PDA

View Full Version : NCAA Conference Championship Weekend


Pages : [1] 2

Ben E Lou
12-03-2005, 09:30 AM
I'm quite surprised to see the Dawgs as only 1.5-point underdogs. It seems to me that if we play our very best, and the Tigers play their very best, we lose by at least 7-10 points. Here's hoping LSU continues their turnover woes.

FBPro
12-03-2005, 09:39 AM
I'm quite surprised to see the Dawgs as only 1.5-point underdogs. It seems to me that if we play our very best, and the Tigers play their very best, we lose by at least 7-10 points. Here's hoping LSU continues their turnover woes.
Concur!!

duckman
12-03-2005, 09:41 AM
I hate myself for say this: Go Longhorns!


I'm going to be sick.......

B & B
12-03-2005, 09:41 AM
I'm quite surprised to see the Dawgs as only 1.5-point underdogs. It seems to me that if we play our very best, and the Tigers play their very best, we lose by at least 7-10 points. Here's hoping LSU continues their turnover woes.


Thats the game, in a nutshell. If someone could tell me exactly how many ints Russell is gonna toss, then Id sit back, count my money and take the rest of the year off.

JeeberD
12-03-2005, 09:52 AM
This weekend makes me sad... :(

Coffee Warlord
12-03-2005, 10:07 AM
I hate myself for say this: Go Longhorns!


I'm going to be sick.......

...

DIE.

Joe
12-03-2005, 10:11 AM
What time is the Big 10 championship game on? :(

duckman
12-03-2005, 10:24 AM
This weekend makes me sad... :(
Go Tulsa! :D

JeeberD
12-03-2005, 10:25 AM
Yeah, it would be a moral victory if a team we beat wound up as CUSA champs...

Senator
12-03-2005, 10:26 AM
Visions of the 2001 Big 12 Championship swirl in my head. At least Chrissy isn't our QB for this game.

VPI97
12-03-2005, 10:26 AM
Well, I had tickets to tonight's ACC Championship game, but since my in-laws couldn't keep the kids for the weekend, I'm still in Atlanta. At least I get to watch all the other games.

duckman
12-03-2005, 10:28 AM
Visions of the 2001 Big 12 Championship swirl in my head. At least Chrissy isn't our QB for this game.
I highly doubt it, but it would "Mackish" for this team to choke to a 7-4 division champion.

Swaggs
12-03-2005, 10:42 AM
Thought this was funny and would be appreciated here: College Football Teams as Simpsons (http://heyjennyslater.blogspot.com/)

VPI97
12-03-2005, 11:02 AM
Thought this was funny and would be appreciated here: College Football Teams as Simpsons (http://heyjennyslater.blogspot.com/)http://www.fof-ihof.com/upload/VPI97/accsimpsons.jpg

Dr. Sak
12-03-2005, 11:23 AM
Go Bruins & Buffs!

Galaxy
12-03-2005, 11:53 AM
Navy-Army play?

vtbub
12-03-2005, 11:55 AM
2:30 ET

cthomer5000
12-03-2005, 12:20 PM
Colorado comes out and is putting together the perfect opening drive, then turn it over in Texas territory. Now I bet it's game over by the end of the first quarter.

Celeval
12-03-2005, 12:32 PM
I'm quite surprised to see the Dawgs as only 1.5-point underdogs. It seems to me that if we play our very best, and the Tigers play their very best, we lose by at least 7-10 points. Here's hoping LSU continues their turnover woes. Anyone else think Dawan Landry (FS, Georgia Tech) spent some time with little brother LaRon (FS, LSU) leading up to this week?

st.cronin
12-03-2005, 12:45 PM
Tulsa and UCF are playing a very entertaining game.

cthomer5000
12-03-2005, 01:09 PM
Texas is lucky to have this scrimmage beteween the regular season and the national title game.

vtbub
12-03-2005, 01:20 PM
Unreal. Texas is scary good.

JonInMiddleGA
12-03-2005, 01:21 PM
Unreal. Texas is scary good.

Or is Colorado frightenly mediocre?
(Not entirely a knock on the Buffs either -- doing Top 25's for Cartman's poll all season has made me very aware how few very good or better teams there really are in college football right now)

vtbub
12-03-2005, 01:25 PM
Or is Colorado frightenly mediocre?
(Not entirely a knock on the Buffs either -- doing Top 25's for Cartman's poll all season has made me very aware how few very good or better teams there really are in college football right now)
Nope, Texas is that good and Colorado is below average.

vex
12-03-2005, 01:30 PM
Go TU!

vex
12-03-2005, 01:31 PM
TD!

sooner333
12-03-2005, 01:54 PM
I hate myself for say this: Go Longhorns!


I'm going to be sick.......

Why would you do this...even if it was for the good of the conference, it would have been better for CU to win because the Big 12 would likely have two BCS teams with more money coming in. However, at this point, the point is moot.

JeeberD
12-03-2005, 01:56 PM
What channel is the Texas game on? I can't find it anywhere...

sooner333
12-03-2005, 01:58 PM
What channel is the Texas game on? I can't find it anywhere...

ABC, but its at the half. Although, you are inferring that it is still a "game". I think Colorado just agreed to bring some guys, put them in uniforms, and continue sucking the way they have for the past two weeks. What a lame team.

Senator
12-03-2005, 02:06 PM
Why would you do this...even if it was for the good of the conference, it would have been better for CU to win because the Big 12 would likely have two BCS teams with more money coming in. However, at this point, the point is moot.


I just want one national championship in my lifetime. Please.

sooner333
12-03-2005, 02:08 PM
I just want one national championship in my lifetime. Please.

Can't blame you...this should be the year. I was just saying as an OU fan who feels like they had to root for Texas for the good of the conference was actually doing the wrong thing by pulling for the Horns.

mauchow
12-03-2005, 02:12 PM
real boring game.

Solecismic
12-03-2005, 02:23 PM
I know it's fun to root against the BCS, but it looks like this year, they got us a game that otherwise wouldn't have been possible (of course, UCLA could always make this a very entertaining mess).

cthomer5000
12-03-2005, 02:26 PM
this game is kind of embarassing to watch.

MrBug708
12-03-2005, 02:30 PM
*sigh*

Cuckoo
12-03-2005, 02:31 PM
Can't blame you...this should be the year. I was just saying as an OU fan who feels like they had to root for Texas for the good of the conference was actually doing the wrong thing by pulling for the Horns.

For me personally, as much as it pains me, I'm rooting for Texas for one reason. I want USC to lose. As much as I dislike Texas, I dislike USC more. And I think Texas may be the only team who can beat them.

As to this game, Texas is a very good team. But Colorado is also a very mediocre team, playing steadily worse as the season progressed. Just like last year with OU/Colorado, I didn't expect this to be a game at all.

The problem for Texas is that they haven't been challenged very often this year, which may make them unprepared for the talent that USC has. I hope that's not the case and they can remember back to Ohio State.

MrBug708
12-03-2005, 02:32 PM
This is where Mack needs to show some class and take out everyone of note.

mauchow
12-03-2005, 02:33 PM
Uggghh.... I feel awful for Colorado now. 62-3 with 10 minutes to go...in the 3rd quarter.

I'd just forfiet the 4th quarter if I was them. Running clock starts now, even on time outs; please!

cthomer5000
12-03-2005, 02:35 PM
Texas can hit 100 points if they want to.

mauchow
12-03-2005, 02:35 PM
Okay. My high school team that went 0-7 or whatever this year, could beat this CU team at the second..... Fumble and it's Texas' ball already.....


Ugh.....

GrantDawg
12-03-2005, 02:37 PM
I just hope the SEC championship doesn't look like this.

cthomer5000
12-03-2005, 02:42 PM
what's Colorado's worst loss in history? Texas biggest win?

sooner333
12-03-2005, 02:43 PM
Colorado losing consecutive Big 12 Championship games 112-6.

sooner333
12-03-2005, 02:47 PM
It will be interesting the split between sooner fans rooting for usc or texas. I think USC will lose a game next year, so I'm not worried about the streak. I don't really like usc all that much, and will normally pull against them just because I like the underdog, and I'm not a big Carroll fan. But I don't hate them...I do hate texas. So, I guess I'll be rooting for the Trojans...hopefully they lose so I can root for JoePa.

sooner333
12-03-2005, 02:49 PM
At least Joel Klatt doesn't know his team is down 67 points right now.

MrBug708
12-03-2005, 02:51 PM
The Big-12 is awful this year.

Oklahoma State: 4-7 team with 3 wins coming against Montana State, Arkansas State and Florida Atlantic. Scores? 15-10 over Montana, 23-3 over FA, 20-10 over Arkansas State. I think it is safe to say they aren't a good team

Iowa State: beat Iowa but so does everybody else early in the season, an 11 pt win at home against Illinois State and a 7 pt win at Army

Colorado: besides Texas they have been decent this year beating the OOC powerhouse of New Mexico State..they did squeak by CSU though

Nebraska: Beat the powerhouse of Maine 25-7 in a game that was close throughout, beat Pitt 7-6 and did drub Wake Forest

Mizzou: Whats with Arkansas State? Lost to New Mexico 45-35 but did beat that Troy powerhouse

Kansas: OOC includes FA, Appalachian State and La Tech..yippee. Funny how they lose their first four conference games then destroy Nebraska

K-State: Did beat Marshall by 2 and also Florida International and North Texas..congrats

Texas Tech: Florida International, Sam Houston State, Indiana State. Only loss to Texas..if you ignore that loss to Oklahoma State

Oklahoma: Loss to TCU and UCLA but coincidentally have turned it around against the conference

AM: lost to Clemson, beat Texas State by 13 but hey they beat SMU

Baylor: beat SMU, Samford, Army

Basically if you look, the teams that played decent OOC opponents, which is few, lost and the teams magically built up their record in what I determine to be a terrible conference

Dr. Sak
12-03-2005, 02:53 PM
So, I guess I'll be rooting for the Trojans...hopefully they lose so I can root for JoePa.

And I will get to spend New Years in LA. That sounds a lot better than being in Miami. Plus after the past two years, and going through hell being a Penn State fan, I want this so bad for Joe. Plus I'd like to play Texas. There are quite a few interesting storylines with a PSU/Texas game.

Solecismic
12-03-2005, 02:54 PM
Biggest single-game point totals of the 2005 season:

Texas Tech 80 (Sam Houston State 21, 11/17)
Bowling Green 70 (Temple 7, 11/19)
USC 70 (Arkansas 17, 9/17)
Boise State 70 (Idaho 35, 11/19)

If this game ended right now, it would be the biggest margin of victory in any I-A game this year (the biggest so far is Wisconsin's 65-0 victory over Temple on 9/10).

VPI97
12-03-2005, 02:56 PM
Go Navy!

Their offense is really clicking now.

st.cronin
12-03-2005, 03:01 PM
I think Colorado can still come back.

Cringer
12-03-2005, 03:03 PM
Wow. Woke up, worked out, showered, sat down and turned on Army-Navy. I just flipped up a channel and find Texas up 70-3. I have never felt bad for a major college team before now. This is just sad. Colorado player barely even walking as he goes to the locker room, QB getting nailed still. I almost wish they would call the game off, but then again that would just be worse for the Buffs players.

timmae
12-03-2005, 03:03 PM
Well, I had tickets to tonight's ACC Championship game, but since my in-laws couldn't keep the kids for the weekend, I'm still in Atlanta. At least I get to watch all the other games.

Dude man... you have to be persistent in a case such as this. A man has his needs, no?

Cringer
12-03-2005, 03:08 PM
Well, I had tickets to tonight's ACC Championship game, but since my in-laws couldn't keep the kids for the weekend, I'm still in Atlanta. At least I get to watch all the other games.

That stinks. Wish I had known. I was in GA this week, I could have stopped by, grabbed the tickets, and had a good time at your expense. :D

JW
12-03-2005, 03:09 PM
I'm quite surprised to see the Dawgs as only 1.5-point underdogs. It seems to me that if we play our very best, and the Tigers play their very best, we lose by at least 7-10 points. Here's hoping LSU continues their turnover woes.

It should be a good game. LSU has not shown the ability to pull away from quality opponents. I think LSU should be favored more than 1.5, but I think it will be a close game. After all, it is a 'home' game for Georigia, lol.

But a related factor of interest has been the continual drumbeat that Auburn is the best team in the SEC and that LSU doesn't deserve to be in the SECCG, from several on ESPN, particularly Lou Holtz, who has always disliked LSU, and from some on CBS. They keep pointing to Auburn's missed field goals in that game, as if those are the only factors of importance in the game. Let me give you the rest of the story, FOF fans.

Okay, Auburn missed FGs of 39,40,48 & 51 yards in that game. LSU missed fiedl goals from 28 and 38 yards, both shorter than the shortest Auburn miss, and dropped two touchdown passes. One was a sure catch in the chest, and continued a weekly problem LSU has had w/dropped passes. In fact, that dropped TD pass was followed by the 28-yard field goal miss with LSU up 14-10 late in the 3rd quarter. LSU could easily have been up 21-10 late in the game. Yet Holtz and the others who keep bringing up Auburn's missed FGs never mention LSUs misses and the dropped touchdowns. It is as if LSU played a perfect game and Auburn made all the mistakes in that game.

This doesn't fault Auburn, btw. They have a great team, probably just as good as LSU, but they did not win the SEC West. LSU did.

And this, btw, hurts Georgia, Skydog. Because if Georgia wins, Auburn people and apparently Lou Hotlz and ESPN and CBS are going to be saying that Georgia didn't prove a thing because it didn't beat the best team in the West.

sooner333
12-03-2005, 03:11 PM
Barnett could ask for a running clock like Franccione did down 77-0 to OU in 2003. Bottom line, Colorado 3rd or 4th best team from the North...getting crushed like they should. I just thought they'd put up a better fight.

ISiddiqui
12-03-2005, 03:12 PM
I hate that. Auburn lost! Who cares if they missed FGs... that's part of the game. What, we are now going to say that "Wide Right" never happened and FSU was the best team in those years that they only lost to Miami? Please. They lost, ESPN and CBS need to get over it.

(FTR, I'm neither an Auburn or LSU fan).

JonInMiddleGA
12-03-2005, 03:33 PM
re: UGA vs LSU -- Much as it gags me to say this, I'm honestly surprised that LSU is the favorite in this one given the site. I don't find either team to be particularly impressive but think Georgia has more overall talent + homefield advantage.

That said, it also wouldn't surprise me if LSU won the game in a rout (since Georgia seems to be waiting to have a day like Colorado) but in the fictional "if they played 10 times scenario", I'd expect Georgia to win at least 6 of them (all by less than 10 pts).

BishopMVP
12-03-2005, 03:43 PM
I don't find either team to be particularly impressive but think Georgia has more overall talentI disagree with this. Georgia could well be a better team, but LSU has possibly the most talent in the country top to bottom in terms of future NFL players. (USC's offense is obviously better, but their defense is pretty bad, with Bing the only real good upperclassman.)

Eaglesfan27
12-03-2005, 03:43 PM
Bush already breaking off a great run :)

vex
12-03-2005, 03:47 PM
LSU has possibly the most talent in the country top to bottom in terms of future NFL players.
How do you figure this?

st.cronin
12-03-2005, 03:49 PM
re: UGA vs LSU -- Much as it gags me to say this, I'm honestly surprised that LSU is the favorite in this one given the site. I don't find either team to be particularly impressive but think Georgia has more overall talent + homefield advantage.

That said, it also wouldn't surprise me if LSU won the game in a rout (since Georgia seems to be waiting to have a day like Colorado) but in the fictional "if they played 10 times scenario", I'd expect Georgia to win at least 6 of them (all by less than 10 pts).

I agree in the sense that I don't see a lot of difference in the two teams. I think they're both pretty good.

As far as The Battle of Los Angeles, I don't think enough gets said about the Trojan O-line. Those guys are amazing, definitely the best squad in the country.

Easy Mac
12-03-2005, 03:49 PM
i honestly think keith jackson has no idea what is happening each play.

ISiddiqui
12-03-2005, 03:50 PM
Jebus! If Bush can make runs like that against UCLA, why pass at all today?

vex
12-03-2005, 03:51 PM
i honestly think keith jackson has no idea what is happening each play.
He never does.

Easy Mac
12-03-2005, 03:52 PM
Jebus! If Bush can make runs like that against UCLA, why pass at all today?
I don't know if you saw, or if it was mentioned here, but there is a reggie bush highlight video at the NY TImes... from high school. Some of that stuff, wow.

Link to article (http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/30/sports/ncaafootball/30reggie.html?ex=1291006800&en=f471a3326a2edc52&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss) (video link is below picture on the left)

Eaglesfan27
12-03-2005, 03:53 PM
Sheesh. We shouldn't have gone away from Bush once we got inside the 20. Bush only jad 59 yards on 6 carries. Why give it to him again, why not have Leinart throw 3 passes on a very breezy day?

Chief Rum
12-03-2005, 03:54 PM
Bush is amazing, and because of that USC is still moving the ball pretty well. But it's not helping Leinart yet. UCLA's secondary is still doing a good job sticking with their receivers, and he seems to be a little off right now.

Chief Rum
12-03-2005, 03:55 PM
Give credit tot he Bruins pass D, though. Yeah, they might be ont op of the conference against the pass becuase everyone and their mom runs on them. But that doesn't mean they're bad at it. We have good athletes and experience and are deep there.

ISiddiqui
12-03-2005, 03:56 PM
Wow... Leinhart can't hit the side of a barn in the early going. Just give it to Bush and let him run it down their throats.

Chief Rum
12-03-2005, 03:57 PM
Hmm...I know you don't want Drew to get the ball, but honestly, giving UCLA a start on the 35 every time ain't gonna do SC much good.

Easy Mac
12-03-2005, 03:59 PM
that was a generous spot.

Eaglesfan27
12-03-2005, 03:59 PM
Excellent tackling to stop the receiver from getting the 1st.

I wonder if UCLA risks it in their own turf..

Chief Rum
12-03-2005, 03:59 PM
GO FOR IT!!!

Chief Rum
12-03-2005, 04:00 PM
HAHA! Great run, Drew.

st.cronin
12-03-2005, 04:06 PM
What the hell???? You go for it on 4th down at midfield, and then in USC territory you punt???

I will never understand some coaches.

Eaglesfan27
12-03-2005, 04:08 PM
What the hell???? You go for it on 4th down at midfield, and then in USC territory you punt???

I will never understand some coaches.
To be fair, that second 4th down was much longer than the first one.

st.cronin
12-03-2005, 04:10 PM
To be fair, that second 4th down was much longer than the first one.

I think it took USC one play to get back to where UCLA had the ball on 4th down. It was clearly an idiotic punt, and now they're down 10-0.

Eaglesfan27
12-03-2005, 04:10 PM
Bush just broke 100 yards... in the 1st quarter... with 3:30 left on the clock. 10 carries for about 105 yards.

Eaglesfan27
12-03-2005, 04:11 PM
Leinart to Jarrett for the TD!!!! :) 10-0 USC.

Chief Rum
12-03-2005, 04:12 PM
USC's offense is rolling now.

BTW, I would have gone for the field goal if I were Dorrell. I know it's a risk, but Medlock has a foot on him. Can't go for it on fourth and then get nothing. Horrible playcalling really in that downs following the fourht down conversion. I mean a screen to the FB (which he dropped) and a 2-and-10 run up the middle, against USC's strength? Come on guys go get that secondary! No one on USC can cover Lewis one on one.

Solecismic
12-03-2005, 04:13 PM
So, is Bush worth all the hype? Is he better than LaDanian Tomlinson? The latest PFW quotes a scout as saying he hasn't rated a back this high since Marshall Faulk.

It would kind of be funny if Matt Leinart changed his last name to Kerry. That way we could have more topical Heisman voting.

Easy Mac
12-03-2005, 04:24 PM
wow, 60 yard run and they still couldn't bring him down.

Eaglesfan27
12-03-2005, 04:24 PM
3rd and 10 from their own 2, and Bush busts off about a 60 yard run!

Eaglesfan27
12-03-2005, 04:25 PM
So, is Bush worth all the hype?
Yes!

Chief Rum
12-03-2005, 04:25 PM
lol...amazing.

GrantDawg
12-03-2005, 04:27 PM
And this, btw, hurts Georgia, Skydog. Because if Georgia wins, Auburn people and apparently Lou Hotlz and ESPN and CBS are going to be saying that Georgia didn't prove a thing because it didn't beat the best team in the West.

The day I care what Lou Holtz says is the day I stop watching college sports, because I know I've been taken by a has-been idiot cheater. If "Granny" was good at anything but running dirty programs, he'd still be coaching.

bhlloy
12-03-2005, 04:27 PM
What's the all time record for rushing yards in a D1 game? With Bush needing all the Heisman help he can get after Young's game earlier he's going to get a lot of carries.

Easy Mac
12-03-2005, 04:27 PM
So will Pete Carroll leave his starters in when its 70-3?

Eaglesfan27
12-03-2005, 04:28 PM
Lendell White with a (approximately) 20 yard TD run! 17-0 USC :)

GrantDawg
12-03-2005, 04:30 PM
So, is Bush worth all the hype? Is he better than LaDanian Tomlinson? The latest PFW quotes a scout as saying he hasn't rated a back this high since Marshall Faulk.

It would kind of be funny if Matt Leinart changed his last name to Kerry. That way we could have more topical Heisman voting.
I think Young will be number 2 in voting, though. Too many Bush votes that will not give a second place to a guy on the same team.

As for is he better than LT, that is not a question that can be answered until he is playing on Sundays. The amazing thing about LT is not just his talent, but his durability. Let's see if Bush can handle being a week-end and week-out premier back at the next level.

Easy Mac
12-03-2005, 04:31 PM
Hmm...I know you don't want Drew to get the ball, but honestly, giving UCLA a start on the 35 every time ain't gonna do SC much good.
Seems to be working ok. :)

mauchow
12-03-2005, 04:32 PM
I think Bush wins the Heisman easily.

Chief Rum
12-03-2005, 04:32 PM
Uh oh...getting ugly...

Eaglesfan27
12-03-2005, 04:32 PM
This is going so much better than I even thought it would. Maurice Drew just fumbled the kickoff, and this is looking like it could be a big rout. I'm glad I didn't let the huge spread stop me from making a bet with a co-worker who is a UCLA alum.

Eaglesfan27
12-03-2005, 04:33 PM
I think Bush wins the Heisman easily.
I think so too. Especially if he breaks 300 yards rushing in this game which looks likely.

Easy Mac
12-03-2005, 04:34 PM
I think given UCLA's propensity for making late comebacks, Carroll could legitimately leave his players in when it's 42-0, at least.

Easy Mac
12-03-2005, 04:35 PM
trickeration! trickeration!

Eaglesfan27
12-03-2005, 04:36 PM
That was an ugly pass from Jarrett. I know he wanted to make it easy for Leinart to catch, but darn that was ugly. Least it worked ;)

Ben E Lou
12-03-2005, 04:36 PM
They're just playing with 'em now.

Easy Mac
12-03-2005, 04:37 PM
holy shit, how did he make that jump?

So 14 rushes, 200 yards, 1 td in 20 minutes.

Eaglesfan27
12-03-2005, 04:38 PM
Bush with a very athletic 13 yard TD run! :)

Karlifornia
12-03-2005, 04:38 PM
Touchdown, President Bush.

JeeberD
12-03-2005, 04:38 PM
What's the all time record for rushing yards in a D1 game?


:mad: :mad: :mad:

Joe
12-03-2005, 04:39 PM
UCLA sucks

st.cronin
12-03-2005, 04:39 PM
So, is Bush worth all the hype? Is he better than LaDanian Tomlinson? The latest PFW quotes a scout as saying he hasn't rated a back this high since Marshall Faulk.

It would kind of be funny if Matt Leinart changed his last name to Kerry. That way we could have more topical Heisman voting.

He's very good, and I think he'll be an excellent pro, but I notice that on virtually all of his big runs his offensive line basically knocks the other team out of the stadium. He doesn't break a lot of tackles. So, I think he'll be good, but I suspect he will not be on the same level as LdT and Faulk.

GrantDawg
12-03-2005, 04:39 PM
Again, I hope the SEC championship game doesn't look like this.

Easy Mac
12-03-2005, 04:40 PM
He's very good, and I think he'll be an excellent pro, but I notice that on virtually all of his big runs his offensive line basically knocks the other team out of the stadium. He doesn't break a lot of tackles. So, I think he'll be good, but I suspect he will not be on the same level as LdT and Faulk.
he doesn't break a lot of tackles? Have we been watching the same game? And I'd rather have Barry Sanders than LT or Faulk.

Easy Mac
12-03-2005, 04:40 PM
Post Count
Fixed that for ya.

JeeberD
12-03-2005, 04:42 PM
Fixed that for ya.


Do you even understand what I was trying to convey there?

Eaglesfan27
12-03-2005, 04:42 PM
He's very good, and I think he'll be an excellent pro, but I notice that on virtually all of his big runs his offensive line basically knocks the other team out of the stadium. He doesn't break a lot of tackles. So, I think he'll be good, but I suspect he will not be on the same level as LdT and Faulk.
You haven't watched him much this year than. He stiff arms guys, he jukes guys out, he breaks a lot of tackles.

Easy Mac
12-03-2005, 04:43 PM
Do you even understand what I was trying to convey there?
empathy?

st.cronin
12-03-2005, 04:50 PM
You haven't watched him much this year than. He stiff arms guys, he jukes guys out, he breaks a lot of tackles.

I didn't mean he wasn't capable of breaking tackles. I've seen him do all those things. I agree he's quite good, worthy of a high draft pick. I just am not convinced he's quite a Hall of Famer yet.

st.cronin
12-03-2005, 04:58 PM
dola

My main point is that a lot of the credit that Bush gets properly goes to his O-line, which is just an amazing squad.

Chief Rum
12-03-2005, 04:58 PM
Seems to be working ok. :)

Ha...didn't see this til now. Hopefulyl we'll do a better job of proving this wrong as we go on, but yeah, right now, you're right.

cthomer5000
12-03-2005, 05:05 PM
You haven't watched him much this year than. He stiff arms guys, he jukes guys out, he breaks a lot of tackles. Huh? I think you missed the point there. I think it's clear to all of us that this guy is a rare talent, he's been better at the college level than anyone I can ever recall seeing. But st. cronin's point there was we won't know if he's better than Tomlinson until he's playing on Sundays. If he stays healthy, I think he ends up the best runner we've seen since Sanders, but will probably also be as involved in the passing game as Faulk was in his prime. To me, he's clearly the #1 player in the draft.

Celeval
12-03-2005, 05:11 PM
Early break for UGA to fall on that.

Eaglesfan27
12-03-2005, 05:28 PM
Huh? I think you missed the point there. I think it's clear to all of us that this guy is a rare talent, he's been better at the college level than anyone I can ever recall seeing. But st. cronin's point there was we won't know if he's better than Tomlinson until he's playing on Sundays. If he stays healthy, I think he ends up the best runner we've seen since Sanders, but will probably also be as involved in the passing game as Faulk was in his prime. To me, he's clearly the #1 player in the draft.
I thought his point was that Bush was only doing this well due to his O-Line. That I disagree with. However, I definitely agree that we can't compare him to LT until he does it on the pro level.

MikeVic
12-03-2005, 05:32 PM
229 yards rushing at the half?!?!?!

mauchow
12-03-2005, 05:33 PM
229 yards rushing at the half?!?!?!
Yeah, he sucks.

VPI97
12-03-2005, 05:33 PM
I'm hoping VT makes it 4 for 4 on blowouts this evening.

Celeval
12-03-2005, 05:34 PM
Is LSU playing with ten men on defense, leaving out a corner or a safety or something? Just curious.

Eaglesfan27
12-03-2005, 05:40 PM
I love how well our defense is playing against the alleged "Best Quarterback in the Nation" as they just forced him to fumble and have stopped Olson all day.

VPI97
12-03-2005, 05:41 PM
UGA got robbed on that fumble call.

MizzouRah
12-03-2005, 06:37 PM
What a Rose Bowl it is going to be. Two blowouts, two great teams squaring off in Pasadena.

Everyone keeps saying Texas is the favorite, and I'm a Big 12 homie, but damn USC looks good and they always seem to win the BIG games.

st.cronin
12-03-2005, 06:41 PM
Everyone keeps saying Texas is the favorite...

I don't see it. I think USC should be favored by 7-10 points.

Eaglesfan27
12-03-2005, 06:41 PM
I agree that it looks like a great match-up for the National Championship. I think Texas will give USC all it can handle and it should be a great game. I can't wait to watch it :)

MizzouRah
12-03-2005, 06:41 PM
I don't see it. I think USC should be favored by 7-10 points.
I don't either, but the consensus sees Texas as the better all around team, although after this game.. the USC defense should get some recognition.

Eaglesfan27
12-03-2005, 06:42 PM
Dola -

Lendell White just set the USC Career Record for Rushing TD's with 54. I think like today, USC is going to have to rush the ball very effectively to help keep the defense fresh so they can contain the Texas offense somewhat.

Glengoyne
12-03-2005, 06:45 PM
he doesn't break a lot of tackles? Have we been watching the same game? And I'd rather have Barry Sanders than LT or Faulk.
Yeah....Not me. I saw Barry trot off the field with 15 carries for 12 yards too many times.

Barry was spectacular, but he also went MIA a number of times. I'd have taken Emmit Smith or Thurman Thomas over Barry in their primes. Certainly Faulk, and possibly Tomlinson.

vtbub
12-03-2005, 06:45 PM
By far USC's best game this year.

st.cronin
12-03-2005, 06:46 PM
I think Texas has been no more impressive than OU was last year.

Joe
12-03-2005, 07:22 PM
with a loss today, does LSU get a BCS at-large bid? its guaranteed if they drop no further than #6, right?

Celeval
12-03-2005, 07:24 PM
Noles look strong early.

Easy Mac
12-03-2005, 07:28 PM
with a loss today, does LSU get a BCS at-large bid? its guaranteed if they drop no further than #6, right?
I don't think they should, Ohio State's two losses are far better, and Oregon's only loss was to USC. Note I'm saying I don't think they should, not that they won't... but of course Notre Dame is getting a bid, so it makes sense.

Easy Mac
12-03-2005, 07:41 PM
I think its top 4 for BCS schools, top 6 for everyone else.

cthomer5000
12-03-2005, 07:42 PM
with a loss today, does LSU get a BCS at-large bid? its guaranteed if they drop no further than #6, right?
im pretty positive that the Top 6 stuff only applies to schools in non-BCS conferences.

Easy Mac
12-03-2005, 07:42 PM
damn you time stamp

Joe
12-03-2005, 07:50 PM
well that's good news then. please take Ohio State, BCS

JW
12-03-2005, 08:21 PM
I'm quite surprised to see the Dawgs as only 1.5-point underdogs. It seems to me that if we play our very best, and the Tigers play their very best, we lose by at least 7-10 points. Here's hoping LSU continues their turnover woes.

Congrats on the win. No excuses. Congrats to the SEC Champion Georgia Bulldogs.

oykib
12-03-2005, 08:21 PM
Dola -

Lendell White just set the USC Career Record for Rushing TD's with 54. I think like today, USC is going to have to rush the ball very effectively to help keep the defense fresh so they can contain the Texas offense somewhat.

Isn't the Rose Bowl a month away? I'd think that they'd be plenty rested no matter how much they were on the field today...

GrantDawg
12-03-2005, 08:22 PM
Congrats on the win. No excuses. Congrats to the SEC Champion Georgia Bulldogs.
All I can say is, shocked.

TazFTW
12-03-2005, 08:27 PM
Wow, a Gino Torretta mention.

kingfc22
12-03-2005, 09:01 PM
Those 10 were a piece of cake...

timmynausea
12-03-2005, 09:05 PM
Pat White has two long td runs (65 and 77 yards) as WVU is putting South Florida away, 28-6 in the 4th. I can't believe it's not on tv.

cthomer5000
12-03-2005, 09:09 PM
A live shot of VPI:

http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:GL05p1TG9UQJ:tell.fll.purdue.edu/JapanProj/FLClipart/Medical/sweat.gif
(http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:GL05p1TG9UQJ:tell.fll.purdue.edu/JapanProj/FLClipart/Medical/sweat.gif)

JonInMiddleGA
12-03-2005, 09:14 PM
Well ... doesn't that make things interesting.

cthomer5000
12-03-2005, 09:21 PM
Did Virginia Tech think this was a Miami rematch?

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 09:23 PM
At this point, we could still lose and I would consider this a win. I was expecting a 30-40 point loss.

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 09:41 PM
The clock is freaking CRAWLING!

cartman
12-03-2005, 09:47 PM
Jeebus, Musburger. It's 1st and goal at the 3. A facemask penalty isn't going to change things much.

cthomer5000
12-03-2005, 10:01 PM
I'm sorry to say, but this is really an embarassing performance by Virginia Tech.

vtbub
12-03-2005, 10:05 PM
What a horrible game.

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 10:05 PM
Aside from being speechless, this game actually pisses me off, because there's no reason this team has lost 4 games. None.

cthomer5000
12-03-2005, 10:07 PM
I'm hoping VT makes it 4 for 4 on blowouts this evening.
Be careful what you wish for.

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 10:10 PM
When Kyler Hall is consistently making plays, you know it's FSU's night.

mauchow
12-03-2005, 10:11 PM
So... Florida State gets to the Orange Bowl? What a bunch of B(C)S.

bronconick
12-03-2005, 10:11 PM
When Kyler Hall is consistently making plays, you know it's FSU's night.
I was convinced of that when that WR dropped the wide open touchdown (even discounting the flag)

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 10:13 PM
That's the price you pay for the extra money conferences make by having a championship game. No different than an 11-19 basketball team making the tournament.

Vegas Vic
12-03-2005, 10:15 PM
So... Florida State gets to the Orange Bowl? What a bunch of B(C)S.

It's too bad that South Florida couldn't win their last two games. It would have been priceless to see the look on the face of those pompous asshats in the Orange blazers contemplating a FSU-USF Orange Bowl.

Dr. Sak
12-03-2005, 10:18 PM
So... Florida State gets to the Orange Bowl? What a bunch of B(C)S.

Now they can hype a Paterno vs Bowden Orange Bowl Retirement Match.

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 10:20 PM
FSU is winning by employing the multiple 12 men on the field penalty gameplan.

Easy Mac
12-03-2005, 10:20 PM
That's the price you pay for the extra money conferences make by having a championship game. No different than an 11-19 basketball team making the tournament.
It's more like a 20-10 team, and people normally don't complain if they have a nice run through the tourney.

st.cronin
12-03-2005, 10:22 PM
owwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

that looked painful

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 10:22 PM
There have been several teams with losing seasons get into the tournament - and frankly, that's worse than this (assuming it happens - game ain't over yet).

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 10:24 PM
That looked like a good catch to me.

cthomer5000
12-03-2005, 10:24 PM
2 point conversion looks good to me.

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 10:25 PM
That last replay they showed, I saw separation of the ball from his hand/arm as it came down toward the ground. I think that's why they called it no good.

cthomer5000
12-03-2005, 10:26 PM
huh? I can't see what replay showed the WR not posessing the ball.

General Mike
12-03-2005, 10:27 PM
Fuck the ACC. What an overrated conference.

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 10:29 PM
O- kaaaaaay?

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 10:30 PM
Up by 18, VT finally showing some signs of life...let's go 3 and out and take 2 seconds off the clock!

General Mike
12-03-2005, 10:32 PM
huh? I can't see what replay showed the WR not posessing the ball.

There wasn't conclusive evidence to overturn the call.

mauchow
12-03-2005, 10:32 PM
Could've at least been a sympathy call. I mean, c'mon, the guy got hurt refs.

Vegas Vic
12-03-2005, 10:33 PM
It will be interesting the split between sooner fans rooting for usc or texas.

http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/9071/usccheer3pf.jpg

Fight On!!!

mauchow
12-03-2005, 10:34 PM
Woops. Dropped a touchdown. Underthrew it, but still... gotta score there.

st.cronin
12-03-2005, 10:35 PM
USC's cheerleaders rule.

Dr. Sak
12-03-2005, 10:35 PM
Catch the Fucking ball!!!

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 10:36 PM
Here we go...

mauchow
12-03-2005, 10:37 PM
Pfft. Penalties keeping VT in the game.

MizzouRah
12-03-2005, 10:37 PM
I've watched a few VT games recently and they've never really impressed me much. Vick has a long way to go before he learns to do what his brother did, and maybe never will.

I will say though, like USC, it seems like Florida St. had a great gameplan tonight.

mauchow
12-03-2005, 10:38 PM
Why, oh, why would you spike the ball when you're down by twelve mounting a comeback? Guh.

cthomer5000
12-03-2005, 10:39 PM
There wasn't conclusive evidence to overturn the call.
but the ref stated "There was conclusive evidence to uphold the ruling on the field."

That was a blatant lie, and I personally thought there was conclusive evidence that he caught the ball. Every angle that showed his hands showed him posess it and change hands with it.

st.cronin
12-03-2005, 10:39 PM
I've watched a few VT games recently and they've never really impressed me much. Vick has a long way to go before he learns to do what his brother did, and maybe never will.

I will say though, like USC, it seems like Florida St. had a great gameplan tonight.

I agree. I've felt all year that Vatech & Vick were overrated.

cthomer5000
12-03-2005, 10:41 PM
Why, oh, why would you spike the ball when you're down by twelve mounting a comeback? Guh.
college refs are waaaaay too quick to make that call though.

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 10:41 PM
college refs are waaaaay too quick to make that call though.
Yeah, I don't get it. It's no like he spiked it right at the feet of an FSU player. Since when is an emphatic spike unsportsmanlike?

kingfc22
12-03-2005, 10:41 PM
Should have gone for 1 both times. They would only need a TD and a FG if they had done that.

cthomer5000
12-03-2005, 10:42 PM
by the way, it's the wrong decision to go for 2 there. You hold off on that as long as possible. They have to score another TD anyway, so you go for it next time.

VPI97
12-03-2005, 10:42 PM
This game has been a fucking joke.

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 10:42 PM
College coaches have no idea how to use the 2-point play. I can't believe how many coaches go for two way early in the game if they've missed an extra point. When you'r talking about combinations of scores by 2, 3, 6, and 7 points, you hold off on going for 2 as long as you can.

VPI97
12-03-2005, 10:44 PM
Pfft. Penalties keeping VT in the game.You gotta be shitting me.

mauchow
12-03-2005, 10:44 PM
college refs are waaaaay too quick to make that call though.
I'm pretty sure there is no spiking of any kind allowed in college football.

mauchow
12-03-2005, 10:45 PM
You gotta be shitting me.
Just in this last drive I'm talking. They were the right calls for the most part.

mauchow
12-03-2005, 10:45 PM
Stunning night for the Dawgs. I'm happy, but I can't help but wonder what might have been had Richt called other games as he called this one.
A happier SkyDog?

Ben E Lou
12-03-2005, 10:46 PM
Stunning night for the Dawgs. I'm happy, but I can't help but wonder what might have been had Richt called other games as he called this one.

st.cronin
12-03-2005, 10:46 PM
College coaches have no idea how to use the 2-point play. I can't believe how many coaches go for two way early in the game if they've missed an extra point. When you'r talking about combinations of scores by 2, 3, 6, and 7 points, you hold off on going for 2 as long as you can.

The odds are a little bit different in college; kickers aren't as reliable and the two point conversion rate is higher.

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 10:49 PM
This is why Jeff Bowden sucks. You don't win by playing not to lose. At least freaking try to get 1 or 2 first downs. Just awful play calling, whether or not we win.

cthomer5000
12-03-2005, 10:50 PM
College coaches have no idea how to use the 2-point play. I can't believe how many coaches go for two way early in the game if they've missed an extra point. When you'r talking about combinations of scores by 2, 3, 6, and 7 points, you hold off on going for 2 as long as you can.
the first time was at least debatable, the seoncd time they went for it was flat-out incorrect.

mauchow
12-03-2005, 10:50 PM
Doesn't Dr. Pepper have any better commercials than that? I mean, after the 43rd time of the day, it kind of loses it's charm...if there was any to begin with.

Swaggs
12-03-2005, 10:50 PM
man... time is seriously not moving in this game. It started at 8 PM EST, right?

It is almost midnight and there are still almost 9 minutes left.

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 10:50 PM
the first time was at least debatable, the seoncd time they went for it was flat-out incorrect.Agreed, because the first time would have made it a 2-score game instead of 3. And on the second, you were corect earlier that if you can put off the 2-point try until the next TD, you do so.

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 10:53 PM
OK, let's count how many guys are on the field.

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 10:53 PM
Woooo-hooooo!

cthomer5000
12-03-2005, 10:55 PM
Either the playcalling sucks or Vick sucjs, because they should be tearing FSU up on 7-10 yard routes right now, they're in a prevent defense!

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 10:56 PM
Just take a fucking knee. At least that way, whe you lose 2 yards, you won't risk a fumble. God this is infuriating.

sooner333
12-03-2005, 10:57 PM
Why should you wait as long as possible when you are down by that much with relatively little time to go though (less than a quarter). I know it depends on what the other team does, but at least you know that you will definetly have to do later on in the game, also realizing if you give up another score, you are likely done anyway. I say you figure out what you need to do before the last chance (that way you can speed your offense up accordingly to the situation).

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 10:59 PM
No. You take the 1-point because that makes it an 11 point game, and you can wait to go for 2 on the next TD that you need. Even if you get 2 there and make it a 10-point game, you still need another TD. So you take the sure 1 point first, then wait to go for the 2 later.

Joe
12-03-2005, 11:00 PM
Stunning night for the Dawgs. I'm happy, but I can't help but wonder what might have been had Richt called other games as he called this one.

They'd be undefeated and not in the rose bowl

sooner333
12-03-2005, 11:01 PM
No. You take the 1-point because that makes it an 11 point game, and you can wait to go for 2 on the next TD that you need. Even if you get 2 there and make it a 10-point game, you still need another TD. So you take the sure 1 point first, then wait to go for the 2 later.

Makes sense. You know you have to score at least one more TD, and you would have to score again after that anyway, so then you could gameplan for a FG or a TD at that point. Okay, I'm convinced...haha.

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 11:01 PM
Damn, where has this defense been all year?

bronconick
12-03-2005, 11:05 PM
I hate the three man rush.

Edit: Hell, this is a 2 or 1 man rush.

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 11:06 PM
If you're going to play prevent, though, it's not a bad idea to drop one of the lineman to protect against the scramble or short cross against a guy like Vick.

Swaggs
12-03-2005, 11:10 PM
Vick really has trouble passing against good man-to-man DBs. He kills zones, though.

bronconick
12-03-2005, 11:10 PM
Roughing the passer. Doh.

Swaggs
12-03-2005, 11:12 PM
What year is King? He is a stud.

cthomer5000
12-03-2005, 11:13 PM
i thought the ball hit the ground on that "catch" by King.

Swaggs
12-03-2005, 11:13 PM
Yeah, it looked like the bottom half of the ball was on the ground during the replay. It seems that they pick random plays to review in college...

Vegas Vic
12-03-2005, 11:14 PM
It ain't over yet! Onside kick pending.

ISiddiqui
12-03-2005, 11:16 PM
That's it... FSU wins the ACC! WOW!

Swaggs
12-03-2005, 11:17 PM
where does VPI end up now? Will the Gator Bowl take them over Miami?

kingfc22
12-03-2005, 11:19 PM
Nothing like an unranked team with 4 losses making into a BCS bowl.http://www.operationsports.com/fofc/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif

ISiddiqui
12-03-2005, 11:19 PM
Nothing like an unranked team with 4 losses making into a BCS bowl.http://www.operationsports.com/fofc/images/smilies/rolleyes.gifHey, blame it on the conference championship setup... Well, if anyone deserves this, it's the ACC! LOL!

Swaggs
12-03-2005, 11:20 PM
Nothing like an unranked team with 4 losses making into a BCS bowl.http://www.operationsports.com/fofc/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif

Couldn't happen to a nicer conference.

cthomer5000
12-03-2005, 11:22 PM
where does VPI end up now? Will the Gator Bowl take them over Miami?
I was thinking the same thing. I guess that would leave Viriginia Tech in the Peach Bowl.

VPI97
12-03-2005, 11:22 PM
Damn, where have these refs been all year?Fixed.

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 11:31 PM
Fixed.
:rolleyes:

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 11:33 PM
The refs didn't lose this game for you. If you need an excuse that bad, just go with Beamer/FSU = Schottenheimer/Denver.

VPI97
12-03-2005, 11:34 PM
:rolleyes:I'm just saying that they were calling things extremely loose...if you get a typical set of refs, FSU would have had 2-3 more pass interference calls. They were loose with our secondary, too, but we didn't take advantage of it like we should have by blitzing more and relying on more physical press coverage.


The refs didn't lose this game for you. If you need an excuse that bad, just go with Beamer/FSU = Schottenheimer/Denver.Refs didn't cost us the game...our coaching did. We never adjusted to the appropriate style of play for the game.

cthomer5000
12-03-2005, 11:34 PM
I don't think i saw the same game VPI did. Vick couldn't hit the broad side of a barn, the receivers couldn't catch, the DBs lost out again and again on the deep ball to FSU receivers, and the offensive line was a turnstyle for the FSU d-line... funneling them to their sacks in orderly fasion.

Celeval
12-03-2005, 11:35 PM
I was thinking the same thing. I guess that would leave Viriginia Tech in the Peach Bowl. College Football News predicts:

Gator - Miami
Peach - Virginia Tech
Champs Sports (Orlando) - Clemson
Meineke Car Care (Charlotte) - NC State
MPC Computers (Boise) - Boston College

Music City (Nashville) [From the SEC, not enough qualifiers] - Georgia Tech
Emerald (San Francisco) [From the PAC-10, not enough qualifiers] - Virginia


dola... which sucks, because Peach Bowl officials were saying earlier in the day that if Georgia beat LSU, it'd be a likely GT - UF matchup in the Peach. Instead we get Minnesota or some random Big 10 team.

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 11:37 PM
I was happy to see them calling the plays (correctly) like that in the secondary. They weren't getting there early, they were playing great defense, best game of the year (I don't count Miami because neither team's offense was worth shit that night). You adjust to how they're calling them, you don't sit there and point for a flag every time the ball gets knocked away on close coverage.

VPI97
12-03-2005, 11:39 PM
They weren't getting there early, they were playing great defenseYeah, okay.

ISiddiqui
12-03-2005, 11:39 PM
College Football News predicts:

Gator - Miami
Peach - Virginia Tech
Champs Sports (Orlando) - Clemson
Meineke Car Care (Charlotte) - NC State
MPC Computers (Boise) - Boston College

Music City (Nashville) [From the SEC, not enough qualifiers] - Georgia Tech
Emerald (San Francisco) [From the PAC-10, not enough qualifiers] - Virginia


dola... which sucks, because Peach Bowl officials were saying earlier in the day that if Georgia beat LSU, it'd be a likely GT - UF matchup in the Peach. Instead we get Minnesota or some random Big 10 team.Um... yeah. I'd rather see Virginia Tech v. Florida in the Peach Bowl. You GTech fans can go to Nashville to play... whoever :p.

Swaggs
12-03-2005, 11:39 PM
By the way, I guess Ohio State gets an automatic BCS bid since they will probably be ranked #4, right?

Noop
12-03-2005, 11:40 PM
I am sure glad about this win. Our first week practicing in pads and we return to playing like we gave a damn. In fact we are undefeated when we actually practice in pads. Go Noles!!!!!!!!

VPI97
12-03-2005, 11:41 PM
By the way, I guess Ohio State gets an automatic BCS bid since they will probably be ranked #4, right?Yep...both ND and OSU are locked into the BCS now.

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 11:42 PM
Yeah, okay.Sorry, while I agree there could have been some pass interference calls made - because I see shitty calls like that made way too much on Saturdays - they weren't called tonight and it was the right decision on pretty much every non-call I saw.

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 11:43 PM
I am sure glad about this win. Our first week practicing in pads and we return to playing like we gave a damn. In fact we are undefeated when we actually practice in pads. Go Noles!!!!!!!!
The downside being that this gives Jeff Bowden another year. I guess that's worth $15M?

Noop
12-03-2005, 11:43 PM
The downside being that this gives Jeff Bowden another year. I guess that's worth $15M?
I hope we fire the QB coach though. Oh well I guess I will be at the Orange Bowl this year.

VPI97
12-03-2005, 11:44 PM
Sorry, while I agree there could have been some pass interference calls made - because I see shity calls like that made way too much on Saturdays - they weren't called tonight and it was the right decision on pretty much every non-call I saw.That's becuase you're a FSU fan. As a VT fan, I see the exact opposite. The truth is somewhere in the middle.

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 11:50 PM
The truth is in the reaction from the announcers, fans, and people on the board. I don't really see anyone outraged that the refs took the game away from VT by failing to call multiple obvious pass interference penalties. That's because they by and large didn't happen.

Ksyrup
12-03-2005, 11:50 PM
I hope we fire the QB coach though. Oh well I guess I will be at the Orange Bowl this year.
I think that's the guy who used to coach Presbyterian College. I went there for a year.

VPI97
12-03-2005, 11:52 PM
The truth is in the reaction from the announcers, fans, and people on the board. I don't really see anyone outraged that the refs took the game away from VT by failing to call multiple obvious pass interference penalties. That's because they by and large didn't happen.Whatever you say.

TazFTW
12-04-2005, 03:45 AM
And in nothing to do with conference championship games news, Hawaii beat San Diego State 49-38. What was noteworthy was that Hawaii ran the ball 39 times for 262 yards. :eek:

Nate Ilaoa ran the ball 15 times for 151 yards and a TD, first time a UH RB had a 100+ yard game. Reagan Mauia ran 10 times for 56 yards and a score. That is interesting because Mauia is a 6' 360lb defensive tackle that June Jones has been using as a RB the past two games.

Smash mouth football!

GrantDawg
12-04-2005, 05:15 AM
College Football News predicts:

Gator - Miami
Peach - Virginia Tech
Champs Sports (Orlando) - Clemson
Meineke Car Care (Charlotte) - NC State
MPC Computers (Boise) - Boston College

Music City (Nashville) [From the SEC, not enough qualifiers] - Georgia Tech
Emerald (San Francisco) [From the PAC-10, not enough qualifiers] - Virginia


dola... which sucks, because Peach Bowl officials were saying earlier in the day that if Georgia beat LSU, it'd be a likely GT - UF matchup in the Peach. Instead we get Minnesota or some random Big 10 team.
Really? They said in the game that the looser of the SEC championship game would be going to the Peach. They showed the SEC bowl connections, and they had Peach as third. Now I thought they were fourth, which would then make sense for Florida to be Peach bound. But if that graphic was right and it they are third, then LSU > Florida easily.

Celeval
12-04-2005, 07:44 AM
Really? They said in the game that the looser of the SEC championship game would be going to the Peach. They showed the SEC bowl connections, and they had Peach as third. Now I thought they were fourth, which would then make sense for Florida to be Peach bound. But if that graphic was right and it they are third, then LSU > Florida easily.
Dunno the math of it... perhaps they thought bringing LSU to Atlanta again wouldn't be the best bet? I was focused on the Tech part. ;)

SirFozzie
12-04-2005, 08:15 AM
College Football News predicts:
MPC Computers (Boise) - Boston College


That fucking sucks. I mean, BC beats the teams ahead of them, finishes ahead of them in the standings, but they get sent to higher paying/better location bowls?

cthomer5000
12-04-2005, 08:47 AM
That fucking sucks. I mean, BC beats the teams ahead of them, finishes ahead of them in the standings, but they get sent to higher paying/better location bowls?
That's interesting. I know in the Big East, a bowl would be forced to take BC over NC State by virtue of finishing 2 games ahead of them in conference play. I guess the same doesn't hold true in the ACC?

Celeval
12-04-2005, 09:02 AM
It only holds true for the Gator and Peach bowls. The big f*d up one is NC State - Charlotte has basically said that they want State because of the draw despite who else was available. The question is if the ACC can (and will) lean hard enough on them to take BC instead.

JonInMiddleGA
12-04-2005, 09:50 AM
That fucking sucks. I mean, BC beats the teams ahead of them, finishes ahead of them in the standings, but they get sent to higher paying/better location bowls?

Yep, because the others have done their hitch in Boise, and everybody (except BC I guess) wants somebody who hasn't been there to go.

JeeberD
12-04-2005, 10:13 AM
That fucking sucks. I mean, BC beats the teams ahead of them, finishes ahead of them in the standings, but they get sent to higher paying/better location bowls?

Same thing (kinda) happened in CUSA. UCF fans are pissed because the #2 CUSA bowl is the GMAC Bowl, but before the championship game UTEP agreed to go to the game, sending #2 UCF to Fort Worth. Of course, UTEP fans are pissed about this as well because traveling to Mobile is going to be a bitch while traveling to Fort Worth to face a Big 12 team would have been easier and a better game to watch.