in DC was so great that he was willing to part with a 2nd round pick to relieve that worry. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL
|
Funny that Gibbs would be concerned about the QB situation concidering he's won Super Bowls with Doug Williams and Mark Rypen (sp?). Ive heard that Brunell definitly wants to start and doesn't want to compete with a younger QB and have a repeat of his situation in Jacksonville, this trade seems to fit neither of those criteria.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Rennes, France
|
Rypien - But that guyd did win a SuperBowl
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
This guy has posted so much, his fingers are about to fall off.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: In Absentia
|
I was in Jacksonville this weekend, and this was top o' the crease, headline news in Sunday's paper, and lead the Saturday night newscast.
I think they still like the guy there...
__________________
M's pitcher Miguel Batista: "Now, I feel like I've had everything. I've talked pitching with Sandy Koufax, had Kenny G play for me. Maybe if I could have an interview with God, then I'd be served. I'd be complete." |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL
|
The Florida Times Union is reporting that Brunell wants to go to Miami, so this Washington trade isn't in the bag yet. However, I don't think Miami will give up a first round pick to get him, so they may wait for him to become a free agent. Which means if Washington (or anyone) is willing to give up a first or even a second round pick to get him, he's theirs. It'll be interesting to see how this plays out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Placerville, CA
|
Quote:
Not likely. At most, they'll send their second-round pick, and MAYBE throw in Rod Gardner. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
|
Quote:
The article quoted above says that his roster bonus is due before the trade window opens. If that is the case, and if he would rather be a FA than get traded, he can simply not defer that bonus. Then, JAX would have to either pay him the bonus and trade him (not likely when a team is dumping a guy for cap reasons) or cut him before the bonus is due. There may be other factors at play that influence his decision, but I would assume that he and JAX contracted for his roster bonus to be on that date specifically to give him that sort of leverage. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Placerville, CA
|
I think a second round pick is a fair price if it keeps Brunell away from the Cowboys... and, yes, I'm a Redskins fan, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL
|
Youre a Redskins fan? I thought you were a Pats fan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL
|
BTW, I think the Jags are starting to overplay their hand. I'm hearing now that they are gonna pay him the roster bonus because there was more interest in him than anticipated. I personally think Brunell has three good years left in him. I hope the Dolphins can get him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
lolzcat
Join Date: May 2001
Location: williamsburg, va
|
I think the Jags are playing this wrong too.. They're starting to get too greedy for dishing an over 30 quarterback.. sure Brunell is one of the better quarterbacks in the league -- when he's healthy. He has had some injuries of late and is just getting older...
As a skins fan, i'm not happy about this potential move. If Brunell is brought in as a backup I think it's a GREAT move, but I just don't see that happening.. and as many others have mentioned, when Ramsey has progressed so far already, it doesn't seem to make sense to stunt his growth after all of the improvement he had this year. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Hockey Boy
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
|
[quote=
I'm of the belief that you can have two teams in any sport, as long as they are of different conferences/leagues.[/QUOTE] I don't know about this. As an Italian friend of mine once said: "You can have many women in your life, but you can only ever have one football team." Sure, there are certain teams I like more than others. I like the Seahawks (cool helmets, plus Steve Largent back in the day) and the Browns (my mom's from Cleveland), but I'd only ever consider myself a "fan" of the Lions. No thread-jack so... Brunell. I like him. I don't know if he's worth a second round pick though. That's awfully steep for a guy who lost his starting job to a rookie (injuries were a part, I know). He has had success in the league is (was?) mobile and has a decent arm. I know Gibbs likes veterans, but they only have 4 picks in the entire draft. They should be able to sign a vet. Granted he (whoever he is) wont be as good as Brunell, but he wont cost a 2nd rounder. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|