![]() |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
|
Thunderbird vs. OE
Which is better? Has anyone made the change? Does T-bird save disk space over OE?
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
|
Anything is better than OE, IMNSHO. Never could figure out its interface, and at one company I worked for I lost my entire address book when they tried to set up a network share with a company-wide address book. I hate Outlook with a passion.
It's still a tossup with me as to whether Thunderbird or Eudora are better. Thunderbird is being updated more regularly and has a decent SPAM filter, but seems to perform worse than Eudora did. If I ALT-TAB from a compile over to Thunderbird, it seems to take a bit to appear, where Eudora would just pop up.
__________________
-- Greg -- Author of various FOF utilities |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
College Prospect
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Nuremberg, Germany
|
Quote:
I agree 100%. I use Thunderbird regularly, never had any sort of problem. I think the anti-spam filter is great. It "learns" which e-mails are trash and which not. I'd suggest try to install Thunderbird, you'll notice the difference. And if you don't want to try Thunderbird, anything is better than Outlook... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wisconsin
|
I'm not a big wine or malt liquor fan but, if I absolutely had to pick one.. I guess I'd go with Olde English over Thunderbird...
__________________
You, you will regret what you have done this day. I will make you regret ever being born. Your going to wish you never left your mothers womb, where it was warm and safe... and wet. i am going to show you pain you never knew existed, you are going to see a whole new spectrum of pain, like a Rainboooow. But! This rainbow is not just like any other rainbow, its... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Calgary
|
I've been using Thunderbird for a while now instead of Outlook. In fact, I'd go back to IE before Outlook. FireFox still has trouble with some pages whereas Thunderbird has been integrated seamlessly into XP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Portland, OR
|
I completely thought this was about drinking thunderbird or Old English 800 malt liquor. Then I though Gstelmack's post was a joke. Now i don't know what to think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkeley
|
I like Outlook 2003 okay (Not Outlook Express... totally different products... couldn't imagine using OE). I switched to Thunderbird because Outlook 2003 was choking on the volume of email I had at the time. I'd reccomend average users to stick with Outlook, but if you're a power user or willing to spend a bit of extra time for the payoff Thunderbird is really, really nice. I didn't know anyone used Eudora anymore... that was my first email client and I used that up until maybe 4 years ago, but Outlook XP passed it by and Outlook 2003 kills it IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
|
Thunderbird is very good.
Thunderbird and Firefox browser a great combo to have |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|