Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-24-2007, 03:38 PM   #1
SackAttack
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Green Bay, WI
Pseudo-POL: "Gays and lesbians"

Not really looking to start anything here, as my tongue is firmly in its cheek (hence the "Psuedo"), but this is prompted by a quote I read from Senator Obama regarding today's judicial confirmation:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barack Obama
Southwick has shown hostility toward civil rights and a disregard for equal rights for minorities, women, gays and lesbians.

So, uh, does anybody here support equal rights for gays, but not for lesbians?

Or perhaps the other way around?

SackAttack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 03:45 PM   #2
Bubba Wheels
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
When a liberal says "equal rights,' what they really mean is 'special rights.'
Bubba Wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 03:54 PM   #3
ThunderingHERD
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
the MPAA?
__________________
"I'm losing my edge--to better looking people... with better ideas... and more talent. And who are actually really, really nice."

"Everyone's a voyeurist--they're watching me watch them watch me right now."
ThunderingHERD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:00 PM   #4
Maple Leafs
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by SackAttack View Post
So, uh, does anybody here support equal rights for gays, but not for lesbians?
"How's this for a compromise: We allow gay marriage, but only for the lesbians. Marriage is really a chick thing anyways..." - Bill Maher
__________________
Down Goes Brown: Toronto Maple Leafs Humor and Analysis
Maple Leafs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:01 PM   #5
Kodos
Resident Alien
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba Wheels View Post
When a liberal says "equal rights,' what they really mean is 'special rights.'


Like the "special right" to get married to the person you love?
Kodos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:02 PM   #6
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba Wheels View Post
When a liberal says "equal rights,' what they really mean is 'special rights.'

What does it mean when a conservative says it? I guess I wasn't aware of all the 'special rights' gays and lesbians have. Except for the having sex with each other part that is.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:03 PM   #7
Flasch186
Coordinator
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba Wheels View Post
When a liberal says "equal rights,' what they really mean is 'special rights.'

In before the lock and banning. yes.
__________________
Jacksonville-florida-homes-for-sale

Putting a New Spin on Real Estate!



-----------------------------------------------------------

Commissioner of the USFL
USFL
Flasch186 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:05 PM   #8
miami_fan
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Land O Lakes FL
Quote:
Originally Posted by SackAttack View Post
Not really looking to start anything here, as my tongue is firmly in its cheek (hence the "Psuedo"), but this is prompted by a quote I read from Senator Obama regarding today's judicial confirmation:



So, uh, does anybody here support equal rights for gays, but not for lesbians?

Or perhaps the other way around?

You put "gays" and "lesbians" in the title and thought it was not going to start something?

Are you new here?
__________________
"Do not be indifferent in the face of historical lies. Do not be indifferent when you see the past being exploited for the needs of contemporary politics. Do not be indifferent when any minority suffers discrimination. For it's the essence of democracy that the majority wields the power, but at the same time, the rights of the minority must be respected."

Marian Turski- former prisoner of the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration and death camp
miami_fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:11 PM   #9
Bubba Wheels
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by path12 View Post
What does it mean when a conservative says it? I guess I wasn't aware of all the 'special rights' gays and lesbians have. Except for the having sex with each other part that is.

Gays and lesbians in our society already have tolerance, what they are pushing for now is obviously acceptance. You cannot force someone to believe that a certain kind of lifestyle is acceptable, but apparently that is the new mission of government in our lives.
Bubba Wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:19 PM   #10
Bubba Wheels
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Probably a flurry of PMs going back and forth to seek bannination on me for not being part of the 'hive' mentality on this. Do your worst.
Bubba Wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:19 PM   #11
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba Wheels View Post
Gays and lesbians in our society already have tolerance, what they are pushing for now is obviously acceptance. You cannot force someone to believe that a certain kind of lifestyle is acceptable, but apparently that is the new mission of government in our lives.

But.......what does any of that have to do with 'special rights'? Tolerance and acceptance don't have anything to do with law. Discrimination does however.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:22 PM   #12
Crapshoot
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba Wheels View Post
Gays and lesbians in our society already have tolerance, what they are pushing for now is obviously acceptance. You cannot force someone to believe that a certain kind of lifestyle is acceptable, but apparently that is the new mission of government in our lives.

The English language seems to confuse you again Bubba. They couldn't give 2a damn what you and your ilk think - rather, they want the right to marry the person they love. I sincerely doubt the average gay person (or hell, anyone) gives a shit what you do in your bedroom, and couldn't figure out how you being married affects them - why do you care so much what they do?
Crapshoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:22 PM   #13
Brillig
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Mountain View, California
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba Wheels View Post
Gays and lesbians in our society already have tolerance, what they are pushing for now is obviously acceptance.

Much like Bubba Wheels on this forum.
Brillig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:25 PM   #14
Bubba Wheels
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by path12 View Post
But.......what does any of that have to do with 'special rights'? Tolerance and acceptance don't have anything to do with law. Discrimination does however.

Never stops there. Heard on WOWO out of Ft. Wayne, In today that city employees are being forced by the city to 1. sign statements that they do not 'believe' that the homosexual lifestyle is wrong (clear violation of the individual's right to practice religion) and 2. City employees are being forced to attend 'sensitivity seminars and training' about the homosexual lifestyle or they lose their jobs. This is happening in a 'red state.' Clearly pushing acceptance with governmental authority and trampling on religious freedom.
Bubba Wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:27 PM   #15
duckman
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Muskogee, OK USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba Wheels View Post
Never stops there. Heard on WOWO out of Ft. Wayne, In today that city employees are being forced by the city to 1. sign statements that they do not 'believe' that the homosexual lifestyle is wrong (clear violation of the individual's right to practice religion) and 2. City employees are being forced to attend 'sensitivity seminars and training' about the homosexual lifestyle or they lose their jobs. This is happening in a 'red state.' Clearly pushing acceptance with governmental authority and trampling on religious freedom.

I like to see some proof of this.


In before the lock.....
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas Sowell
“One of the consequences of such notions as "entitlements" is that people who have contributed nothing to society feel that society owes them something, apparently just for being nice enough to grace us with their presence.”
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexis de Tocqueville
“Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude.”
duckman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:27 PM   #16
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba Wheels View Post
Never stops there. Heard on WOWO out of Ft. Wayne, In today that city employees are being forced by the city to 1. sign statements that they do not 'believe' that the homosexual lifestyle is wrong (clear violation of the individual's right to practice religion) and 2. City employees are being forced to attend 'sensitivity seminars and training' about the homosexual lifestyle or they lose their jobs. This is happening in a 'red state.' Clearly pushing acceptance with governmental authority and trampling on religious freedom.

As interesting as that is (commie Ft. Wayne bastards will probably make them treat women equally next), I'm actually just trying to figure out what exactly these 'special rights' are that gays and lesbians are asking for.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:28 PM   #17
Crapshoot
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by duckman View Post
I like to see some proof of this.


In before the lock.....

Cmon, Duckman - didn't you read the World Net Daily special edition today?
Crapshoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:30 PM   #18
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crapshoot View Post
Cmon, Duckman - didn't you read the World Net Daily special edition today?

Bat Boy is gay?
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:30 PM   #19
Bubba Wheels
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by path12 View Post
As interesting as that is (commie Ft. Wayne bastards will probably make them treat women equally next), I'm actually just trying to figure out what exactly these 'special rights' are that gays and lesbians are asking for.

Well, if homosexuals were then forced to attend church and seminars on fudamental Christian's lifestyles (or orthodox religions in general, none accept the 'gay lifestyle"), then it would approach 'equal', no?
Bubba Wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:32 PM   #20
cuervo72
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flasch
In before the lock and banning. yes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crapshoot View Post
The English language seems to confuse you again Bubba. They couldn't give 2a damn what you and your ilk think - rather, they want the right to marry the person they love. I sincerely doubt the average gay person (or hell, anyone) gives a shit what you do in your bedroom, and couldn't figure out how you being married affects them - why do you care so much what they do?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillig View Post
Much like Bubba Wheels on this forum.

Seems to me right or wrong Bubba IS being pushed to accept this line (not by gays or lesbians directly, mind you) of thinking, if he doesn't want to be a) called stupid, b) shouted down, c) called to be banned or d) otherwise demonized. Now, Bubba admittedly does have a track record of being, well, you know...Bubba, but just sayin'.
__________________
null
cuervo72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:33 PM   #21
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba Wheels View Post
Well, if homosexuals were then forced to attend church and seminars on fudamental Christian's lifestyles (or orthodox religions in general, none accept the 'gay lifestyle"), then it would approach 'equal', no?


So you're equating the 'gay lifestyle' with persecution of fundamentalist Christians?

I can see the similarities. I certainly hope you fundamentalists can someday get married.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:33 PM   #22
Neon_Chaos
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Parañaque, Philippines
Live and let live.
__________________
Come and see.
Neon_Chaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:33 PM   #23
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Oh, and the beatings. The fundamentalist drive by bashings everywhere just break my heart.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:35 PM   #24
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuervo72 View Post
Seems to me right or wrong Bubba IS being pushed to accept this line (not by gays or lesbians directly, mind you) of thinking, if he doesn't want to be a) called stupid, b) shouted down, c) called to be banned or d) otherwise demonized. Now, Bubba admittedly does have a track record of being, well, you know...Bubba, but just sayin'.

I've got no problem with his viewpoint, he's welcome to that. I'm just trying to understand. It's a liberal thing, I guess.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.

Last edited by path12 : 10-24-2007 at 04:36 PM.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:36 PM   #25
Bubba Wheels
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by path12 View Post
Oh, and the beatings. The fundamentalist drive by bashings everywhere just break my heart.


Don't leave out all the mysterious church burnings around the country. Who would be angry enough at Christians to do that?
Bubba Wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:38 PM   #26
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba Wheels View Post
Don't leave out all the mysterious church burnings around the country. Who would be angry enough at Christians to do that?

Let me guess. Gays and lesbians? Or just liberals? Maybe BOTH!
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:38 PM   #27
Neon_Chaos
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Parañaque, Philippines
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba Wheels View Post
Don't leave out all the mysterious church burnings around the country. Who would be angry enough at Christians to do that?

Osama.
__________________
Come and see.
Neon_Chaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:40 PM   #28
Bubba Wheels
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by path12 View Post
So you're equating the 'gay lifestyle' with persecution of fundamentalist Christians?

I can see the similarities. I certainly hope you fundamentalists can someday get married.

Well, as stated before in other threads, marriage is a Biblical thing. The state saw the benefit of marriage and sanctioned it for their benefit. To allow 'gay marriage' would be no different than taking, say, the Muslim event of Ramadan and using it to promote the pork industry.
Bubba Wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:41 PM   #29
ThunderingHERD
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba Wheels View Post
Don't leave out all the mysterious church burnings around the country. Who would be angry enough at Christians to do that?

lol. teh gays? lol. lol.
__________________
"I'm losing my edge--to better looking people... with better ideas... and more talent. And who are actually really, really nice."

"Everyone's a voyeurist--they're watching me watch them watch me right now."
ThunderingHERD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:41 PM   #30
Bubba Wheels
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neon_Chaos View Post
Osama.
Yes, Osama is a much better friend to the homosexual.
Bubba Wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:42 PM   #31
Bubba Wheels
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThunderingHERD View Post
lol. teh gays? lol. lol.


Yes, groups like ACT UP do spend their time handing out Teddy Bears to sick kids at the local hospitals. Silly me.
Bubba Wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:43 PM   #32
cuervo72
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland
Quote:
Originally Posted by path12 View Post
I've got no problem with his viewpoint, he's welcome to that. I'm just trying to understand. It's a liberal thing, I guess.

Noted. My real beef was that there was a call for a banning before Bubba much said anything. Track record I guess.

(of course now that he's gone into some of his theories....)
__________________
null
cuervo72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:44 PM   #33
Klinglerware
College Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The DMV
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba Wheels View Post
Don't leave out all the mysterious church burnings around the country. Who would be angry enough at Christians to do that?

Other Christians?

http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/03/08/alabama.churches/
Klinglerware is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:44 PM   #34
Neon_Chaos
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Parañaque, Philippines
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba Wheels View Post
Well, as stated before in other threads, marriage is a Biblical thing. The state saw the benefit of marriage and sanctioned it for their benefit. To allow 'gay marriage' would be no different than taking, say, the Muslim event of Ramadan and using it to promote the pork industry.

So, Bubba, to you, there is no distinction between the civil contract of marriage, and the religious ceremony of marriage?
__________________
Come and see.
Neon_Chaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:44 PM   #35
Bubba Wheels
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuervo72 View Post
Noted. My real beef was that there was a call for a banning before Bubba much said anything. Track record I guess.

(of course now that he's gone into some of his theories....)

Theories? Geez, its my religious beliefs that should be driving you up the wall!
Bubba Wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:46 PM   #36
sabotai
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Satellite of Love
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba Wheels View Post
Don't leave out all the mysterious church burnings around the country. Who would be angry enough at Christians to do that?

God?
sabotai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:46 PM   #37
Bubba Wheels
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klinglerware View Post


Well, the Methodists do look kind of cross-eyed at the Baptists sometimes.
Bubba Wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:47 PM   #38
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba Wheels View Post
Well, as stated before in other threads, marriage is a Biblical thing. The state saw the benefit of marriage and sanctioned it for their benefit. To allow 'gay marriage' would be no different than taking, say, the Muslim event of Ramadan and using it to promote the pork industry.

Well, this is an amusing tangent, especially for my gay friends who go to church far more than I, but maybe we should get back to the original question.

You stated that liberals didn't believe in 'equal rights' for gays and lesbians but instead wanted them to have 'special rights'.

'Special rights' signifies some rights that go beyond equality (which I believe you defined as tolerance, which I don't get but that's a whole other thread right there). So what I'm trying to find out from you is this: What exactly are these 'special rights' that gays and lesbians are asking for that they should not have?
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:47 PM   #39
Passacaglia
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Big Ten Country
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuervo72 View Post
Noted. My real beef was that there was a call for a banning before Bubba much said anything. Track record I guess.

(of course now that he's gone into some of his theories....)

I think that banning comment was just a joke, not an actual call for him to be banned.
Passacaglia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:47 PM   #40
Crapshoot
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba Wheels View Post
Well, as stated before in other threads, marriage is a Biblical thing. The state saw the benefit of marriage and sanctioned it for their benefit. To allow 'gay marriage' would be no different than taking, say, the Muslim event of Ramadan and using it to promote the pork industry.

Except its not. The concept of marriage existed before Christianity did, from ancient Egypt, to the Greeks, and what not. If anything, Christianity (like other religions) co-opted a standard social contract.
Crapshoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:47 PM   #41
Bubba Wheels
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neon_Chaos View Post
So, Bubba, to you, there is no distinction between the civil contract of marriage, and the religious ceremony of marriage?


Yes, one is called 'civil union', the other is called 'marriage.'
Bubba Wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:48 PM   #42
Passacaglia
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Big Ten Country
Quote:
Originally Posted by path12 View Post
Well, this is an amusing tangent, especially for my gay friends who go to church far more than I, but maybe we should get back to the original question.

You stated that liberals didn't believe in 'equal rights' for gays and lesbians but instead wanted them to have 'special rights'.

'Special rights' signifies some rights that go beyond equality (which I believe you defined as tolerance, which I don't get but that's a whole other thread right there). So what I'm trying to find out from you is this: What exactly are these 'special rights' that gays and lesbians are asking for that they should not have?

I think it's that only the gays are allowed to marry people of their own gender, while straight folk are not?
Passacaglia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:51 PM   #43
Greyroofoo
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Alabama
Quote:
Originally Posted by path12 View Post
Let me guess. Gays and lesbians? Or just liberals? Maybe BOTH!

You know as well as I do that Hillary Clinton is behind it all! The damn liberal media won't say anything about it all.



In before the lock.
Greyroofoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:51 PM   #44
Bubba Wheels
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crapshoot View Post
Except its not. The concept of marriage existed before Christianity did, from ancient Egypt, to the Greeks, and what not. If anything, Christianity (like other religions) co-opted a standard social contract.

Yes, it did exist before Christianity did...they were called "the Jews' and its all recorded in the Old Testement. Thanks for clearing that up!
Bubba Wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:52 PM   #45
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Passacaglia View Post
I think it's that only the gays are allowed to marry people of their own gender, while straight folk are not?

Well, that's what I originally thought.....but that strikes me as an 'equal right' rather than a 'special right', though I could be wrong. I also thought that maybe it would involve being able to get information about a partner in the hospital or something like that......but that seems an 'equal right' also.

I'm just damn confused.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:53 PM   #46
Noop
Bonafide Seminole Fan
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Florida
If gay people want to get married then they should be able. However if some church refuses to hold the ceremony then it is their right to do so.
__________________
Living in an Oligarchy.
Noop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:53 PM   #47
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greyroofoo View Post
You know as well as I do that Hillary Clinton is behind it all! The damn liberal media won't say anything about it all.

Interesting. I was leaning Dumbledore.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:54 PM   #48
cuervo72
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Passacaglia View Post
I think that banning comment was just a joke, not an actual call for him to be banned.

I'm never quite sure with Flasch...
__________________
null
cuervo72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:55 PM   #49
Passacaglia
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Big Ten Country
Quote:
Originally Posted by path12 View Post
Well, that's what I originally thought.....but that strikes me as an 'equal right' rather than a 'special right', though I could be wrong. I also thought that maybe it would involve being able to get information about a partner in the hospital or something like that......but that seems an 'equal right' also.

I'm just damn confused.

I was pretty much joking -- I mean, straight people aren't allowed to marry people of their own gender? You know, since they wouldn't want to do that, and if they did, then they'd be gay, thus having that right..eh.

Seems like most of the past few jobs that lurker and I have had allow you to insure a 'domestic partner' -- I don't think the gumment is forcing them to do that.
Passacaglia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:56 PM   #50
Abe Sargent
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Catonsville, MD
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba Wheels View Post
Yes, it did exist before Christianity did...they were called "the Jews' and its all recorded in the Old Testement. Thanks for clearing that up!

His point is that marriage existed outside the Judeo-Christian envelope long ago.
__________________
Check out my two current weekly Magic columns!

https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent
Abe Sargent is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.