$47 Sandwich has 30,000 Calories!

DanGarion · 11-04-2005, 03:28 PM

hxxp://www.sitepalace.com/derian/ - Site has popups which is why I just included a picture and what's in it.

Food ------------------------ Calories
Fried Mushrooms – 15 -------- 450
Bacon – 14 pieces ----------- 990
Onion rings – 18 ------------ 1140
Ground Beef – 1/4 lb. ------- 293
Corndogs – 2 ---------------- 540
Swiss Cheese – 4 slices ----- 425
Provolone Cheese – 4 slices - 397
Cheddar Cheese – 4 slices --- 455
Sliced Ham – 1/4 lb. -------- 184
Sliced Turkey – 1/4 lb. ----- 181
Pastrami – 1/4 lb. ---------- 394
Sliced Roast Beef – 1/4 lb. - 200
Bratwurst – 1 --------------- 510
Braunschweiger – 1/4 lb. ---- 580
Wheat Bread – 1 lb. --------- 1030
Lettuce – 1/2 head ---------- 25
Feta Cheese – 4 oz. --------- 350
Italian Salad Dressing – 6 oz 480
Oregeno – 50 grams ---------- 438
Salt & Pepper – 50 grams ---- 0
Butter – 1/2 lb. ------------ 1600
Parmesan Cheese – 100 grams - 465
Canola Oil – 154 Tbsp. ------ 18,432
Total ----------------------- 29,559

KevinNU7 · 11-04-2005, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dangarion

Food ------------------------ Calories
Canola Oil – 154 Tbsp. ------ 18,432

Unless people actually drink the Canola Oil they should have that much in the food

rkmsuf · 11-04-2005, 03:30 PM

Is 154 tbsp of conola oil really necessary.

DanGarion · 11-04-2005, 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevinNU7

Unless people actually drink the Canola Oil they should have that much in the food

Yeah, I'm not sure where he got that from unless he washed it down with the Canola Oil.

Raiders Army · 11-04-2005, 03:32 PM

That's not 30,000 calories. It's 441 calories short!

gstelmack · 11-04-2005, 03:37 PM

They probably used 154 tb of canola oil to fry the onion rings. No way there is that much actually in the sandwich. Same with the butter.

DanGarion · 11-04-2005, 03:46 PM

Looking at the pictures he fried just about everything possible...

JasonC23 · 11-04-2005, 03:48 PM

And a Diet Coke, please.

WSUCougar · 11-04-2005, 03:49 PM

It was as if millions of arteries cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced.

QuikSand · 11-04-2005, 03:51 PM

Taco Town!

Raiders Army · 11-04-2005, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WSUCougar

It was as if millions of arteries cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced.

Very nice.

QuikSand · 11-04-2005, 03:58 PM

There is definitely something afoot with the calorie count... I don't think onion rings are all that chock full of calories unless you count the contribution from the oil they are fried in... and then re-counting the oil itself as a stand-alone is cheating.

By the same logic, one onion ring fried in that much oil would have 20,000 calories on its own. Silly.

Farrah Whitworth-Rahn · 11-04-2005, 04:04 PM

I'm glad to see they used the healthier wheat bread.

Pumpy Tudors · 11-04-2005, 04:05 PM

Farrah, I would pay you $100 just to watch you eat that sandwich.

(food fetish)

moriarty · 11-04-2005, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dangarion

Looking at the pictures he fried just about everything possible...

MMm... reminds me of that place in New York that sells fried Twinkees and other such stuff. Yumm.

Farrah Whitworth-Rahn · 11-04-2005, 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pumpy Tudors

Farrah, I would pay you $100 just to watch you eat that sandwich.

(food fetish)

Would you want your $100 back if I puked after?

Pumpy Tudors · 11-04-2005, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Farrah Whitworth-Rahn

Would you want your $100 back if I puked after?

You win.

AlexB · 11-04-2005, 07:39 PM

A sandwich for $47 should have a lot of calories, you're paying a lot of money, you don't want some namby pamby health food, you want the full artery clogging, greasy skin, heart attack inducing effects. Anything less than a near black out and I'd be demanding my money back

Samdari · 11-04-2005, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Farrah Whitworth-Rahn

Would you want your $100 back if I puked after?

You should actually charge extra for that. $100 to watch you puke after, $200 to puke on him.

Farrah Whitworth-Rahn · 11-04-2005, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samdari

You should actually charge extra for that. $100 to watch you puke after, $200 to puke on him.

Excellent idea. I need the money. Christmas is coming.

Bearcat729 · 11-04-2005, 09:09 PM

Can I get it on white bread without the mushrooms and Braunschweiger?

(Yes I must have a death wish)

st.cronin · 11-04-2005, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Farrah Whitworth-Rahn

Excellent idea. I need the money. Christmas is coming.

Not to mention college.

panerd · 11-04-2005, 09:38 PM

I don't get the $47 price tag. I always look at things as meal unit costs. Like a $15 pizza might last 2 and half meals so it's unit cost is like $6 a meal. I always look at a $7 Taco Bell meal as the basis for a good meal. I don't see how I could get 6 or 7 meals out of that sandwich. Each of the seven meals justs looks like a few onion rings, a small slice of bread, a few cold cuts, and about 3000 calories worth of canola oil. I don't get the $47 at all.

B & B · 11-04-2005, 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by panerd

I always look at a $7 Taco Bell meal as the basis for a good meal. .

Sir, weve isolated the problem individual and await further instructions...

Samdari · 11-06-2005, 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Farrah Whitworth-Rahn

Excellent idea. I need the money. Christmas is coming.

You know, a thought occurred to me about this. Instead of puking on people for cash, maybe you could get your husband to write a computer game. And then, release it. People would theoretically pay money to download it and play it on their computers.

Farrah Whitworth-Rahn · 11-06-2005, 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samdari

You know, a thought occurred to me about this. Instead of puking on people for cash, maybe you could get your husband to write a computer game. And then, release it. People would theoretically pay money to download it and play it on their computers.

Huh.That thought never occurred to me. I'll have to talk to him about that.

Dutch · 11-06-2005, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuikSand

and then re-counting the oil itself as a stand-alone is cheating.

Man, we could go in so many different directions with that comment. Can FOFC handle another thread about cheating?

11-04-2005, 03:30 PM	#3
rkmsuf Head Coach Join Date: Dec 2001	Is 154 tbsp of conola oil really necessary. __________________ "Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales

11-04-2005, 03:37 PM	#6
gstelmack Pro Starter Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Cary, NC	They probably used 154 tb of canola oil to fry the onion rings. No way there is that much actually in the sandwich. Same with the butter. __________________ -- Greg -- Author of various FOF utilities

11-04-2005, 03:46 PM	#7
DanGarion Coordinator Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: PNW	Looking at the pictures he fried just about everything possible... __________________ Los Angeles Dodgers Check out the FOFC Groups on Facebook! and Reddit! DON'T REPORT ME BRO!

11-04-2005, 03:48 PM	#8
JasonC23 High School Varsity Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Huntley, IL, USA	And a Diet Coke, please. __________________ "I'm A god. I'm not THE God...I don't think." Bill Murray, Groundhog Day

11-04-2005, 03:49 PM	#9
WSUCougar Rider Of Rohan Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Port Angeles, WA or Helm's Deep	It was as if millions of arteries cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced. __________________ It's not the years...it's the mileage.

11-04-2005, 03:32 PM	#5
Raiders Army Coordinator Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: The Black Hole	That's not 30,000 calories. It's 441 calories short!

11-04-2005, 03:51 PM	#10
QuikSand lolzcat Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Annapolis, Md	Taco Town!

11-04-2005, 03:58 PM	#12
QuikSand lolzcat Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Annapolis, Md	There is definitely something afoot with the calorie count... I don't think onion rings are all that chock full of calories unless you count the contribution from the oil they are fried in... and then re-counting the oil itself as a stand-alone is cheating. By the same logic, one onion ring fried in that much oil would have 20,000 calories on its own. Silly. Last edited by QuikSand : 11-04-2005 at 04:00 PM.

11-04-2005, 04:04 PM	#13
Farrah Whitworth-Rahn Red-Headed Vixen Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Phoenix, AZ	I'm glad to see they used the healthier wheat bread.

11-04-2005, 04:05 PM	#14
Pumpy Tudors Bounty Hunter Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Pittsburgh, PA	Farrah, I would pay you $100 just to watch you eat that sandwich. (food fetish) __________________ No, I am not Batman, and I will not repair your food processor.

11-04-2005, 07:39 PM	#18
AlexB Pro Starter Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Newbury, England	A sandwich for $47 should have a lot of calories, you're paying a lot of money, you don't want some namby pamby health food, you want the full artery clogging, greasy skin, heart attack inducing effects. Anything less than a near black out and I'd be demanding my money back __________________ 'A song is a beautiful lie', Idlewild, Self Healer. When you're smiling, the whole world smiles with you. Sports!

11-04-2005, 09:09 PM	#21
Bearcat729 College Benchwarmer Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Cincinnati, Ohio	Can I get it on white bread without the mushrooms and Braunschweiger? (Yes I must have a death wish)

11-04-2005, 09:38 PM	#23
panerd Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: St. Louis	I don't get the $47 price tag. I always look at things as meal unit costs. Like a $15 pizza might last 2 and half meals so it's unit cost is like $6 a meal. I always look at a $7 Taco Bell meal as the basis for a good meal. I don't see how I could get 6 or 7 meals out of that sandwich. Each of the seven meals justs looks like a few onion rings, a small slice of bread, a few cold cuts, and about 3000 calories worth of canola oil. I don't get the $47 at all.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)