 |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who do you take | |||
| Mario Manningham |
  
|
22 | 70.97% |
| Mike Williams |
  
|
9 | 29.03% |
| Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
04-28-2011, 05:04 PM
|
#1 | ||
|
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
NFL WR opinion-help solve an argument
A Seahawks friend of mine and I are arguing and I need the help of FOFC to solve the argument.
Right now who do you take on your team, Mario Manningham or Mike Williams? |
||
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 05:11 PM
|
#2 |
|
Retired
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fantasyland
|
Depends on the scheme and the need. If I want a guy for the slot who has a bit of speed, I'm going for Mario Manningham. If I need a bigger guy on the outside, I'm taking Mike Williams.
If I had to take one, I'll take the younger, faster guy with 9tds over the older, bigger guy who had 2. Especially since MM doesn't have the baggage of Mike Williams (though both guys have baggage galore). Of course, what spurred this argument? And I'd much rather have Mike Wallace over either. Last edited by Blackadar : 04-28-2011 at 05:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 05:13 PM
|
#3 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: In the thick of it.
|
Any FOFC Poll that doesn't have a trout option is bunk.
__________________
I'm still here. Don't touch my fucking bacon. |
|
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 05:13 PM
|
#4 |
|
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
I don't even really remember how it started. I think we were talking about the draft and such and it just kind of went from there.
I realize we aren't talking a clash of titans here or anything.  |
|
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 05:21 PM
|
#5 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minnesota
|
Id take Manningham and its not because of production.
Id be worried if I gave Williams a big paycheck hed get back into his bad habits that almost cost him a NFL career. I sort of like Manningham as a playmaker. |
|
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 06:17 PM
|
#6 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
|
Do I have to pick one?
|
|
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 06:24 PM
|
#7 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wisconsin
|
Mario.
I'm not convinced Mike Williams is out of the woods. He came back from just nothing and I'd be worried he would go right back to nothing just as quickly.
__________________
You, you will regret what you have done this day. I will make you regret ever being born. Your going to wish you never left your mothers womb, where it was warm and safe... and wet. i am going to show you pain you never knew existed, you are going to see a whole new spectrum of pain, like a Rainboooow. But! This rainbow is not just like any other rainbow, its... |
|
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 06:30 PM
|
#8 |
|
Bounty Hunter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
So will your friend accept FOFC's answer?
__________________
No, I am not Batman, and I will not repair your food processor. |
|
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 06:52 PM
|
#9 | |
|
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Quote:
no, he's stubborn |
|
|
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 07:01 PM
|
#10 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Fresno, CA
|
Manningham has less upside, but also less baggage.
|
|
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 10:59 PM
|
#11 |
|
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: A sports era long ago when everything didnt require a Nike logo
|
BMW is the correct answer but its also what youre fishing for.
__________________
I think that Rosen will be the best QB in the class. -albionmoonlight |
|
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 11:01 PM
|
#12 | |
|
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Quote:
huh? |
|
|
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 11:04 PM
|
#13 |
|
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: A sports era long ago when everything didnt require a Nike logo
|
BIG
MIKE WILLIAMS = BMW srsly?
__________________
I think that Rosen will be the best QB in the class. -albionmoonlight |
|
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 11:06 PM
|
#14 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
This thread is really dumb. I mean, a debate over who is the 43rd best receiver in the NFL? Really?
|
|
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 11:09 PM
|
#15 | |
|
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Quote:
I was pretty transparent that it was to solve an argument. You always have the option to not click on it. |
|
|
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 11:16 PM
|
#16 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
Who better? Stevie Johnson or Nate Burleson?
|
|
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 11:20 PM
|
#17 |
|
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Feel free to start that thread and I can choose to vote, not vote, or make douchebag comments in the thread.
|
|
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 11:22 PM
|
#18 | |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
Quote:
It does. Read: "Mike Williams" (more of a carp, really...) |
|
|
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 11:47 PM
|
#19 |
|
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sterling Heights, Mi
|
Fantasy wise, its Manningham and its not close.
If you are going with more skilled receiver, its a little harder because they are completely different receivers. All things being equal, I would go with Manningham because of the skeletons in Williams' closet. |
|
|
|
|
04-29-2011, 08:40 AM
|
#20 |
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
|
Which Mike Williams?
__________________
-- Greg -- Author of various FOF utilities |
|
|
|
|
04-29-2011, 06:43 PM
|
#21 | |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
|
Quote:
When I read the 1st post I assumed the one in Tampa since that would be an actual discussion. If it's the fat one from USC then I don't even know why there would be any debate. I'd take TB Mike Williams over Manningham. I'd take Tom Waddle right now over fat Mike Williams. |
|
|
|
|
|
04-29-2011, 09:43 PM
|
#22 |
|
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
It is the USC Mike WIlliams
|
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
