![]() |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Mascot
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London
|
Rather Odd MVPs
I have recently started playing again and have noticed that the MVP award seems to be going to some very strange players. Take the following game which, it is well worth noting, was won by Tennessee:
http://i373.photobucket.com/albums/o...K/WeirdMVP.jpg How on earth did a decent (but hardly record-breaking) performance by the losing QB get the MVP award, especially ahead of a 170 yard/2 TD receiving performance on the winning side? Heck, I thought convention was to always give the MVP to the winning side as a matter of course. This is far from the only strange choice even though I have only played 20 or so games so far. I don't remember the choices being this odd when I used to play, has something changed? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Maassluis, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
|
Sure, I do agree that a receiver with 170yd and 2 td deserves it more, but there's nothing odd about a QB throwing for 300yd, 2 td, 0 int to get the MVP honors, especially if he's more popular.
__________________
* 2005 Golden Scribe winner for best FOF Dynasty about IHOF's Maassluis Merchantmen * Former GM of GEFL's Houston Oilers and WOOF's Curacao Cocktail |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Mascot
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London
|
Fan Popularity has an impact on MVP voting then? Interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Maassluis, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
|
Quote:
What's more important here is that FOF loves performing QBs quite a lot.
__________________
* 2005 Golden Scribe winner for best FOF Dynasty about IHOF's Maassluis Merchantmen * Former GM of GEFL's Houston Oilers and WOOF's Curacao Cocktail |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|