Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-25-2005, 10:16 AM   #1
albionmoonlight
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
Cederic Benson Holdout

Looks like it has reached the really nasty stage. While I am sure that this will all be resolved before he has to reenter the draft, I had a sense that he would be trouble when I saw him at the draft. Someone from ESPN interviewed him after he was picked and he just seethed with anger at the whole draft process and what he felt was undue poking and prodding by the teams deciding whether to draft him. Didn't seem like a real happy camper.

I have nothing against Bears fans, but I kind of hope that he stays held out now. I've never seen a top pick re-enter the draft, and it would be kind of interesting to see that play out. Besides, I think that Thomas Jones will be just fine this year.

albionmoonlight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 10:21 AM   #2
timmynausea
College Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
He did seem pretty upset at the draft.
timmynausea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 10:22 AM   #3
Icy
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toledo - Spain
Why is he holding out? i haven't read about it yet.
Icy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 10:26 AM   #4
Raiders Army
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Black Hole
I think that Mike Williams has set a precedent. He only played for a couple of years at USC, didn't play at all last year, and was still picked top 10 in the draft. Even Maurice Clarett got picked in the third round. Benson could sit a year and hope to get picked by a better team.

That being said, Mike Williams played a "good guy" the past year at USC. He didn't complain, etc., which I'm sure was attractive for NFL teams. Benson, on the other hand, could potentially be another Ricky Williams or Terrell Owens.
Raiders Army is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 10:29 AM   #5
gstelmack
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by timmynausea
He did seem pretty upset at the draft.

He was pretty upset that he was being compared to Ricky Williams. Then he goes and acts like him
__________________
-- Greg
-- Author of various FOF utilities
gstelmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 10:30 AM   #6
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
what's up with texas running backs?
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 10:31 AM   #7
Raiders Army
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Black Hole
I don't remember a cover with him dressed up in a wedding gown.
Raiders Army is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 10:32 AM   #8
albionmoonlight
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icy
Why is he holding out? i haven't read about it yet.

Money.
albionmoonlight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 10:33 AM   #9
Huckleberry
College Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
The dumbest thing about all this is people saying he's acting like Ricky Williams. Williams signed a ridiculously cheap contract where he would have had to have been an All-Pro to see any good money with the Saints.

Benson is doing the exact opposite.
__________________
The one thing all your failed relationships have in common is you.

The Barking Carnival (Longhorn-centered sports blog)
College Football Adjusted Stats and Ratings
Huckleberry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 10:38 AM   #10
stevew
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
How far apart is he with the Bears? If they are offering like 10 million in guarantees, and you think you're worth 18 million, its one thing, but if the difference is only a few 1-2 million, sign the damn contract and play by now. You lose more money by not playing in the long run.

I think the real problem is benson's agent, who is also Hines Ward's agent. This guy wants to be Rosenhaus, but he aint. Apparently his holdout bullshit got a good contract for Andre Wadsworth a few years back, and he thinks it will work again.
stevew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 10:44 AM   #11
albionmoonlight
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry
The dumbest thing about all this is people saying he's acting like Ricky Williams. Williams signed a ridiculously cheap contract where he would have had to have been an All-Pro to see any good money with the Saints.

Benson is doing the exact opposite.

I agree. Had he played for any school other than Texas, the Ricky comparisions would not be out there. It is a very superficial connection.
albionmoonlight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 11:04 AM   #12
Honolulu_Blue
Hockey Boy
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Poor the Bears. First they lose Grossman and now they are embroiled in a nasty contract dispute with their first round pick. This is sad. I can barely hold back the tears. I feel so terrible for them. However will I go on?
__________________
Steve Yzerman: 1,755 points in 1,514 regular season games. 185 points in 196 postseason games. A First-Team All-Star, Conn Smythe Trophy winner, Selke Trophy winner, Masterton Trophy winner, member of the Hockey Hall of Fame, Olympic gold medallist, and a three-time Stanley Cup Champion. Longest serving captain of one team in the history of the NHL (19 seasons).
Honolulu_Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 11:08 AM   #13
CraigSca
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Not Delaware - hurray!
I wouldn't worry about Benson - if he's good enough, people will forget he held out like this and consider him god, just like John Elway. And no, I still haven't forgiven that jerk.
__________________
She loves you, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah!
She loves you, yeah!
how do you know?
how do you know?

CraigSca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 11:10 AM   #14
Pumpy Tudors
Bounty Hunter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigSca
John Elway

Yeah, I hate that bastard, too.

__________________
No, I am not Batman, and I will not repair your food processor.
Pumpy Tudors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 11:21 AM   #15
Solecismic
Solecismic Software
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Canton, OH
I'm sure he's read the studies that show that a RB's career is much shorter than that of any other position, and it's based on number of carries. So he probably figures a holdout causes very little long-term damage.

Maybe he's looking at the 2006 draft, comparing himself favorably to DeAngelo Williams, and thinking he'll go #3, behind Leinart and Ferguson.
Solecismic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 11:25 AM   #16
MrBug708
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Whittier
Not a chance Bensen would go 3rd next year. Not with Reggie Bush/Lendale White coming out
MrBug708 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 11:28 AM   #17
Honolulu_Blue
Hockey Boy
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
To look on the bright side (which I hope there isn't one), Barry Sanders didn't sign his first contract until like a few days before the first regular season game. He had a decent career. All is not lost (though I hope it is).
__________________
Steve Yzerman: 1,755 points in 1,514 regular season games. 185 points in 196 postseason games. A First-Team All-Star, Conn Smythe Trophy winner, Selke Trophy winner, Masterton Trophy winner, member of the Hockey Hall of Fame, Olympic gold medallist, and a three-time Stanley Cup Champion. Longest serving captain of one team in the history of the NHL (19 seasons).
Honolulu_Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 11:28 AM   #18
rkmsuf
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
not only that but are you going to take a guy like that and jeopardize a first round pick on a position that really isn't in high demand
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales
rkmsuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 11:38 AM   #19
rexallllsc
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lathum
what's up with texas running backs?

They get their ass-kissed for years and it spoils them.
rexallllsc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 11:57 AM   #20
nilodor
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: calgary, AB
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevew
How far apart is he with the Bears? If they are offering like 10 million in guarantees, and you think you're worth 18 million, its one thing, but if the difference is only a few 1-2 million, sign the damn contract and play by now. You lose more money by not playing in the long run.

I think the real problem is benson's agent, who is also Hines Ward's agent. This guy wants to be Rosenhaus, but he aint. Apparently his holdout bullshit got a good contract for Andre Wadsworth a few years back, and he thinks it will work again.

I don't remember the numbers exactly but from what I've heard it works out that the guy picked ahead of him is getting 16 million, the guy behind him is getting 14 million and the bears are offering 15 million.

The hold out is because Benson wants to be slotted off what Phillip Rivers received last year, which is stupid because quarterback are not counted in slotting. The other reason that has been floating around is benson is worried that this will be his only chance at a big contract because of what happened to Edge and Alexander, where their teams said that they were too old to get big money over a long term deal.
nilodor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 12:06 PM   #21
moriarty
College Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: A negative place
Quote:
Originally Posted by nilodor
I don't remember the numbers exactly but from what I've heard it works out that the guy picked ahead of him is getting 16 million, the guy behind him is getting 14 million and the bears are offering 15 million.

The hold out is because Benson wants to be slotted off what Phillip Rivers received last year, which is stupid because quarterback are not counted in slotting. The other reason that has been floating around is benson is worried that this will be his only chance at a big contract because of what happened to Edge and Alexander, where their teams said that they were too old to get big money over a long term deal.

Damn, 15 million sounds like 'big money' to me ...
moriarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 12:08 PM   #22
dixieflatline
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by nilodor
The other reason that has been floating around is benson is worried that this will be his only chance at a big contract because of what happened to Edge and Alexander, where their teams said that they were too old to get big money over a long term deal.

To expand on this. From what I hear(semi-inside source) they are fairly close on total money but not close on the distribution of the funds and also not close on the length of the contract. Benson is looking for a 4 year deal tops and the bears want 5 years. Part of the reason Angelos came out last week and said they weren't going to give him more money than their current offer is because he knew they were close on that front and could say that to look tough.
dixieflatline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 12:25 PM   #23
stevew
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
Quote:
Originally Posted by nilodor
I don't remember the numbers exactly but from what I've heard it works out that the guy picked ahead of him is getting 16 million, the guy behind him is getting 14 million and the bears are offering 15 million.

The hold out is because Benson wants to be slotted off what Phillip Rivers received last year, which is stupid because quarterback are not counted in slotting. The other reason that has been floating around is benson is worried that this will be his only chance at a big contract because of what happened to Edge and Alexander, where their teams said that they were too old to get big money over a long term deal.

Edge and Alexander are still making, what, like 8 million this season each? Obviously not as good as having a 4-5 year deal with major bonus's, and little chance of being cut due to a massive cap charge.
stevew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 02:35 PM   #24
Galaxy
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
The NFL needs to take a page from the NBA and have rookie contracts set.
Galaxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 02:44 PM   #25
mhass
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here
$17 million guaranteed is the current offer.
__________________
Now while I wasn't able to cut everyone I wanted to, I have cut a lot of you. - H.J.S.

mhass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 02:45 PM   #26
HomerJSimpson
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Springfield, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galaxy
The NFL needs to take a page from the NBA and have rookie contracts set.


Agreed.
HomerJSimpson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 02:46 PM   #27
Coffee Warlord
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Colorado Springs
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galaxy
The NFL needs to take a page from the NBA and have rookie contracts set.

Supposedly this will happen (at least, it's moderately likely) in the next CBA.
Coffee Warlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 02:49 PM   #28
rkmsuf
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhass
$17 million guaranteed is the current offer.


OH, IT'S A PROFIT DEAL!!
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales
rkmsuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 02:51 PM   #29
bhlloy
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
As long as that's all they take from the NBA I'd be ecstatic.
I wonder what effect it would have on the overall standard of play in the league as I bet every year very serviceable veterans get cut to fit a higher priced rookie into the team. Or is that overestimating things?
bhlloy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 02:55 PM   #30
HomerJSimpson
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Springfield, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhlloy
As long as that's all they take from the NBA I'd be ecstatic.
I wonder what effect it would have on the overall standard of play in the league as I bet every year very serviceable veterans get cut to fit a higher priced rookie into the team. Or is that overestimating things?


Not really. I don't imagine that the CBA cap for rookies would be low enough to make much of a difference on that. I would guess it would be the same kind of money that rookies are getting now per year, save maybe shorter contracts to allow them to negotiate a new contract earlier. It will at least prevent hold-outs in the rookies first camp (which basically is one of the most important camps of a players career).

Last edited by HomerJSimpson : 08-25-2005 at 02:55 PM.
HomerJSimpson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 02:59 PM   #31
gstelmack
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by HomerJSimpson
Not really. I don't imagine that the CBA cap for rookies would be low enough to make much of a difference on that. I would guess it would be the same kind of money that rookies are getting now per year, save maybe shorter contracts to allow them to negotiate a new contract earlier. It will at least prevent hold-outs in the rookies first camp (which basically is one of the most important camps of a players career).

Note that there is ALREADY a rookie cap that limits how much each team can spend. The problem (?) right now is that teams have discretion on how to divvy that pool money up among their picks, which leads to some picks making outrageous demands. Teams don't have the flexibility they used to, but the players do.

I'd love to see a formalized slotting system that specified exactly how much and for how long each pick's contract is. There is already an informal system that works well for most picks, but a handful of bad apples mess it up. Formalize it and not much will change except that a handful of the bad apples (say, Philip Rivers last year) will just sign the contract, while whiners like Benson can still choose not to sign and wait for next year's draft to hope a better situation comes along.
__________________
-- Greg
-- Author of various FOF utilities
gstelmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 03:01 PM   #32
HomerJSimpson
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Springfield, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by gstelmack
Note that there is ALREADY a rookie cap that limits how much each team can spend. The problem (?) right now is that teams have discretion on how to divvy that pool money up among their picks, which leads to some picks making outrageous demands. Teams don't have the flexibility they used to, but the players do.

I'd love to see a formalized slotting system that specified exactly how much and for how long each pick's contract is. There is already an informal system that works well for most picks, but a handful of bad apples mess it up. Formalize it and not much will change except that a handful of the bad apples (say, Philip Rivers last year) will just sign the contract, while whiners like Benson can still choose not to sign and wait for next year's draft to hope a better situation comes along.


Ummm...I know about the cap "pool", and what you are describing is what we were talking about. If the money was officially "slotted," I really doubt players like Benson would be willing to sit a year.
HomerJSimpson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 03:04 PM   #33
rkmsuf
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by HomerJSimpson
Ummm...I know about the cap "pool", and what you are describing is what we were talking about. If the money was officially "slotted," I really doubt players like Benson would be willing to sit a year.

I don't see the problem. If he sits the year there is no way he get's close to the current offer next year. He's a nutball if he sits out and the Bears saved themselves 15 million bucks.
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales
rkmsuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 03:04 PM   #34
gstelmack
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by HomerJSimpson
Ummm...I know about the cap "pool", and what you are describing is what we were talking about. If the money was officially "slotted," I really doubt players like Benson would be willing to sit a year.

Okay. It looked like you were discussing possibly having rookies get less money, and I don't think that's the case.
__________________
-- Greg
-- Author of various FOF utilities
gstelmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 03:26 PM   #35
Raven Hawk
College Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Thunderdome
This guy's a jackass. Trade him. Trade him now.
__________________
Owner of The Shreveport Pride in The CFL
Raven Hawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 03:36 PM   #36
Coffee Warlord
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Colorado Springs
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raven Hawk
This guy's a jackass. Trade him. Trade him now.

Concur.
Coffee Warlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 03:40 PM   #37
cubboyroy1826
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
From what i understand from a good source the agent has in no uncertain terms said this deal should be done but other advisors want more. The agent said he does not push his clients either way he just gives them their options and wants them to make their owne decision. I dont know if it is family members or what. Benson is said to have gotten the last contract offer from the Bears and told his agent "I really expected more". As for the difference my source says it is 1-2 million apart and 1 year on the contract.
cubboyroy1826 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 03:46 PM   #38
Scarecrow
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Flatlands of America
According to my favorite football website: http://asp.usatoday.com/sports/footb...s/default.aspx


Wonder if Benson is better than the Priest??? And why does Cederic have to ruin a perfectly great last name ??
__________________
Post Count: Eleventy Billion - so deal with it!
Scarecrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 03:49 PM   #39
Coffee Warlord
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Colorado Springs
Benson has no idea how ruthless the fans are going to be to him if he DOES wind up signing in Chicago.
Coffee Warlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 03:55 PM   #40
Wolfpack
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
I do have to stick up for my fellow alum Rivers a little bit. SD's offerings last year during his holdout were ridiculously lowball and Ricky Williams-esque in escalator clauses. True, he missed out on camp and it may ultimately have cost him any chance of starting in SD as Brees has now decided he likes his job and has done wonders with it since Rivers showed up. But, Rivers wasn't being a total pill about holding out.
Wolfpack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 04:29 PM   #41
maximus
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Where the system is screwed
A radio station (670 The Score) in Chicago just announced that Benson is in Chicago and has been since early this morning. They are saying that Benson is very close to signing.
maximus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 04:38 PM   #42
Crapshoot
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Roffle- he's a jackass for trying to maximise his value ? His career, his market value - not yours.

Last edited by Crapshoot : 08-25-2005 at 04:41 PM.
Crapshoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 04:51 PM   #43
dixieflatline
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by cubboyroy1826
As for the difference my source says it is 1-2 million apart and 1 year on the contract.

This is what I'm hearing from the bears side too. Interesting. I'm hearing that the 1 year is a MUCH bigger problem than the 1-2 mil though.
dixieflatline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 05:18 PM   #44
maximus
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Where the system is screwed
More news reported on 670 The Score:

Cedirc Benson has shown up at Halas Hall with his baseball agent Brian Peters and not his football agent Eugene Parker. Word is that Benson is extrememly upset with Eugene Parker (Bensons football agent). Sounds as if Benson didn not want to hold out this long and in fact it was Parkers idea. There were no negotiations today however...
maximus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 05:24 PM   #45
Huckleberry
College Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
I just noticed that my post is the first time on this thread that Cedric Benson's first name has been spelled correctly.

Just funny.
__________________
The one thing all your failed relationships have in common is you.

The Barking Carnival (Longhorn-centered sports blog)
College Football Adjusted Stats and Ratings
Huckleberry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 05:30 PM   #46
ice4277
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkley, MI: The Hotbed of FOFC!
Quote:
Originally Posted by maximus
More news reported on 670 The Score:

Cedirc Benson has shown up at Halas Hall with his baseball agent Brian Peters and not his football agent Eugene Parker. Word is that Benson is extrememly upset with Eugene Parker (Bensons football agent). Sounds as if Benson didn not want to hold out this long and in fact it was Parkers idea. There were no negotiations today however...

See, I would tend to call shenanigans on this one. I find it laughable that a holdout can last this long against a player's wishes. Especially one who has another agent who can advise him. If the guy really didn't want to hold out, he could have escalated the situation earlier, and taken steps to end it a (relatively speaking) long time ago.
ice4277 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 05:46 PM   #47
gstelmack
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfpack
I do have to stick up for my fellow alum Rivers a little bit. SD's offerings last year during his holdout were ridiculously lowball and Ricky Williams-esque in escalator clauses. True, he missed out on camp and it may ultimately have cost him any chance of starting in SD as Brees has now decided he likes his job and has done wonders with it since Rivers showed up. But, Rivers wasn't being a total pill about holding out.

Oh, I love Rivers (I think he was definitely a top QB in the draft and can be a great NFL QB, the guy does nothing but win), and don't think the whole thing was entirely his fault. But, had he shown up, he'd probably have started and in a couple of seasons would be commanding huge money. Now he has to hope Brees falters or he gets traded, or it will be a while before he gets a chance to prove himself.
__________________
-- Greg
-- Author of various FOF utilities
gstelmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 07:01 PM   #48
Huckleberry
College Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
31-17 (D1A opponents) is "nothing but win"?
__________________
The one thing all your failed relationships have in common is you.

The Barking Carnival (Longhorn-centered sports blog)
College Football Adjusted Stats and Ratings
Huckleberry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 07:33 PM   #49
maximus
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Where the system is screwed
Quote:
Originally Posted by dixieflatline
This is what I'm hearing from the bears side too. Interesting. I'm hearing that the 1 year is a MUCH bigger problem than the 1-2 mil though.


You guys are hearing that the Bears only want him signed for one year? Or am I misunderstanding?
maximus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 07:40 PM   #50
RailsFS
Mascot
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry
31-17 (D1A opponents) is "nothing but win"?
Well, at a program like NC State, it is.
RailsFS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.