![]() |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minnesota
|
Re-negotiate Issue
I understand X-factor has a lot to do with this and how the computer sees these players however this seems a bit extreme. He would actually accept this and cost himself a lot of money.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minnesota
|
Sorry didnt realize that screenshot would end up being so large.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
|
eh, he still keeps his 11m this season, and if the salarys are that out whack he'd never see the future money anyway
looks like other versions of fof to me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minnesota
|
Quote:
Yeah, maybe it isnt so bad. Just looks strange. He is asking for around 45 million over 5 years in which 19 million is a sure thing. If the contract stayed as is he would get around 75m with only 7.2 guaranteed. But if he played season 1 out which you would assume the team would keep him. There would be no advantage in him accepting the new deal as he would have already made/be promised what he is assured of with the new contract demand. Not really saying it is right or wrong just looking for thoughts on this. Last edited by jbergey22 : 12-14-2013 at 12:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Diego
|
Yeah, I think the structure of some real contracts in the default rosters creates some seemingly quirky AI behavior. It probably doesn't impact too much in the end.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|