View Full Version : Lebron or Wade?
MrBug708
05-23-2005, 10:29 PM
Go back to 2003 draft. Do you take Lebron or Wade?
Swaggs
05-23-2005, 10:30 PM
Lebron.
Schmidty
05-23-2005, 10:33 PM
Darko.
GreenMonster
05-23-2005, 10:37 PM
I think Wade has a chance to be a great player but LeBron has a chance to be special.. Lebron is 20 and played 2 years out of high school and Wade 5 now. Lebron does it all and I think his ceiling is a little higher than Wade's..
Danny
05-23-2005, 10:39 PM
While everone and their mother wanted to bone Wade these past couple weeks, I will take Lebron.
DaddyTorgo
05-23-2005, 10:45 PM
lebron...no doubt. not even a second of hesitation. i think we need to wait 15 years or so though before we can really do this discussion justice of course. to see the impact both guys have
duckman
05-23-2005, 11:00 PM
Sam Bowie
Deattribution
05-23-2005, 11:05 PM
This would be a better question if it were Carmelo or Wade.
Lebron slightly, just because I think he elevated his team alot but got caught in a big mess with the team changing owners,coaches,losing control of players, and losing players all together (Boozer).
EagleFan
05-23-2005, 11:07 PM
Darko.
lol
Eaglesfan27
05-23-2005, 11:10 PM
This would be a better question if it were Carmelo or Wade.
Lebron slightly, just because I think he elevated his team alot but got caught in a big mess with the team changing owners,coaches,losing control of players, and losing players all together (Boozer).
I think Wade wins that discussion of Wade vs Carmelo. However, I'd take Lebron over Wade.
st.cronin
05-23-2005, 11:15 PM
1. Lebron
2. Wade
3. Anthony
GreenMonster
05-23-2005, 11:22 PM
1. Lebron
2. Wade
3. Anthony
I think most would agree with this order..
Young Drachma
05-23-2005, 11:25 PM
Go back to 2003 draft. Do you take Lebron or Wade?
Lebron.
Sharpieman
05-23-2005, 11:26 PM
The reason you are even mentioning Wade is because he's got Shaq at his side.
Danny
05-23-2005, 11:28 PM
Just last week all the hype was, oh my Wade is more valuable than Shaq, Shaq needs Wade more than the other way around, Wade is the best player under 6'10 in the NBA, wade is the next Jordan. Get real. Wade led his team to a few great games over a mediocre team in disarray. I really like Wade too, and think is one of the better players in the league, but the hype form one week of games was just ridiculous heh :)
Young Drachma
05-23-2005, 11:28 PM
Exactly. With all his baggage, I'd take Kobe over Wade, if you gave me Shaq with either of them.
Imagine LEBRON with Shaq on his team?!?!
Deattribution
05-23-2005, 11:36 PM
I'd take Wade over Kobe any day of the week, Wade still has alot of room to grow, especially once he downs his defense and gets his 3pter going and he's already on par with Kobe.
Kobe has all the baggage and bad rep around him, plus he's about as good as he's gonna get, sure he has 3 rings, and I won't even go into the Kobe has Shaq debate, the only thing I will say is how many rings are those 3 rings going to win me today?
None.
Eaglesfan27
05-23-2005, 11:43 PM
I'd take Wade over Kobe any day of the week, Wade still has alot of room to grow, especially once he downs his defense and gets his 3pter going and he's already on par with Kobe.
Kobe has all the baggage and bad rep around him, plus he's about as good as he's gonna get, sure he has 3 rings, and I won't even go into the Kobe has Shaq debate, the only thing I will say is how many rings are those 3 rings going to win me today?
None.
I agree. You have to look at intangibles. Kobe alienates his teammates and does not make them better. Wade makes his teammates better and has done it all year, including games where he did not have Shaq.
MrBug708
05-23-2005, 11:47 PM
Has anyone ever questioned the fact that Shaq has always had all star guards? Or does he make them that way?
Danny
05-23-2005, 11:59 PM
I agree. You have to look at intangibles. Kobe alienates his teammates and does not make them better. Wade makes his teammates better and has done it all year, including games where he did not have Shaq.
More drivel. Kobe and Shaq won 3 rings together. There were many times where Shaq was hurt or struggling and Kobe carried the team on his back. Kobe was the guy who won them the games in the 4th quarter when Shaq was being hacked. Kobe was an awesome, awesome player. I watched every Lakers playoff game from the year Kobe got there to now. He did make his teamates better, and he did carry the team when needed and he did lead the team in the 4th quarter when it mattered.
Just because he turned into a major jackass now doesn't mean what he did in the past should be thought any less of. The Kobe you are describing is the one of right now, not the Kobe who teamed with Shaq to win 3 straight championships. People change, not always for the better.
Pacersfan46
05-24-2005, 12:19 AM
The reason you are even mentioning Wade is because he's got Shaq at his side.
Not true AT ALL.
People were talking about him last year in the playoffs when he didn't have Shaq, and almost single handedly upset the Pacers as the #8 seed playing the team with the best record in the NBA, and he did it without Shaq.
Danny
05-24-2005, 12:28 AM
Hah, I reread my post about Wade a little above, and wow there were a lot of typing errors. Anyway, I like Wade a lot and if I had to pick between him and Kobe moving forward, I would pick Wade. But, Wade still has a lot to prove and he would be lucky to have a career as successful as the one Kobe has had up to this point.
Eaglesfan27
05-24-2005, 01:06 AM
More drivel. Kobe and Shaq won 3 rings together. There were many times where Shaq was hurt or struggling and Kobe carried the team on his back. Kobe was the guy who won them the games in the 4th quarter when Shaq was being hacked. Kobe was an awesome, awesome player. I watched every Lakers playoff game from the year Kobe got there to now. He did make his teamates better, and he did carry the team when needed and he did lead the team in the 4th quarter when it mattered.
Just because he turned into a major jackass now doesn't mean what he did in the past should be thought any less of. The Kobe you are describing is the one of right now, not the Kobe who teamed with Shaq to win 3 straight championships. People change, not always for the better.
It is not drivel. Kobe inherited two of Wade's most important role players from last year. Wade made those guys and the rest of his team into a 2nd round playoff team last year before Shaq arrived. Wade made his teammates better. Kobe made the Lakers a lottery team. Yeah, yeah, I know the West is tougher than the East, but Kobe is showing his inability to make his teammates better. Kobe is lucky he had Shaq. The only reason Kobe did well in the past is because Phil and Shaq could help ease Kobe's lack of intangibles. Of course, this is all opinion, but there certainly is circumstantial evidence that indicates this. The real test will be what Kobe does the next few years.
korme
05-24-2005, 01:15 AM
All I'm saying is Wade is 23, Bryant only 26. Just because Kobe isn't in the spotlight right now doesn't mean he doesn't have many great years ahead of him.
Eaglesfan27
05-24-2005, 01:20 AM
All I'm saying is Wade is 23, Bryant only 26. Just because Kobe isn't in the spotlight right now doesn't mean he doesn't have many great years ahead of him.
Maybe I'll eat my words, but I'll predict that Kobe never wins another title unless he brings Phil back. Phil could actually ease over his weaknesses in dealing with others and help him win titles. I don't think anyone else has a strong enough personality to deal with Kobe's.
Young Drachma
05-24-2005, 01:41 AM
Maybe I'll eat my words, but I'll predict that Kobe never wins another title unless he brings Phil back. Phil could actually ease over his weaknesses in dealing with others and help him win titles. I don't think anyone else has a strong enough personality to deal with Kobe's.
Kobe will overcome this. He'll grow. Jordan wasn't this successful at his age.
JeeberD
05-24-2005, 01:56 AM
Lebron. Easy question...
Has anyone ever questioned the fact that Shaq has always had all star guards? Or does he make them that way?
Penny :rolleyes:
Neon_Chaos
05-24-2005, 02:19 AM
Lebron most definitely. He's a rare breed... height, athleticism, court-savvy, basketball IQ off the charts. Insane.
To put it into perspective, would you rather have in your team:
Shaq and Lebron, or Shaq and Wade?
Sharpieman
05-24-2005, 02:23 AM
Not true AT ALL.
People were talking about him last year in the playoffs when he didn't have Shaq, and almost single handedly upset the Pacers as the #8 seed playing the team with the best record in the NBA, and he did it without Shaq.
Oh please! If Shaq wasn't there the Heat would not be where they are right now. Wade is one of the better guards in the game, but put Shaq with any good guard in the league and that team will be one of the best teams in the league. You put Lebron with Shaq, oh my God, that team would be unstoppable. Once Shaq is gone, once he retires or whatever, the Heat aren't contenders for the title anymore.
Deattribution
05-24-2005, 02:55 AM
Oh please! If Shaq wasn't there the Heat would not be where they are right now.
They'd sure as hell be alot better than the Shaqless Lakers.
It's probably the most obvious observation here, but if you're a Laker fan, or a L.A altogether, you're going to be a tad bit biased towards Kobe.
Wade at the very least is on the same, or similiar level with Kobe.
Deattribution
05-24-2005, 02:58 AM
Dola
Until Kobe wins on his own, he will always be to Shaq what Pippen was to Jordan, a key player but replacable.
Raiders Army
05-24-2005, 06:23 AM
Neither, I don't take guys.
Raiders Army
05-24-2005, 06:24 AM
Dola, or let guys take me.
Warhammer
05-24-2005, 09:02 AM
Lebron. Easy question...
Penny :rolleyes:
Don't forget, Penny blew his knee out two years after Shaq left. IIRC Penny had a VERY good year the year Shaq left.
JeeberD
05-24-2005, 09:57 AM
Bah, give me the real Hardaway...
Danny
05-24-2005, 10:20 AM
It is not drivel. Kobe inherited two of Wade's most important role players from last year. Wade made those guys and the rest of his team into a 2nd round playoff team last year before Shaq arrived. Wade made his teammates better. Kobe made the Lakers a lottery team. Yeah, yeah, I know the West is tougher than the East, but Kobe is showing his inability to make his teammates better. Kobe is lucky he had Shaq. The only reason Kobe did well in the past is because Phil and Shaq could help ease Kobe's lack of intangibles. Of course, this is all opinion, but there certainly is circumstantial evidence that indicates this. The real test will be what Kobe does the next few years.
I will say this again. Shaq needed Kobe and Kobe needed Shaq. Without either one, there are 0 titles. Kobe was the best 4th quarter player in the NBA during those seasons. Without Kobe's late game and overtime ability, the Lakers wouldn't have won a single title.
Can you answer me this, did you watch all the playoff games from those seasons? And seriously, using this season's Lakers team and last season's Heat team is basically taking the worst from Kobe and ingoring everything else he has done.
Also, look at Coaching! Wade and the rest of the Heat had a great coach who is known for making the most out of teams last season in Pat Riley. The Lakers had Rudy T who is a good coach. They were learning a new system, then after 30 or so games, they get a new coach with an entirely new system to almost everyone as they go back to the Triangle. If you expect Odom, Bulter, and everyone else along with Kobe to learn and become efficient in the triangle in a mid season switch, then you are crazy. When that happened, I knew the Lakers were done.
Pacersfan46
05-24-2005, 11:24 AM
Once Shaq is gone, once he retires or whatever, the Heat aren't contenders for the title anymore.
Yeah, once Shaq is gone and replaced by nobody, they won't be title contenders. Yet, the Lakers lose Shaq, and get 2 good players, and they're not even playoff contenders. Do you honestly believe without Wade, the Heat are title contenders?
Regardless, the point still stands. You just don't want to admit it. People talked about him last year as he put up one hell of a fight against the Pacers with Artest guarding him. Shaq isn't the only reason people mention Dwayne Wade.
weinstein7
05-24-2005, 12:21 PM
Ok, so we all (or at least most of us) agree that it's
Lebron
Dwyane
'melo
What about the rest? I figure Bosh has to be 4 (although I have to admit I've never actually seen him play), then maybe Heinrich 5. Then you've still got contributors like Ridnour, Collison, and Josh Howard, not to mention all the projects.
Deattribution
05-24-2005, 12:38 PM
I will say this again. Shaq needed Kobe and Kobe needed Shaq. Without either one, there are 0 titles. Kobe was the best 4th quarter player in the NBA during those seasons. Without Kobe's late game and overtime ability, the Lakers wouldn't have won a single title.
Can you answer me this, did you watch all the playoff games from those seasons? And seriously, using this season's Lakers team and last season's Heat team is basically taking the worst from Kobe and ingoring everything else he has done.
Also, look at Coaching! Wade and the rest of the Heat had a great coach who is known for making the most out of teams last season in Pat Riley. The Lakers had Rudy T who is a good coach. They were learning a new system, then after 30 or so games, they get a new coach with an entirely new system to almost everyone as they go back to the Triangle. If you expect Odom, Bulter, and everyone else along with Kobe to learn and become efficient in the triangle in a mid season switch, then you are crazy. When that happened, I knew the Lakers were done.
Could you kiss the Laker's ass anymore? geesh.
if you want to talk about drivel, Pat Riley wasn't coaching the Heat when they reach the playoffs last year, the assistant, and now head coach Stan Van Gundy was. So not only was the team led by a rookie but by a rookie head coach too.
Put in any Good to great player with Shaq, with Phil Jackson coaching, and you have a 95%+ chance of winning in all three of those years still.
When Kobe takes the Laker's to the draft lottery championship again next year, get back to me.
Danny
05-24-2005, 02:29 PM
Could you kiss the Laker's ass anymore? geesh.
if you want to talk about drivel, Pat Riley wasn't coaching the Heat when they reach the playoffs last year, the assistant, and now head coach Stan Van Gundy was. So not only was the team led by a rookie but by a rookie head coach too.
Put in any Good to great player with Shaq, with Phil Jackson coaching, and you have a 95%+ chance of winning in all three of those years still.
When Kobe takes the Laker's to the draft lottery championship again next year, get back to me.
I am wrong about the Riley comment, so I apologize for that, but either way I am done here. I should have known better to actually argue for a three time consecutive champion player and team. It's painfully obvious people either didn't watch those playoff games, have simply forgotten or the most likely, are buying into the media hype. Whatever.
I don't even like Kobe, so why bother?
On to more important things, who is hotter, Natalie Portman or Keira Knightley?
st.cronin
05-24-2005, 05:28 PM
In a TPF or Strat or fantasy league I think Kobe over Wade is an easy choice. Kobe has more game. In real life, I'll take Wade, thank you very much.
Eaglesfan27
05-24-2005, 07:47 PM
One other factor in the Kobe vs Wade argument. Wade is playing with a hobbled Shaq who is not close to what he was during those 3 championship years. That will be important to remember in any final comparisions.
Oh yeah, Danny, I watched every Lakers Playoff game as I've always been a Shaq fan.
Danny
05-24-2005, 08:17 PM
Oh yeah, Danny, I watched every Lakers Playoff game as I've always been a Shaq fan.
Like I said, I don't want to argue this anymore. I'll just agree to disagree :).
Sharpieman
05-25-2005, 02:51 AM
Yeah, once Shaq is gone and replaced by nobody, they won't be title contenders. Yet, the Lakers lose Shaq, and get 2 good players, and they're not even playoff contenders. Do you honestly believe without Wade, the Heat are title contenders?
Regardless, the point still stands. You just don't want to admit it. People talked about him last year as he put up one hell of a fight against the Pacers with Artest guarding him. Shaq isn't the only reason people mention Dwayne Wade.
I just don't want to admit it? I don't care at all. I was debating whether or not I should even post in an NBA thread because the playoffs and this season have been so damn boring. I'm not denying that Wade is a very good player, but Shaq is 10000 times better. You put Shaq with McGrady, Francis, Penny (Penny!!!!!) and that team is a title contender. Shaq is a million more times important to the Heat than Wade is, same goes when Shaq with with the Lakers.
Neon_Chaos
05-25-2005, 05:58 AM
How many rings does Shaq have without Kobe in his team? 0
How many rings does Kobe have without Shaq in his team? 0
End of discussion. Come back when Shaq wins a title with the Heat.
vBulletin v3.6.0, Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.