Buying Forwards: Scoring vs. Passing

[thealmighty]

What sort of forward can I expect to get for $3 million or thereabout? Should I go less on the scoring to get a bit more passing, or more scoring with weak passing?

For example, should I go:

magnificent with weak
brilliant with inad
Hopefully you get the idea.

[damnMikeBrown]

I vote heartly for #1, IF everything else is equal. By that, I mean your cash situation. I consider weak secondaries to be "free" while inad you have to start to sompensate for. So I'd look at it this way...4 levels of passing for $0, or 5 levels for $350k. I'm cheap, and don't worry about 1 level of passing, so I pocket the $$ and move on with the higher scorer(which effects wing attacks WAY too much) that will give higher attack ratings.

[saintjo]

i have always heard that 2 levels of passing make up 1 level of scoring. whether or not that is true, i dont know. but using that, option 1 would be better since the passing is only 1 level difference. it would take a passing of passable before i would go with option 2.

[KevinNU7]

passing only assists the central attack. Meanwhile scoring effects all 3 attack ratings. So therefore, as long as money (i.e. salary) isn't an issue you should always go with the guy with more scoring and less passing

[Raven Hawk]

Go with the Mag scorer. It's always best to buy the higher scoring when you can afford salaries. If we were talking ET vs. Titanic, I'd opt for the higher passing/lower scoring to keep wages under control. But at Brilliant/Mag level, go for the higher scoring rating.

[Havok]

what he said ^^^^

[akickku]

You play with wingers so just load up on the highest scoring you can get. Feels like I'm helping the enemy.

[thealmighty]

Thanks for the input.

akickku, I am not, at least for now, the enemy anymore. :)

[thealmighty]

dola...

of course for saintjo, I can't say the same thing at the moment (though FoG is not much of a threat, either).