Nasty/Controversial

[JFiz]

My question to you vets is just, do you avoice Nasty/Controversial players? Accross the board, everyone says that they avoid Nasty if at all possible. I guess I'm just curious if the people who have played a long time simply NEVER would pick a nasty guy up, or are there some reasons where you don't mind. My co worker just told me he found a real good deal on a player, but he is nasty... is it worth it?

And controversial, is that a problem? I personally have no players of either, but am I limiting myself? Is it better to get a super cheap nasty guy then blowing a ton on a pleasant?

Just looking for more thoughts.

Thanks!!!

[saintjo]

Nasty, and Controversial would only "possibly" affect TS when they are initially purchased or if their leadership is the highest on your team.

As long as they arent Nasty/Controversial with solid leadership, it doesnt matter to me personally.

[Mr. Wednesday]

I have a semi-clown, so I would avoid anybody with solid leadership and lower agreeability than sympathetic.

Other than that... I'd be a little nervous about a TS hit buying a nasty or controversial player, but I wouldn't be concerned about having them on the squad.

[JFiz]

Ahh I see, so there are no lasting effects unless they have solid leadership, because then they would be your Team Leader.

Last two trainees I got were Pleasant and they gave me a TS hit anyway, "off to a bad start" :(

[dacman]

If it's a player you plan on keeping long term, I'd be much more worried about the nasty/controversial player being a card magnent than any short-term team spirit effects.

edit: nevermind, I have controversial confused with tempermental

[saintjo]

nasty/contriversial has nothing to do with cards. it is termperment and honesty level that determines cards and taking dives.

[JFiz]

Cool! Thanks guys.