Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-12-2005, 05:00 PM   #1
neromadrid
n00b
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
QB not doing what the gameplan calls for, and ending up on his A$$ for it

Hey folks,

I'm Dolphins GM in RNFL. So far in 2005, which we just started my team hasn't come close to expectations. Part of me wants to attribute it to early season jitters based on a lack of cohesion due to a new QB, LT and WR in the fold (Brunell, Deese, Boston).

But aside from that there is a glaring area where I'm simply getting crushed in, QB sacks. After giving up 4 in the first week of play I've gone on to give up 7 and then 5 for a grand total of 16 in 3 games.

I understand that Brunell is a risk in this way, with his 23 Sense Rush rating and all but this might be a bit over the top. He's also an 80 in Read Defense. Doesn't that mean he should be able to recognize when a blitz is coming?

This past week I took the offense and reigned it in a bit, basically setting up a West Coast passing game on top of my rushing attack but that still didn't do the trick. My O-line matched up nicely against my opponent but Deese alone gave up 3 sacks and he's a 90 in Pass Block. The rest of my line is Very Good as well. Minus the RT spot who is still growing, but I can live with him giving up 10 sacks this year.

Brunell ended up going deep 6 times which was about 6 more than I had hoped for since the goal was to get the ball out of his hands quickly.

My loss was by 3 points this week and they scored a TD with 1:10 remaining. So playing from behind can't be blamed for why he went deep.

My questions are:

1) Do I have a renegade QB on my hands? How can I get him in line and have him execute my bidding?

2) How can I minimize my exposure to sacks? This is the big one. I figured a quick passing game and a heavy dosage of run would do it. My top RG was just lost for 46 weeks, which means a rookie will get in at RG even complicating this more.

I have a top TE and top blocking FB.

Anyone care to opine?

neromadrid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2005, 05:58 PM   #2
Pyser
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
i would think you are on the right track, throwing shorter and running more often...but im interested to hear other people's thoughts. this is something im sure everyone would like some help in - minimizing sacks...
Pyser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2005, 06:01 PM   #3
Noop
Bonafide Seminole Fan
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Florida
The game is flawed. And will remained flawed..
__________________
Living in an Oligarchy.
Noop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2005, 06:02 PM   #4
scarface132
Mascot
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Stockton Ca
Te's don't pass block at all, it has been proven at fofc in another thread.

A bug if I ever have seen one imo.
scarface132 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2005, 06:10 PM   #5
sovereignstar
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noop
The game is flawed. And will remained flawed..

darrrrrrrrrrr
sovereignstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2005, 06:21 PM   #6
QuikSand
lolzcat
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarface132
Te's don't pass block at all, it has been proven at fofc in another thread.

Actually, what we *know* is that TEs do not get charged with sacks allowed.

Maybe that means they aren't included in pass blocking at all. Maybe it means that they factor in in a general way, but are never in a single blocking assignment. Or maybe it means something else, more subtle than either of those.
QuikSand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2005, 06:48 PM   #7
JonInMiddleGA
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
Quote:
Brunell ended up going deep 6 times

Just wondering, is there something in the WR's/WR ratings that could influence this?
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis
JonInMiddleGA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2005, 07:14 PM   #8
neromadrid
n00b
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
interesting thought Jon, but I have two starting WRs who are rated 60 and 58 current. both very well rounded guys and my RB and TE are 84 and 81 respectively...I doubt it's the targets
neromadrid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2005, 07:16 PM   #9
Franklinnoble
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Placerville, CA
Mark Brunell is your starting quarterback.

Address that problem, then get back to me.
Franklinnoble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2005, 07:28 PM   #10
j51
Mascot
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Sense Rush is all that matters. If he doesn't have that, he's going to be sacked often no matter what you do.
j51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2005, 03:02 AM   #11
Icy
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toledo - Spain
Being off topic, neromadrid, are you from Madrid? I feel alone being almost the only Spanish here along with KeyserSoze
__________________

Icy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2005, 03:53 AM   #12
MIJB#19
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Maassluis, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Balance on offense to limit succesful gambling by the defense can help too, I think.
Personally, I've got a QB's around 50-60 in sense rush, two guards who can't protect the pass (below 25) and the RT and C are just above average (50-60), while the LT is elite (almost 90), but also injury prone. Maybe having a blocking FB (and TE?) does help out, meaning that using FB-less formations make you more viable to getting sacked?

Of course, with a sense rush of below 40, you're asking for trouble, but I am not that's all there is. When I had a 99 sense rush QB, he still got sacked about 2 times per game behind a crappy OL (4 of the 5 starters below 25 in pass protection).
__________________
* 2005 Golden Scribe winner for best FOF Dynasty about IHOF's Maassluis Merchantmen
* Former GM of GEFL's Houston Oilers and WOOF's Curacao Cocktail
MIJB#19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2005, 09:22 AM   #13
neromadrid
n00b
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Icy, I'm living in Madrid but not Spanish...

MIJB, From what I've gathered so far the game hasn't been designed to be linear and in that I mean that not just one variable tells the story. I would be too simple otherwise.

That having been stated, I was looking for answers that might be "tip of the iceberg" towards figuring out what matters where.
neromadrid is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:49 AM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.