Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-21-2006, 09:16 AM   #1
Icy
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toledo - Spain
Biggest TV deal ever signed by a sport franchise?

Real Madrid, the most famous soccer team in the world, has just signed a new contract for it's TV rights for the next 7 years. They will receive around $1.4 Billion from now until 2013 for all their TV rights.

It has been announced here in Spain as the biggest TV rights contract ever signed by a sport franchise, not matched by any other team or sport in the world, including USA pro ones. As i don't know enough about USA sports economics, i have my doubts, is it true?

Until a few years ago, the TV rights in Spain were negotiated collectively by all the pro soccer teams but a few years ago they started to negotiate individually by each team, creating a huge gap between the top and the bottom teams, even more knowing that there is not any kind of salary cap in European soccer.
__________________



Last edited by Icy : 11-21-2006 at 09:21 AM.
Icy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 09:23 AM   #2
JonInMiddleGA
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
Off hand, I'd say it's quite possible that this is the biggest.

While some MLB teams do have lucrative TV deals (Yankees & Red Sox come to mind), I don't believe the dollar values approach the approximately $1.5 billion level of this one.

The really big money, in terms of sports & television, in the US is negotiated between the leagues and the networks, rather than team specific like this one for Real Madrid.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis
JonInMiddleGA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 09:28 AM   #3
KevinNU7
College Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Beantown
The major TV deals in the US usually involve the entire league so I don't think they come anywhere near $190M+ per year.
__________________
Boston Bashers - III.14 - (8347)
KevinNU7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 09:52 AM   #4
SirFozzie
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: The State of Insanity
and this is only for HALF of Real Madrid's games, the home ones
__________________
Check out Foz's New Video Game Site, An 8-bit Mind in an 8GB world! http://an8bitmind.com
SirFozzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 10:09 AM   #5
Crapshoot
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Madrid have become the new Man U in commercial strength - they were always the biggest name, but this is a solid step.

That being said, I look forward to future presidents blowing this money on the mediocrities of the world.
Crapshoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 03:44 PM   #6
Havok
College Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
god i hate the way Europe does sports.... thank god for american football and the salary cap.
__________________
Maniacal Misfitz - We're better than you and we know it!
Havok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 03:49 PM   #7
cartman
Death Herald
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Le stelle la notte sono grandi e luminose nel cuore profondo del Texas
Quote:
Originally Posted by Havok View Post
god i hate the way Europe does sports.... thank god for american football and the salary cap.

I think European sports behave more like "The American Way". You are rewarded for strong play by being promoted to the top level league, and you are demoted to lower level leagues for poor play. If a team doesn't have the resources to compete at a high level (either financial resources or athletic resources), then they are not kept in the top level of competition.

The US style of sports in no way represents a free market system, which we hold is such high regard as a standard of gaging how well non-Sports industries perform.
__________________
Thinkin' of a master plan
'Cuz ain't nuthin' but sweat inside my hand
So I dig into my pocket, all my money is spent
So I dig deeper but still comin' up with lint
cartman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 04:19 PM   #8
Galaxy
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
I like the European way.

I always thought the big teams, the Yankees, Manchester United, ect. owned the networks they broadcast the games on?

Last edited by Galaxy : 11-21-2006 at 04:26 PM.
Galaxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 07:20 PM   #9
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
I like the European way.

I always thought the big teams, the Yankees, Manchester United, ect. owned the networks they broadcast the games on?

The Yankees and Mets now own their own networks. Do the Red Sox actually own NESN?
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 07:26 PM   #10
SirFozzie
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: The State of Insanity
yup
__________________
Check out Foz's New Video Game Site, An 8-bit Mind in an 8GB world! http://an8bitmind.com
SirFozzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 07:29 PM   #11
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirFozzie View Post
yup

Cool. It becomes extremely hard to figure out how much money these teams are actually making when they can stash revenues within the company, and not the baseball club. I'm not sure of all the economic stuff, but I think that was a big deal in one of the labor discussions a few years back, as they couldn't figure out just how much the Yankees were making, and how it would affect revenue sharing.
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 09:44 PM   #12
JonInMiddleGA
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
I like the European way.

I always thought the big teams, the Yankees, Manchester United, ect. owned the networks they broadcast the games on?

Or, in at least a couple of cases, the teams were owned by the networks.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis
JonInMiddleGA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 10:07 PM   #13
Jonathan Ezarik
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bossier City, LA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
I like the European way.

I always thought the big teams, the Yankees, Manchester United, ect. owned the networks they broadcast the games on?

I know the big English clubs have their own channels, but I don't think they can show live league matches (not sure about the cup competitions).
Jonathan Ezarik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 10:25 PM   #14
MikeVick7
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ron, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by Havok View Post
god i hate the way Europe does sports.... thank god for american football and the salary cap.
Yup. Drove me away from the NFL...
__________________
Hattrick - Seattle Reign (224367)
MikeVick7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 AM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.