![]() |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2001
|
Trade fair value
We have a guy really wanting to trade out of the #1 pick in a fantasy draft. 10 teams.
Is there a tool or any thought to what a fair deal would be. Let's say two ways. Trading up from the 3 hole or someone trading up from 7-10.
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales Last edited by rkmsuf : 08-24-2006 at 01:29 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Dearly Missed
(9/25/77-12/23/08) Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: DC Suburbs
|
Quote:
__________________
NAFL New Orleans Saints GM/Co-Commish MP Career Record: 114-85 NAFL Super Bowl XI Champs In memory of Gavin Anthony: 7/22/08-7/26/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2001
|
Quote:
Is that applicable to both fantasy and only 10 interests? The latest general offer was swap entire draft positions and also the trading team would send 5 and 10 to the trading out owner after while getting back his 6 and 10.
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cary, NC, USA
|
1 - 3 is pretty even, and if I was #1, I'd take #3s first and secound rounder for my first and second. 7-10... that's a huge difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
College Prospect
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: York, Pa
|
Quote:
__________________
We had the $240, we had to have the puddin' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
__________________
Down Goes Brown: Toronto Maple Leafs Humor and Analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Big Ten Country
|
Quote:
I think it's assumed to be a snake draft.
__________________
Pride and Prejudice -- an FOF9 Lions dynasty, starting 1966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Big Ten Country
|
Quote:
Interesting tool. I tried all the combinations in a 12-team draft: 1-24, 2-23, 3-22, etc. and 1-24 was the best. Don't know if I agree with that.
__________________
Pride and Prejudice -- an FOF9 Lions dynasty, starting 1966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2001
|
Quote:
correct
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Quote:
There's pretty simple logic behind it, though. Pretty much any draft valuation system woudl have the incremental drop in value from pick to pick decline as you get later in the draft. Anyone could see that the difference between 1(1) and 1(2) is bigger than the difference between 7(31) and 7(32) in the NFL draft -- incremental valuation ought to be a continuum between those two extremes -- there's no specific point in a generic draft that would call for anything but a gradiated dropoff from top to bottom. So, generically speaking, the drop in value from 1.1 to fantasy pick 1.2 must be greater than the gain by moving up from 2.12 to 2.11 -- it's just an extension of the same logic. Therefore, the value of the paired picks will always be greatest for the team picking first, and lowest for the team picking last. Real drafts are not generic, but draft value systems have to be. And the only way to be sensible about it is to have the increments decline as you go down. Last edited by QuikSand : 08-24-2006 at 02:00 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
College Prospect
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: York, Pa
|
Quote:
Ahhhh. I am used to dynasty league drafts where after the first draft is a regular worst to first every round. My bad.
__________________
We had the $240, we had to have the puddin' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2001
|
I guess I can ask this another way given the structure in most drafts this year.
It's a given that tomlinson, johnson and alexander go 1,2,3. If you sit outside the top 3 do you move up here and give up your whole 5th round and have 3 picks(6.8, 6.10 and 7.1) right in a row (last pick was 4.10) based on the offer I described.
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
I think the fairest way to do a random draft for a fantasy league is to order the picks as follows:
1-12 12-1 12-1 12-1 etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Quote:
I'm not sure the specifics of your question, but if you can move from #5 to #2 or #3 and the only thing that gets messed up is the 4th and 6th round crap, I would take that deal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2001
|
Quote:
post 3 was the offer
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
So, to move up to #3, you have to slide down two rounds from the 4th to the 6th? Deal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2001
|
Quote:
No, guy with #1 wants to swap his entire draft with someone in exchange for then swapping his 6 and 11 for your 5 and 10.
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cary, NC, USA
|
Quote:
Yeah, snake draft - and per QS's point, it's this year which makes it worthwhile. Johnson - Tomlinson - Alexander are essentially even at 1-2-3. If I'm at #1, I'll gladly take whichever of those guys are left at #3 to move up two spots in the second round (which in my Yahoo drafts has been the difference between Antonio Gates and Anquan Boldin (er... maybe a bad example, Gates was a stretch imho) or Marvin Harrison and Julius Jones. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
This guy has posted so much, his fingers are about to fall off.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: In Absentia
|
Quote:
Is this a clever misdirection like the pee stain thread?
__________________
M's pitcher Miguel Batista: "Now, I feel like I've had everything. I've talked pitching with Sandy Koufax, had Kenny G play for me. Maybe if I could have an interview with God, then I'd be served. I'd be complete." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2001
|
Quote:
Oh, there's Fred...won't he be surprised.
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Quote:
With nothing but bullshit like that on the bottom half of the trade (even less than I had understood it to be), I like this for the team moving up in round one and getting into the top three, period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2001
|
Quote:
I have #3 which is ideal and have no intention of moving up. So far this offer has drawn zero interest elsewhere which is amazing me.
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PDX
|
Quote:
I use chewing gum on these rides. It filters out the pollutants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
High School JV
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hillsboro OR
|
Quote:
That guy says to trade the #1 for the #23 and #25. I'm not really into fantasy football, but that does not seem like a good trade to me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
In a standard league, with a random draft assignment, and a bunch of nitwit players -- you have to undertand that the psychological element is far greater than the practical.
A guy will sit there right when his number is pulled and wail that "oh noes, #10 is the worst possible place in this draft!" And then, when you offer to switch your entire draft from #5 with him, straight up... he says no, he'll stay at #10. And he's being honest both times. If you make a deal, and things don't work out, it reflects badly on you. If it's bad luck and it doesn't work out, it's nobody's fault. That's safer. Have fun. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
Quote:
Weird... I thought the tool was based on the NFL draft chart. I wonder if it's broken.
__________________
Down Goes Brown: Toronto Maple Leafs Humor and Analysis |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|