Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Main Forums > FOF9, FOF8, and TCY Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-07-2013, 05:04 PM   #1
bbriders
n00b
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
DE ? to WLB? Thoughts?

I have a defensive end in a MP league and was wanting some thoughts from more experienced players. He is short at 5'11" and 266 lbs. He is just entering his 5th season. He is rated at an overall of 70 with good bars all the way across. 74 PR Tech. and 78 PR Strength. With the other bars all just under those numbers. He has been creaping since drafted.

I just haven't had the production out of him that I was expecting from a player of this caliber. Is it because he is short? I run a 4-3 but have thought about switching to a 3-4 and moving him to WLB (He would have to lose some weight). His production last year was 6.5 sacks with 19 hurries and the year before 8.5 sacks with 9 hurries. His PR Pct over the last 4 seasons is 5.7. Again I thought he would have more production.

At WLB he looks like he should be 64 PR Tech, and 78 PR Strength. So the big question I am debating is to leave him at DE and stick with the 4-3 or move him to WLB and move to the 3-4 or just trade him? Where would he be of most use? Thoughts? What would y'all do?

bbriders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2013, 11:19 PM   #2
scorp
Mascot
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
PRT is really the more important bar for a WLB although those numbers look good for a WLB.
__________________
Thank you Nawlins fan and Shanethemaster for the helmet/logo work for the Richmond Rhinos of the WOOF.
scorp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2013, 08:58 AM   #3
lastcat3
n00b
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Most people on here have often said that the height and weight matters little and it is the bars that count. Though I'm not sure anyone truly knows for certain.

In anycase how good are your surrounding players on defense? If your other players aren't up to the same caliber it is much easier for opponents to stop him.
lastcat3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2013, 09:20 AM   #4
Julio Riddols
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bryson Shitty, NC
I'd be wary of moving him. My thought is that you would likely get more out of him as a DE, but probably do even better to try and get something good for him in a trade, then use that on a WLB or a DE with better size.
__________________
Recklessly enthused, stubbornly amused.

FUCK EA
Julio Riddols is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2013, 09:23 AM   #5
Julio Riddols
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bryson Shitty, NC
Successful moves I have seen:

FB->RB
WLB->DE
CB->S
DT->DE
DE->DT
RB->WR
S->SLB
T->C
G->C
C->G
G->T
__________________
Recklessly enthused, stubbornly amused.

FUCK EA
Julio Riddols is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2013, 09:28 AM   #6
lastcat3
n00b
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
seven to nine sacks a season isn't really that bad and will be on par with most of the good D-linemen in the league . I seldom pay attention to the hurries stat line so don't know what is considered good in that regard.
lastcat3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2013, 10:38 AM   #7
Southpaw330
n00b
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
I regularly move DEs to LB - both inside and outside - and proper weight is the most important factor but bars also play a role. I wouldn't do it after a player's rookie season and I wouldn't do it with a player who has a high PRT bar without a high RD bar. I'm not sure what stage of the season you're currently in but if you're moving him to OLB, try and get his weight down before making the move. That said, given that he's in his fifth year, I really wouldn't try it.
Southpaw330 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2013, 11:50 AM   #8
bbriders
n00b
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
The surrounding D-Front is okay. The DTs are good to very good with the other DE being just avg. The LBs are all just above avg and the low end of good.
We are at the beginning of FA 1. The draft doesn't have anybody that I feel could replace him. If I was going to move him I would just have him lose some weight in TC and then move him.

So no one has really determined that a Short player doesn't have the production as the avg. player given the same abilities?
I guess 7-9 sacks is on par. I was just hopping for a little more. Guess I really should upgrade my other DE.

Thanks for the input guys.
bbriders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2013, 05:45 PM   #9
tej2101
n00b
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
I've tried for years to get an "LT" this way and I'm always disappointed. I'd keep him at DE. The only positions that I can consistently change with good results seem to be corner and safety.

For that WLB pass rusher in a 3-4, I've been very successful moving MLB/ILBs to the outside though.
tej2101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2013, 07:53 PM   #10
cuervo72
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland
Quote:
Originally Posted by lastcat3 View Post
seven to nine sacks a season isn't really that bad and will be on par with most of the good D-linemen in the league . I seldom pay attention to the hurries stat line so don't know what is considered good in that regard.

I'd say these days, anything 30+ is really good (from a DE - WLB can put up absolutely silly numbers, of course).

I actually really like studly DE; have a couple in FOFL (we're an odd team that still runs a 4-3), and have lead the league in PA the last couple of seasons (250 and 220, of course that 220 was tied with the aforementioned silly LB's team)
__________________
null
cuervo72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.