![]() |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Keene, NH
|
Something I didn't know
I had no idea the Cowboys didn't retire the number of Ring of Honor players.
I just about fell out of my chair yesterday when I saw some dude wearing Tony Dorsett's number.
__________________
Mile High Hockey |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
The Maple Leafs are similar, they only retire the numbers of player who died tragically -- Ace Bailey and Bobby Baun being the only ones so far. They "honor" numbers but do not retire them, which results in travesties like Sittler's #27 being worn by people like Lucien Deblois and John Kordic.
(Of course, some numbers just wind up being de facto retired. No Leaf was ever worn Clark's #17 in the various years he's been retired or on other teams.)
__________________
Down Goes Brown: Toronto Maple Leafs Humor and Analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Keene, NH
|
Quote:
yeah, I don't really like the death thing. I think it is a really, really terrific gesture for a team to honor an Ace Bailey, but I guess I'm just a grinch or something because I really think that a number should be retired only after a lengthy career of greatness for a particular team, not for a death. by the same token, nobody on the Leafs should be wearing Darryl Sittler's number, and nobody on the Cowboys should be wearing #33. I didn't even like Brett Hull wearing his dad's retired number. And you can be certain I didn't like Jerry Rice wearing Steve Largent's number.
__________________
Mile High Hockey |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|