gstelmack
12-09-2005, 10:10 AM
A month after TIVO-ing it off TNT, I finally got to watch the movie "Rules of Engagement". And while in general I thought the movie was decent, dealing well with how the rules change when in combat, I was left feeling dissatisfied with how they handled a key part of the story.
**** Spoiler Warning ****
I was very disappointed that they cut off the story about the video tape evidence. It seemed like Tommy Lee Jones does a good job hammering the State Department about the tape, he visits the NSA right before the trial verdict to threaten him, then they give the verdict, and the movie ends with the note that the Ambassador was found guilty of perjury and the NSA was found guilty of destroying evidence. Nothing really in between. I felt like there was a big part of the story about either proving more about what happened with the tape, or someone besides Tommy Lee acknowledging the tape problem, or the NSA assistant who delivered the tape early in the movie stepping forward, or the ambassador's son going on the stand, or SOMETHING.
So my big question is: did TNT leave out a key scene or two in the interests of time compression for TV? Is this all going to make more sense if I watch the DVD? Or did the release movie really do that poor a job of tying up the "proving what actually happened" end of the story?
**** Spoiler Warning ****
I was very disappointed that they cut off the story about the video tape evidence. It seemed like Tommy Lee Jones does a good job hammering the State Department about the tape, he visits the NSA right before the trial verdict to threaten him, then they give the verdict, and the movie ends with the note that the Ambassador was found guilty of perjury and the NSA was found guilty of destroying evidence. Nothing really in between. I felt like there was a big part of the story about either proving more about what happened with the tape, or someone besides Tommy Lee acknowledging the tape problem, or the NSA assistant who delivered the tape early in the movie stepping forward, or the ambassador's son going on the stand, or SOMETHING.
So my big question is: did TNT leave out a key scene or two in the interests of time compression for TV? Is this all going to make more sense if I watch the DVD? Or did the release movie really do that poor a job of tying up the "proving what actually happened" end of the story?