![]() |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
|
Ping: Flere
I finally figured out your username. I'm reading it right now, but The Use of Weapons and Inversions were both better.
![]() Last edited by Crapshoot : 10-29-2007 at 11:17 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin, TX
|
Agree on the first, disagree on the second. I'd rank Player of Games 3rd, behind Use of Weapons and Phlebas. Either way, Banks is awesome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
|
Yeah, I'm a huge banks fan.
My rankings: 1) Use of Weapons - I don't think is debatable. Possibly the best sci-book of the last 10-15 years - and easily one of the best of all time 2) Consider Phelbas 3) Excession 4) Inversions 5) Player of Games (so far) 6) Look to Windward - just not that big a fan, IMO - the weakest Banks' novel. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Heh - nice! I'm glad you enjoyed it!
PoG is probably my favorite of his sci-fi. My favorite of his fiction is probably Espedair Street, which is considerably lighter than a lot of his other fiction. I managed to see him at a book signing when Excession came out in Oxford and have my copy of that book signed by him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
|
Quote:
Really? More than the Use of Weapons? Every Banks fan I've ever talked to seems to think Use is the best one. I suppose once I'm done with PoG I'll be able to compare more fully, but the main character simply isn't as... compelling ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Well, for me it's clearly not about the main character.
![]() No, in all seriousness, I'm not sure why I like PoG better, and it's a close run between the two and Phlebas. I guess in the end I like them all for different reasons. BTW, his newest Sci-Fi, The Algebraist, is really excellent as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
|
Finished it last night. I don't think the narrator "revelation" was a big surprise at all, and the twist was less of a "Banksian" twist IMO (again, I was spoiled because Use of Weapons was the first book I read). The concept was clear, but the execution wasn't as... dynamic, IMO. Still, light years better than most of the dreg that passes as science fiction.
Read the Algebraist - enjoyed that one a fair amount. I found another one of his non-culture books that was pretty good - Against a dark background. At this point, the only sci-fi one I haven't read is Feersum Endjin, because I know reading the "phonetic" style will drive me nuts. P.S - he is new book is out in 6 months - and he's said its going to be nuts - appendix needed. (Matter is the name, I believe). Last edited by Crapshoot : 10-30-2007 at 09:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
|
http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue274/interview.html
Good interview btw. For those of you who aren't familiar with Banks, I can say with ease that he's by far the best science fiction author out there - in my mind, up there with Asimov, Clark, and Heinlein. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|