![]() |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southern Maryland - For Now!
|
Position Changes
Curious as to what is the actual benefit of changing a players position versus just playing them out of position for a game or two? A couple of leagues I am in seem to have a number of owners that will change players positions frequently based upon injuries or need.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cary, NC, USA
|
Unknown. The general consensus (I think) is if that change is going to be a permanent one, it's better to take the immediate hit of ratings and start building up experience at the new position. If it's a one-game thing, then just play them out of position.
That said, the one obvious benefit is meeting position requirements (which is often done in FB/TE swaps). |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
n00b
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: London, UK
|
Sometimes players coming out of the draft are not at their most experienced positions. It's rare, but I find it not all that uncommon especially around the TE/FB positions to get an experience jump by changing.
My current gripe is a NT I drafted with the intention of changing him to DT to eventually replace one of my two stud DTs. After three years of not having the option of changing to DT I traded him in a fit of pique (for a stud CB). He promptly changed to LDT and had a breakout year. I am still fuming. ![]()
__________________
"...and Adrian Peterson is loose!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
|
Did you do weight training on him to get his weight correct?
__________________
-- Greg -- Author of various FOF utilities |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|