PDA

View Full Version : FOFC Allocation Draft - I'd never really tried something like this.


Axxon
03-18-2004, 05:59 PM
I was wondering about how the salaries were initially assigned to players that are drafted. I knew that there was some kind of slotting system but I decided to see what kind of variety was included and if it took the player picked into account.

I had the 8th pick in the draft. After much deliberation I took rookie punter Desmond Parker. He is ranked as a 0/0 and the only skill he has that isn't at 0 is kick holding and he is considered 100% developed. Every team needs a kick holder so I grabbed him.

His agent, Shawn Finch, who is a very stubborn negotiator ( 94 ) managed to ink a 6 yr $77.1 million dollar deal.
He gets 8.4m this season alone and his SB is 21.6 million. I guess the player taken doesn't play into it much.

It's kinda funny because a couple of weeks ago I'd tried to run an empty cupboard but the trouble was, if I tried to release everybody in yr one I couldn't field a team literally in season 2 due to dead cap space. I tried more than once. There is no expansion team to play so I can't start that way and I thought, hey if I allocaton draft only scrubs maybe I can cut them all and still field a team. That's why I tried this experiment and apparantly it won't work either.

I know some people are running empty cupboards but I can't see how? Maybe I've just been real unlucky??

Started over same game and with the 8th pick took K Kevin Sanderson. He's a 7/11 but represented by Melvin Gomez, an 8 negotiator. I got a similar but slightly smaller deal. 5 yr roughly 57.5 mil deal.

Started yet again and took 7 yr vet RCB Richard McNew. He's also represented by Melvin Gomez ( 8). He's the highest ranked corner at 85/85. Identical deal that Gomez got Sanderson.

It's a small test but it looks like the player's skills may well have zero influence on the initial contract. It's all the slot and the agent.

Axxon
03-18-2004, 06:13 PM
Dola, I've run some more quick drafts and at least the number of years you're stuck with varies a bit. For example, the 5th rounder usually gets a 1 yr deal but I've seen one 4 year deal and a 3 year one as opposed to 6 1yr deals. There seems to be some tendencies and I'm sure the agents may have a lot to do with it but I'm on my way to work soon so I'm not being very scientific.

It is interesting though.

Axxon
03-18-2004, 06:32 PM
Trola,

I just tried one last quick test. I had been using one HR generated roster for the above obviously. I loaded a new game with the stock roster. This time I picked 4th and it was pretty much what I'd been seeing before.

The first rounder got the same 8.4 in y one and a 5 yr deal. The 5th rounder got the same 3.95 one year deal. I think if I had the time, putting together a "what to expect" draft cheat sheet would be doable.

I'm really interested in the 5th rounder because I hate my younger star players starting off on small deals but if I saw an older vet that had one or two years in him, I'd sign him with this pick.

Axxon
03-18-2004, 08:35 PM
Just another observation. I'm trying to be a bit more scientific between work. I ran 5 computer controlled drafts with the same draft file. I was looking for tendencies.

The first thing that stands out in the first file I have looked at is that every single player per round is making the same first year money. The difference seems to only be in the years. This pretty much sucks as I've often tried to find mid round "bargains" to keep some cap money but it doesn't matter. Takes some of the fun out of the drafting to me.

Now, about contract lengths. I've just started looking at this but I'm thinking I don't need to. I'm betting due to what I did above that the agent controls contract length, thus the overall value.

I guess I did a lot of work for nothing but I never knew this and I'm glad I did dig a little deeper.

Axxon
03-18-2004, 08:52 PM
Well, the agents can't be it because just by looking at the first pick of all five drafts, LT Wilford Friedrich has the same agent f course but contracts that end in 04,05,07,08, 08. I'm not sure if the agent has any effect at all now.

Hmm.

Oh, I guess 92/92 7 yr tackles are pretty sought after, at least by the Chiefs. :D

fantastic flying froggies
03-19-2004, 03:43 AM
Just so you know : you're not alone in this world !

Axxon
03-19-2004, 05:43 AM
I was beginning to wonder. :)