![]() |
|
|
#1 | |||
|
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Reggie Bush wears No. 5 in Saints Camp
Link
Quote:
So..what are the thoughts on this? Is it time for the NFL to change this uniform number rule or not?
__________________
Current dynasty: Playtesting chaos (Viperball 26) | OOTP Mod: Managerial Strategy Files | GM Excel Competitive Balance Tax/Revenue Sharing Calc | FBCB Mods on Github |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Mexico
|
I think it's a really stupid rule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
lolzcat
Join Date: May 2001
Location: williamsburg, va
|
I like the rule for selfish reasons... I just like the uniformity it creates when watching a game.
__________________
Text Sports Network - Bringing you statistical information for several FOF MP leagues in one convenient site Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Green Bay, WI
|
Keep the rule mostly as-is, but build in an exemption for Top-10 draft picks to allow them to wear the number provided it isn't already taken.
A 5th-rounder should rightfully be laughed at for asking for something like that, but when you're drafting a guy to be, presumably, the new face of your franchise (or one of them), letting him keep his number without rigamarole helps the fans identify him more easily. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
College Prospect
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
|
I can't believe this is such a hot topic with the NFL to the point where talks are stalling and it's going to various committees etc etc. But regardless, couldn't the Saints just give him #5 list him as a WR?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Dearly Missed
(9/25/77-12/23/08) Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: DC Suburbs
|
He should ask to wear the symbol for the square root of 19.
__________________
NAFL New Orleans Saints GM/Co-Commish MP Career Record: 114-85 NAFL Super Bowl XI Champs In memory of Gavin Anthony: 7/22/08-7/26/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Bounty Hunter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
Quote:
With that said, I think WR's are limited to wearing numbers 10-19 and 80-89. I don't think the recent rule changes extended single digits to anyone besides quarterbacks and kickers.
__________________
No, I am not Batman, and I will not repair your food processor. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
|
It is jaw dropping to me how much people are talking about this on the Saints message boards. Whether Bush gets to wear #5 or not is THE big topic.
I don't really see what the big deal is either way, personally. If the NFL wants to keep things uniform, they should enforce the rules strictly. If they want to sell as many jerseys as possible, they should let players and agents choose numbers at will. Does it really matter in the end which way they go? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
The rule has a very valid reason -- it makes it much easier for officials to make calls on things such as illegal receivers down field and such. The only reason to change the rule is vanity and ego. I don't see what the hoopla is about -- can't these dumbasses sack it up and wear a freakin' number without breaking down sobbing or bitching about "The Man" keeping 'em down?
End rant. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
|
"Vanity" and "ego". Don't some (many?) here applaud those traits? As long as we glorify such behaviors (and buy what they are selling), it will continue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
|
I don't think any player should be allowed to have a jersey number out of their position range. But that's just personal preference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Georgia
|
What would prevent the Saints from listing Bush as a QB, but then using him as an RB anyway?
__________________
Top 10 Songs of the Year 1955-Present (1976 Added) Franchise Portfolio Draft Winner Fictional Character Draft Winner Television Family Draft Winner Build Your Own Hollywood Studio Draft Winner |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
|
Quote:
If they are going to go that route, they need to list him as a punter. Make things much nicer for the team come Franchise Tag time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland
|
Quote:
Sure...I don't know how many times officials have been confused by QB's or K's being downfield though. I think for the most part the number restrictions should stay, but I don't really see much of a reason why RB's should be excluded from wearing numbers from 1-19. Actually, when I heard about the whole #5 issue, first thing I thought of was this guy: (yes, I realize he played QB in college)
__________________
null |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
I understand the need for distinctions in eligible versus non-eligible numbers, but i've never understood the need for the even tigher restrictions.
I say let any QB, RB, FB, WR, TE, P, K wear any number in the 1-49 and 80-89 range.
__________________
Last edited by cthomer5000 : 05-13-2006 at 08:57 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Mascot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ft. Lauderdale/Miami, FL
|
This whole thing is stupid - why change the rules for him? What has he done in the NFL.
The numbers she be as they are and wideouts/ends need to go back to the 80's, not 19, 11, etc. How would you like your QB wearing number 99? It would look pretty ridiculous wouldn't it?
__________________
YO PHOENIX MAN |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
College Prospect
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
|
Quote:
Ohh, okay. I thought it was 1-19. Still, they could list him as a kicker if they really wanted to (and make a mockery of it), but I'm sure the NFL would step in at that point. Historically the NFL has frowned heavily on mockeries. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland
|
Quote:
Oh noes! ![]()
__________________
null |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Placerville, CA
|
Quote:
![]() Unavailable for comment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkeley
|
They should either change the rules for everyone or strictly enforce it... one off exceptions aren't the way to go.
Interesting side note: Edgerrin James petition to wear #5 when he was drafted 4th in '99, but was refused. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Mascot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ft. Lauderdale/Miami, FL
|
Quote:
33 is not quite as bad as 99 - is that a halfback option ![]()
__________________
YO PHOENIX MAN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
|
I kinda like the rule as is - makes it easier to pick out positions, variations in formations, etc.
As for listing Bush at another position in order to qualify him for #5, the Seahawks half-heartedly tried to do the same thing when they got Brian Bosworth, calling him a "monster defensive back" or something like that to try and get the league to allow him to wear #44. Didn't fly with the league office so he switched to #55. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
Quote:
Last edited by IwasHere : 05-13-2006 at 11:27 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
Quote:
If it's good enough for a hall-of-fame center, I say the NFL should allow it. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
Quote:
![]() Last edited by IwasHere : 05-13-2006 at 11:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
I think the rules are silly.
__________________
Current dynasty: Playtesting chaos (Viperball 26) | OOTP Mod: Managerial Strategy Files | GM Excel Competitive Balance Tax/Revenue Sharing Calc | FBCB Mods on Github |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Astoria, NY, USA
|
these guys get paid millions to play a game.
think about that for a sec - millions to play a game. they should be assigned a number and like it and shut up. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Bounty Hunter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
Quote:
__________________
No, I am not Batman, and I will not repair your food processor. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
Man, Adrian McPherson should be honored that Bush is wearing his jersey.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Quote:
Someone who richer than all of us pays them money to play a game. A game. And it's been that way for a long, long time. So that shouldn't matter. The argument that somehow going to work at Hardees or punching in from 9 to 5 is the same as playing pro sports has always been silly and always will be. Do people complain when movie stars won't sign for a movie unless they get points on the gross? Or if they don't get a bigger trailer? No, because people rarely hear about that stuff. But in sports, folks are always willing to complain that athletes are just ungrateful bastards who should be lucky they're playing a game. Look, if all of us were as good at playing a game as other pro athletes were then they might not be as special and perhaps we'd get paid millions to play games, too. But we're not, so we don't.
__________________
Current dynasty: Playtesting chaos (Viperball 26) | OOTP Mod: Managerial Strategy Files | GM Excel Competitive Balance Tax/Revenue Sharing Calc | FBCB Mods on Github |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Astoria, NY, USA
|
they weren't always gods.
there was a time when they were just guys who got paid to play a game and in the offseason they sold cars or insurance. when they wipe their ass the toilet paper turns brown, same like everyone else. a little humility and knowing-your-place never hurt no one, especially for a unproven rookie. if you see Maurice Clarett, pass this post on to him as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
H.S. Freshman Team
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
|
I say make Offensive Linemen stay within 50 - 79, make other offensive players stay out of 50-79, and let the D take whatever numbers they want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
Quote:
A lot of these minor league players have just as much talent as their Pro counterparts. They just do not have the dedication it takes to go to the next level. I love these people who sit back and complain about how much pro athletes make while eating dorritos from their Lay-z-boy recliners. When is the last time these people saw the inside of a gym? Bitch all you want, but talent alone does not make a pro athelete. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Astoria, NY, USA
|
Quote:
yeah, Barry Bonds, Mark Magwire, Sammy Sosa, Raphael Palmiero, etc. agree with that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Detroit, MI, U.S.A
|
Quote:
Owned. ![]()
__________________
It's true, it's true. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
I understand that the more liberal college rule appeals to some -- essentially, anybody playing an eligible receiver position can wear 1-49 and 80-89. There may be antiquated elements of the rule. For example, I think 1-9 originally was intended only for kickers and kicker/quarterbacks, while 10-19 were intended for quarterbacks only. 10-19 is an alternate for wide receivers and was originally intended only if 80-89 were already taken/retired. That rule has been laxed to allow alternate numbers to be primary numbers. Like dawgfan said, it makes it easier for everone to identify players and formations. I don't see the big deal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
Speaking of Rookies numerical choices, why did Vernon Davis take 85 instead of the 18 he wore in college? The rule isn't relaxed for Tight Ends, is it? I seem to remember that KW2 wore 11 for his rookie year, so I'm not sure what the deal is.
In the end, if the league thinks that it can sell a lot more jerseys by relaxing some of the restrictions, i think they will do it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
|
Quote:
I don't understand what the opposition to this would be. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
n00b
Join Date: May 2006
|
i hope they keep the rule as it is, since it makes it easier to identify players positions, but if allowing these players to wear other numbers will generate more money from the sale of jerseys,then it wouldnt surprise me if they change the rule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Where does the line form for "I really don't give a shit what number any player wears"? Strikes me as bordering on silly that there's a chart for who can wear what with the possible exception of making ineligible receivers easier to identify.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Quote:
Pretty much where I am. The only meaningful place for this, off the top of my head, is with "eligible receivers" -- past that, it doesn't really matter whether a guy is number 8, 28, or 88. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
Personally, when I was first getting into the NFL I kind of liked being able to tune into a game where I didn't know the teams well and immediately being able to figure out who was who.
__________________
Down Goes Brown: Toronto Maple Leafs Humor and Analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Fresno, CA
|
Quote:
I wouldn't have a problem with Arctus' suggestion. Of course, I don't really have a trouble with the league sticking to their current rule either. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
NFL | League to change uniform number rules
Mon, 15 May 2006 07:35:29 -0700 ESPN reports the NFL has decided to change their policy regarding uniform numbers. No details of the agreement have been disclosed. Hmm. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
Upon further review...
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Conyers GA
|
Good. No reason the NFL should have made an exception for him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
Roster Filler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cicero
|
Quote:
Agreed. I would not have a big problem with them changing the rule (although not changing it just for him) but why would they allow an exception for someone who has never played a down in the league?
__________________
http://www.nateandellie.net Now featuring twice the babies for the same low price! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | ||
|
lolzcat
Join Date: May 2001
Location: williamsburg, va
|
Quote:
This is something the NBA would do, thankfully not the NFL. The NFL continues to show that the "team" and the "league" are bigger than the player. I think this is part of what makes the NFL so much more successful than the other leagues.
__________________
Text Sports Network - Bringing you statistical information for several FOF MP leagues in one convenient site Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Conyers GA
|
Quote:
Exactly. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|