Lindsay Lohan poses nude as Marilyn Monroe

rowech · 02-18-2008, 11:04 AM

Not safe for work...

Go to NYMag's page.

rowech · 02-18-2008, 11:12 AM

Slide show is there for viewing as well.

MikeVic · 02-18-2008, 11:17 AM

It's really slow and is taking forever to load even the main page...

Also, if there are nudies, you might want to get rid of the link. I think that's not allowed.

MikeVic · 02-18-2008, 11:21 AM

She has a lot of freckles.

rkmsuf · 02-18-2008, 11:23 AM

Big ups for using the hxxp and still including the direct link.

rowech · 02-18-2008, 11:24 AM

Not sure what the rules are, I dumped the link in case. Just go to New York Mag's page if interested and there's a slideshow. It does take forever as I'm sure it's being visited quite a bit. She has thousands of freckles. More than any woman I've ever seen.

Anthony · 02-18-2008, 11:28 AM

do you see anything good or is she conveniently covering any items of interest with a blanket or strategically placed hand?

Draft Dodger · 02-18-2008, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hell Atlantic

do you see anything good or is she conveniently covering any items of interest with a blanket or strategically placed hand?

you want him to masturbate for you too, lazy boy?

Joe · 02-18-2008, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hell Atlantic

do you see anything good or is she conveniently covering any items of interest with a blanket or strategically placed hand?

one shot you can see nipple, and in one other you get some action without blockage. the other shots have coverings.

Lonnie · 02-18-2008, 11:47 AM

Not that great...

MJ4H · 02-18-2008, 11:57 AM

I'm still waiting on the page to load. It's taking forever. Can someone say HARRRR for me?

st.cronin · 02-18-2008, 12:01 PM

I'm a Lohan fan, but she does not look good in these pics.

Joe · 02-18-2008, 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger

you want him to masturbate for you too, lazy boy?

been there, done that

rowech · 02-18-2008, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin

I'm a Lohan fan, but she does not look good in these pics.

She's lost a lot in the last 1-2 years in my opinion.

st.cronin · 02-18-2008, 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rowech

She's lost a lot in the last 1-2 years in my opinion.

I think she still looks good for the most part, just this particular shoot she looks strange. Its such an obvious disguise, and she doesn't look comfortable.

stevew · 02-18-2008, 12:33 PM

what the hell is wrong with the internets? No page should take this long to load up.

Schmidty · 02-18-2008, 12:37 PM

Big meh.

Really, really bad areola/nipples. That killed the rest for me.

Joe · 02-18-2008, 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew

what the hell is wrong with the internets? No page should take this long to load up.

its in other places. look for it on popcrunch

Izulde · 02-18-2008, 12:47 PM

I'll be checking this out later in the day.

Noop · 02-18-2008, 12:49 PM

She has some small as nipples. I perfer gumdrop nipples myself. I must admit I got alittle chub looking at her cooch which looks to be nice and neat.

Pumpy Tudors · 02-18-2008, 12:50 PM

NYMag's page took so long to load, I ended up rubbing one out to the sidebar ad before all the pictures could load. Ah, well, I'll try again in a couple of hours.

kurtism · 02-18-2008, 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pumpy Tudors

NYMag's page took so long to load, I ended up rubbing one out to the sidebar ad before all the pictures could load. Ah, well, I'll try again in a couple of hours.

Close the thread. We have a winner.

Buccaneer · 02-18-2008, 01:08 PM

Marilyn Monroe was who she was but I cannot think of an uglier celebrity to try to pose as. All these Monroe-wannabees and lookalikes the past several years have been horrible looking, very unattractive. Not really a fan of Lohan but even in her drugged out state, she would look better as she is.

Anthony · 02-18-2008, 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger

you want him to masturbate for you too, lazy boy?

just did it, viewed the pics on popcrunch per someone else's suggestion.

unless he's game for sloppy seconds...

cougarfreak · 02-18-2008, 01:34 PM

That looks like some nasty shit to me.

Crim · 02-18-2008, 03:55 PM

SteveMax58 · 02-18-2008, 05:11 PM

I never did see her as anything more than a nappy-looking barfly.

I now realize I owe many a nappy-looking barfly an apology.

Groundhog · 02-18-2008, 05:14 PM

I don't know if I can even be bothered searching for NYMag's website address to look at these.

Lorena · 02-18-2008, 05:26 PM

She's a beautiful woman, but not as a blond w/ short hair.

JeeberD · 02-18-2008, 05:32 PM

She's much better looking now than she was a year or two ago when she looked like skeletor.

Oh, and I dig freckles...

MJ4H · 02-18-2008, 05:34 PM

Lindsay Lohan circa Mean Girls was amazing. Now, sorta. Getting better maybe??

Oilers9911 · 02-18-2008, 05:35 PM

Lindsay Lohan is totally unimpressive.

Apathetic Lurker · 02-18-2008, 06:04 PM

but she has an impressive set of lungs

rowech · 02-18-2008, 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MattJones4Heisman

Lindsay Lohan circa Mean Girls was amazing. Now, sorta. Getting better maybe??

Agree on both counts.

korme · 02-18-2008, 06:45 PM

ID BEAT IT UP

saldana · 02-18-2008, 07:10 PM

naked or not, i still think she looked like a dirty crack addict....count me among the not impressed.

Galaril · 02-18-2008, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saldana

naked or not, i still think she looked like a dirty crack addict....count me among the not impressed.

+1

oliegirl · 02-18-2008, 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dodgerchick

She's a beautiful woman, but not as a blond w/ short hair.

Agreed, I think Lindsey looks best as "the girl next door", not a lot of makeup, natural reddish haircolor, etc... Also, part of the magic of the original photo shoot with Marilyn was that it was all candid, she just posed and he snapped...there was nothing planned about it. That quality is so clearly not there with the Lindsey shoot, it's all very staged and just looks like a cheap copy of the original. I'm not impressed at all.

MizzouRah · 02-18-2008, 08:12 PM

Not great, but not bad either.

Groundhog · 02-18-2008, 10:26 PM

Had the photos e-mailed to me three times.

Not good at all IMO. Horrible fake boobs, sun (or solarium) damaged skin... Overall, much worse than I expected.

JeeberD · 02-18-2008, 10:31 PM

Fake boobs? If anything, they're slightly saggy...

Young Drachma · 02-18-2008, 10:31 PM

Looked a lot better than I anticipated. But clearly her best days are behind her. Overexposure is a bitch, me thinks.

Rizon · 02-19-2008, 12:26 AM

The 2007 Dolphins were better than those pictures.

Schmidty · 02-19-2008, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JeeberD

Fake boobs? If anything, they're slightly saggy...

Yep, the boob doctor agrees with Jeebs.

Groundhog · 02-19-2008, 01:20 AM

It'll take more than sag to convince me they aren't fake. I've seen some horrible boob jobs in my day (of surfing for Internet porn).

Schmidty · 02-19-2008, 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Groundhog

It'll take more than sag to convince me they aren't fake. I've seen some horrible boob jobs in my day (of surfing for Internet porn).

Sorry man. They aren't fake. They're ugly. But they aren't fake.

The King of Breasts has spoken, and has never been wrong.

Schmidty · 02-19-2008, 01:31 AM

Dola.

After another quick glance, I must take my last post back. I will give them a 50% chance of being fake. The roundness doesn't look quite right.

ageofquarrel · 02-19-2008, 02:28 AM

should have done this when she was 17 still would though

Vinatieri for Prez · 02-19-2008, 02:49 AM

I think this pic ends the debate of whether the boobies are fake. They're not.

hxxp://usversusthem.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/lindsay-lohan-boobs.jpg

Actually, this pic is better than any that showed up in the Monroe pictorial.

Warning, it's a very revealing side shot so be careful when viewing, if at work, etc.

Groundhog · 02-19-2008, 03:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vinatieri for Prez

I think this pic ends the debate of whether the boobies are fake. They're not.

hxxp://usversusthem.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/lindsay-lohan-boobs.jpg

Actually, this pic is better than any that showed up in the Monroe pictorial.

Warning, it's a very revealing side shot so be careful when viewing, if at work, etc.

Yup, that verifies two things; 1, they are real, and 2, they are horrible.

02-18-2008, 11:23 AM	#5
rkmsuf Head Coach Join Date: Dec 2001	Big ups for using the hxxp and still including the direct link. __________________ "Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales

02-18-2008, 11:24 AM	#6
rowech Pro Starter Join Date: Feb 2006	Not sure what the rules are, I dumped the link in case. Just go to New York Mag's page if interested and there's a slideshow. It does take forever as I'm sure it's being visited quite a bit. She has thousands of freckles. More than any woman I've ever seen. Last edited by rowech : 02-18-2008 at 11:24 AM.

02-18-2008, 11:47 AM	#10
Lonnie High School Varsity Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Midlothian, TX	Not that great... __________________ Lonnie

02-18-2008, 12:01 PM	#12
st.cronin General Manager Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: New Mexico	I'm a Lohan fan, but she does not look good in these pics. __________________ co-commish: bb-bbcf.net knives out

02-18-2008, 12:47 PM	#19
Izulde Head Coach Join Date: Sep 2004	I'll be checking this out later in the day. __________________ 2006 Golden Scribe Nominee 2006 Golden Scribe Winner Best Non-Sport Dynasty: May Our Reign Be Green and Golden (CK Dynasty) Rookie Writer of the Year Dynasty of the Year: May Our Reign Be Green and Golden (CK Dynasty)

02-18-2008, 11:12 AM	#2
rowech Pro Starter Join Date: Feb 2006	Slide show is there for viewing as well.

02-18-2008, 11:17 AM	#3
MikeVic Head Coach Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Hometown of Canada	It's really slow and is taking forever to load even the main page... Also, if there are nudies, you might want to get rid of the link. I think that's not allowed.

02-18-2008, 11:21 AM	#4
MikeVic Head Coach Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Hometown of Canada	She has a lot of freckles.

02-18-2008, 11:28 AM	#7
Anthony Banned Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Astoria, NY, USA	do you see anything good or is she conveniently covering any items of interest with a blanket or strategically placed hand?

02-18-2008, 11:57 AM	#11
MJ4H Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Hog Country	I'm still waiting on the page to load. It's taking forever. Can someone say HARRRR for me?

02-18-2008, 12:33 PM	#16
stevew Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: the yo'	what the hell is wrong with the internets? No page should take this long to load up.

02-18-2008, 12:37 PM	#17
Schmidty Coordinator Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Early, TX	Big meh. Really, really bad areola/nipples. That killed the rest for me.

02-18-2008, 12:49 PM	#20
Noop Bonafide Seminole Fan Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Florida	She has some small as nipples. I perfer gumdrop nipples myself. I must admit I got alittle chub looking at her cooch which looks to be nice and neat. __________________ Living in an Oligarchy.

02-18-2008, 12:50 PM	#21
Pumpy Tudors Bounty Hunter Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Pittsburgh, PA	NYMag's page took so long to load, I ended up rubbing one out to the sidebar ad before all the pictures could load. Ah, well, I'll try again in a couple of hours. __________________ No, I am not Batman, and I will not repair your food processor.

02-18-2008, 01:08 PM	#23
Buccaneer Head Coach Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Colorado	Marilyn Monroe was who she was but I cannot think of an uglier celebrity to try to pose as. All these Monroe-wannabees and lookalikes the past several years have been horrible looking, very unattractive. Not really a fan of Lohan but even in her drugged out state, she would look better as she is. Last edited by Buccaneer : 02-18-2008 at 01:08 PM.

02-18-2008, 01:34 PM	#25
cougarfreak College Starter Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Out of Grad School Hell :)	That looks like some nasty shit to me.

02-18-2008, 03:55 PM	#26
Crim College Benchwarmer Join Date: Dec 2003	Meh.

02-18-2008, 05:11 PM	#27
SteveMax58 College Starter Join Date: Dec 2006	I never did see her as anything more than a nappy-looking barfly. I now realize I owe many a nappy-looking barfly an apology. Last edited by SteveMax58 : 02-18-2008 at 05:11 PM.

02-18-2008, 05:14 PM	#28
Groundhog Coordinator Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Sydney, Australia	I don't know if I can even be bothered searching for NYMag's website address to look at these. __________________ Politics, n. Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. --Ambrose Bierce

02-18-2008, 05:26 PM	#29
Lorena Unregistered Join Date: May 2004	She's a beautiful woman, but not as a blond w/ short hair.

02-18-2008, 05:32 PM	#30
JeeberD General Manager Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: The Town of Flower Mound	She's much better looking now than she was a year or two ago when she looked like skeletor. Oh, and I dig freckles... __________________ UTEP Miners!!! I solemnly swear to never cheer for TO

02-18-2008, 05:34 PM	#31
MJ4H Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Hog Country	Lindsay Lohan circa Mean Girls was amazing. Now, sorta. Getting better maybe??

02-18-2008, 05:35 PM	#32
Oilers9911 College Benchwarmer Join Date: Jan 2006	Lindsay Lohan is totally unimpressive.

02-18-2008, 06:04 PM	#33
Apathetic Lurker College Prospect Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Buffalo,NY	but she has an impressive set of lungs

02-18-2008, 06:45 PM	#35
korme Go Reds Join Date: May 2001 Location: Bloodbuzz Ohio	ID BEAT IT UP

02-18-2008, 07:10 PM	#36
saldana Pro Starter Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Bethlehem, Pa	naked or not, i still think she looked like a dirty crack addict....count me among the not impressed.

02-18-2008, 08:12 PM	#39
MizzouRah Hall Of Famer Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Troy, Mo	Not great, but not bad either.

02-18-2008, 10:26 PM	#40
Groundhog Coordinator Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Sydney, Australia	Had the photos e-mailed to me three times. Not good at all IMO. Horrible fake boobs, sun (or solarium) damaged skin... Overall, much worse than I expected. __________________ Politics, n. Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. --Ambrose Bierce

02-18-2008, 10:31 PM	#41
JeeberD General Manager Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: The Town of Flower Mound	Fake boobs? If anything, they're slightly saggy... __________________ UTEP Miners!!! I solemnly swear to never cheer for TO

02-18-2008, 10:31 PM	#42
Young Drachma Dark Cloud Join Date: Apr 2001	Looked a lot better than I anticipated. But clearly her best days are behind her. Overexposure is a bitch, me thinks.

02-19-2008, 01:20 AM	#45
Groundhog Coordinator Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Sydney, Australia	It'll take more than sag to convince me they aren't fake. I've seen some horrible boob jobs in my day (of surfing for Internet porn). __________________ Politics, n. Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. --Ambrose Bierce

02-19-2008, 01:31 AM	#47
Schmidty Coordinator Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Early, TX	Dola. After another quick glance, I must take my last post back. I will give them a 50% chance of being fake. The roundness doesn't look quite right.

02-19-2008, 02:28 AM	#48
ageofquarrel H.S. Freshman Team Join Date: Feb 2004	should have done this when she was 17 still would though

02-19-2008, 02:49 AM	#49
Vinatieri for Prez College Starter Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Seattle	I think this pic ends the debate of whether the boobies are fake. They're not. hxxp://usversusthem.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/lindsay-lohan-boobs.jpg Actually, this pic is better than any that showed up in the Monroe pictorial. Warning, it's a very revealing side shot so be careful when viewing, if at work, etc. Last edited by Vinatieri for Prez : 02-19-2008 at 02:51 AM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)