![]() |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
n00b
Join Date: Apr 2008
|
3-4
Im sure this has been asked before, but I am to lazy to look for it. Where do you want your better ILB in the 3-4? or does it make a diffrence? Just based on player ratings and not scheme ability. 1 ILB is a 60's and the other is low 50's.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
The SILB plays in a lot more packages. And I believe he should be a much more well rounded player. I think the main trait of a WILB should be run defense, at least that's how I play it anyways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Woodstock, GA
|
The WILB is the first one to come out. In the Nickle, he is replaced with a DB.
I tend to put my best LB at either SILB or WLB in 3-4.
__________________
Championships Won CCFL 2040 PFL 2015 2022 2026 2046 FFL 2013 2014 2015 RNFL 2014 2029 GMFL 2009 HFL 1983 1987 1990 TFL 1983 vNFL 2024 GML 2011 WOOF 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
|
Hmm....probably just conjecture here (or perhaps even football knowledge > FOF knowledge), but I usually put my best LB (or at least my best coverage LB) at SLB b/c that's who normally covers the tight end.
Also, I usually like a high rush/pass tech guy at the SILB/WILB position because he "plugs the hole" so to speak. Pass rusher only at WLB (although I doubt high run tech hurts) At least in previous versions, I think the WLB in a 3-4 basically acted/put up stats as an RDE would in the 4-3 (and RDE = RDT stats). YMMV, though. Last edited by RedKingGold : 02-13-2010 at 09:26 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
n00b
Join Date: Apr 2008
|
thanks guys, forgot about the WILB pull on nickel. that answers my question.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|