 |
11-05-2008, 10:44 PM
|
#1 | ||
|
n00b
Join Date: Apr 2008
|
WR switching
Should your best receiver be your FL? or does it matter? I have 2 SE's one moves to FL and stays at 55 overall. The other drops from 78 to 65 but is still a better player overall. My question is should I keep my best receiver at SE or move him to FL and not be as good?
|
||
|
|
|
11-05-2008, 11:55 PM
|
#2 |
|
n00b
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
I think that you just need to have your best receiver on the field. Do this by changing formation personnel. In my experience, there is no difference to SE and FL and changing their position can only hurt the player.
|
|
|
|
|
11-06-2008, 12:31 AM
|
#3 |
|
n00b
Join Date: Apr 2008
|
I was thinking the same, it just seems that my best receiver is always my FL.
|
|
|
|
|
11-06-2008, 05:01 AM
|
#4 |
|
n00b
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
|
I have the impression that "Rex" wants to put the best WR at FL, even if his position is listed as SE.
So far I did not have bad experience position switching WR's, but I usually play the guy out of position (SE at FL) until he has red experience level in both his listed position and the other one before I make a switch. Don't know if that's smart, but it worked for me. |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
