FBCB: Ratings Scales

[RPI-Fan]

Which rating scale do you use, and why?

I've always used to the A-F scale, if nothing else because I liked the way it worked out in FBB. But I think it's time for a change, as I'm starting a new career soon.. what do you all recommend?

I'm currently leaning 1-20, for that CM feel, but I'm curious as to the experiences others have had.

~rpi-fan

[The_herd]

I use the 1-100 scale. Just seems natural to me for some reason. I always get more of a feel for my players using that as opposed to the A-F or 1-10 scale.

If I had to choose another though, it would definately be the 1-20 ratings.

[Groundhog]

I like 1-10. It leaves some guess work in, as if you have two guys with similiar ratings, you really have to watch their performance to judge the better player.

[Balldog]

I am using 1-20 now, I was using 1-100. I think I like 1-20 better though.

[sabotai]

I use the 1-20 scale. Gives me enough info on the player, but not too accurate.

[hollmt]

I like 1-10. It leaves some guess work in, as if you have two guys with similiar ratings, you really have to watch their performance to judge the better player.

i use the 1-100 but i kinda like your idea here. leaves a bit of guess work to find the better player if 2 are fairly equal at a position.

[Neuqua]

I use the 1-20 scale. Gives me enough info on the player, but not too accurate.
what he said.

[Godzilla Blitz]

I've only played one game, and I'm using 1-100. Not sure why I picked it. So far I'm satisfied, but I think 1-20 or 1-10 might be easier for me to quickly assess players visually, so I might go with that next time.