![]() |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Poet in Residence
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Charleston, SC
|
OT - Bush Caught With Dead Hooker (Ping: Fritz)
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Lethargic Hooligan
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: hello kitty found my wallet at a big tent revival and returned it with all the cash missing
|
I wouldn't have gone, but it was one of the strongest lineups for a tour I have seen. Of course it would have been stronger in 1994.
__________________
donkey, donkey, walk a little faster |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Lethargic Hooligan
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: hello kitty found my wallet at a big tent revival and returned it with all the cash missing
|
dola:
No misbehavin', NoMyths.
__________________
donkey, donkey, walk a little faster |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
This guy has posted so much, his fingers are about to fall off.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: In Absentia
|
That's funny, at the King's X forums, the consensus is that that lineup sucked donkey balls, aside from the Pixies. And I think that underscores the problem with this lineup - for years, they've drawn heavily from the hard rock/alt/metal band rosters, and then all of a sudden, they do a 180 and field a roster of bands, the fans of which have probably only occasionally had reason to go to a Lollapalooza show.
Look at last year - Jane's Addiction, Audioslave, QOTSA, Incubus, A Perfect Circle...you can't replace them with an old, fat Morrisey, Wilco, a critic's darling that no one I know has heard or likes, Sonic Youth and PJ Harvey, both of whom immediately scream Lollapalooza 1991!, and Flaming Lips, a cool band but hardly a huge draw (similar to putting They Might Be Giants on the bill). This makes perfect sense to me.
__________________
M's pitcher Miguel Batista: "Now, I feel like I've had everything. I've talked pitching with Sandy Koufax, had Kenny G play for me. Maybe if I could have an interview with God, then I'd be served. I'd be complete." |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|