The Weight Training - What is more important?

[Templar]

The Weight Training - What is more important?

I'm uncertain here.
What is more important?

A. An average weight for his Position.
or
B. An average mass/body ratio compared to others at the position.

[jzicc]

I focus on B first (fwiw)

[Templar]

Originally Posted by Templar

The Weight Training - What is more important?

I'm uncertain here.
What is more important?

A. An average weight for his Position.
or
B. An average mass/body ratio compared to others at the position.

So many analyzes to FOF, but still no valid response to this...

[Ben E Lou]

Originally Posted by Templar

So many analyzes to FOF, but still no valid response to this...

Perhaps because you're picking at nits. Weight doesn't matter enough to be bothered with all that clicking. My impression is that most people don't fool with it at all unless position switching.

[Templar]

Originally Posted by Ben E Lou

Perhaps because you're picking at nits...

Yes, perhaps.

It's one of the few issues on which the FOF Communities has still not found an answer.

Perhaps that will also depend on the position?
For OL average weight is important?
For RB average mass/body ratio because an RB should be agile?

[Ben E Lou]

Originally Posted by Templar

It's one of the few issues on which the FOF Communities has still not found an answer.

No, it's not. I gave you the answer above.

Originally Posted by Ben E Lou

Weight doesn't matter enough to be bothered with all that clicking.

[Lasse]

So are weight irrelevant for players? Or only in the extreme cases?

[MalcPow]

It definitely has an impact on conversions. Everything else that I've seen over the years has led me to pretty comfortably believe that ratings and ability play such an incredibly more significant role in performance that weight is essentially irrelevant from a player evaluation standpoint. Ben has seen the same and is trying to save you some clicks.

[QuikSand]

I, too, totally ignore weight unless I am eyeing a position switch.

[QuikSand]

...so now we can get to the bottom of agent loyalty!