PDA

View Full Version : Baseball Reaches Tentative Labor Agreement


sterlingice
10-22-2006, 09:49 PM
AP NewsBreak: Players and owners reach tentative agreement on new labor contact
By RONALD BLUM, AP Baseball Writer
October 22, 2006

DETROIT (AP) -- Baseball players and owners set aside their long history of bitter negotiations to reach a tentative agreement on a five-year contract, the first time the sides have achieved labor peace before their current deal expires.

The agreement was struck during bargaining in New York on Friday night and Saturday, and is subject to the sides putting the deal in writing, a person with knowledge of the negotiations told The Associated Press on Sunday. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the agreement had not been finalized.

The current deal, set to expire Dec. 19, was agreed to on Aug. 30, 2002, just hours before players were set to strike. That contract was the first since 1970 achieved without a work stoppage, and this marks the first time the sides reached agreement before the expiration of the previous contract.

"Baseball is at an all-time high point right now," Detroit left fielder Craig Monroe said before Game 2 of the World Series. "You've got low-market teams doing well and different teams winning every year. Getting this done couldn't have come at a better time."

Lawyers were working on drafting language for the new deal Sunday, and hoped to put the finishing touches on it Monday or Tuesday. Once that happened, commissioner Bud Selig would announce it in St. Louis at the World Series.

"You've got a city like Detroit, you've got a city like St. Louis enjoying this, and it would be neat to get something finalized because it's good for the game," Chicago White Sox designated hitter Jim Thome said.

Bob DuPuy, baseball's chief operating officer, and union head Donald Fehr declined comment.

While baseball had eight work stoppages from 1972-95, the new deal guarantees labor peace through the 2011 season.

"Everybody's pretty happy with the industry. In baseball, everybody's making out pretty well," Cardinals reliever Jason Isringhausen said.

Since baseball's first labor contract in 1968, there have been strikes in 1972, 1980, 1981, 1985 and 1994-95, and management lockouts in 1973, 1976 and 1990. The last strike lasted 7 1/2 months and wiped out the World Series for the first time in 90 years, and for many teams it took years to rebuild attendance.

Most of the key provisions of the current contract will be continued with minor modifications, such as revenue sharing and the luxury tax. With the luxury tax set to expire on Dec. 19, there was pressure on management to make a deal to ensure that the 2007 season would be played with the tax in place.

"I think we're all for certainty and not going through a winter of wondering what's going to be going on," Cardinals manager Tony La Russa said. "I applaud the powers with the union and the MLB. Helps us go about our business."

Following the last work stoppage, the sides reached a landmark labor agreement in 1997 that increased revenue sharing, and their 2002 deal boosted the amount of money large-market teams give to their competitors.

Record economic success helped produce an agreement with no public rancor. Commissioner Bud Selig said last week that he estimated the sport will produce $5.2 billion in revenue this year, up from about $3.6 billion in 2001.

Major league teams drew a record 76 million fans this year.

"With the amount of fans coming out with their support," Detroit center fielder Curtis Granderson said, "a strike would've been devastating."

Granderson was 13 when players struck in 1994, and he vividly recalls the aftermath.

"Nobody really talked about baseball too much," he said.

Selig credited the changes in the 2002 agreement with making more teams competitive.

"I had dreams of things getting better but, no, in many ways this has exceeded my fondest expectations," he said last Tuesday night in St. Louis. "This sport has more parity than ever. We have more parity than any other sport."

An agreement had been anticipated by officials on both sides in recent days.

"This is a setting of success. It's a platform, a stage that's been built through very difficult times," agent Scott Boras said Sunday. "To do anything to alter that success would be something that wouldn't be in the best interests of the game."

The huge influx of money smoothed negotiations. The average player salary was $1.1 million in 1995, the first season after the 1994-95 strike. It rose to just under $2.3 million in 2002 and will be about $2.7 million this year. The average likely will top $3 million next year or in 2008.

Still, the very top of the salary scale has stayed the same since Alex Rodriguez signed his record $252 million, 10-year contract with Texas before the 2001 season. And in a sign that spending doesn't translate into postseason success, the New York Yankees failed to advance past the opening round of the playoffs in 2005 and 2006 despite a $200 million annual payroll.

"The business of baseball is being operated much more efficiently," said Boras, who negotiated Rodriguez's deal. "Owners are becoming better owners. League officials are becoming more aware of the opportunity for content both nationally and internationally. The force of the revenue streams basically put the collective bargaining process into a different framework than it's been in the past."

An AP-AOL Sports poll released Thursday shows that only one-third of Americans call themselves fans of professional baseball -- about the level of support for the last decade, but lower than 1990 among all Americans. Skyrocketing salaries were identified as the biggest problem in baseball by more poll respondents -- 28 percent -- than any other. Twenty-one percent said it was the high cost of attending games and 19 percent said it was players using steroids and performance-enhancing drugs.

AP Baseball Writer Mike Fitzpatrick and AP Sports Writer Larry Lage contributed to this report.

Hm... there's both good and bad here. It's great to see such a "ho-hum" announcement- both sides agreeing with little fanfare. I wouldn't mind some positive pub for baseball but I guess no negative news is the next best thing.

There badly needs to be a revamped draft and I don't see anything like that here. First, slotted draft money is a must. Considering the level of attrition in the minors, small market teams just can't afford to make a $5M draft mistake. Also, no more agents holding the worst teams hostage for that kind of money to try and get them to better teams. The worst teams should get the best picks- that's how a draft works.

Then there's the international draft issue. All those "spend money on development" people fail to realize that it's getting really expensive to do development nowadays- it's not like the Yankees or Red Sox are sitting on their hands- they're creating an arms race in the Dominican and elsewhere so that lower market teams who have tried to get an edge there are losing it. I forget who (I think it was Jayson Stark) who had a list of 10 Yankee millionaires from elsewhere in the world who no one had ever heard of because they never made it to the majors. And stories like (http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2508432) this are going to be more and more common.

SI

McSweeny
10-22-2006, 10:15 PM
in regards to fixing the draft, i think they've taken a big step forward in getting rid of the draft pick compensation for signing free agents.

i've also heard rumblings about a possible slotting system for bonus money paid to draft picks

oykib
10-22-2006, 10:29 PM
in regards to fixing the draft, i think they've taken a big step forward in getting rid of the draft pick compensation for signing free agents.

i've also heard rumblings about a possible slotting system for bonus money paid to draft picks

I totally disagree. Compensation was the only thing that kept small-market teams from getting held up in deadline deals involving their players in walk years. Before, you could hold on to the guy and get two draft picks instead of giving him up for shitty prospects. Now, you just have to take what you can get.

What they really need to do is allow the trading of draft picks. Although, a slotted system would be good for all the teams.

SackAttack
10-24-2006, 10:36 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2637615

That 'must sign by August 15' bit has me wondering.

What is that, the deadline is set earlier so that they can't use the start of school as leverage to get a deal done, or if they get drafted they MUST sign by 8/15 and can't re-enter the draft? That's not explained so well.

Ksyrup
10-25-2006, 06:49 AM
Isn't this last week's news?

sterlingice
10-25-2006, 07:30 AM
Now that the details are out, this is even more disappointing than expected. All of the teams are going to be back below the luxury tax threshhold with the exception of the Yankees but with the grossly inflating threshhold, even they will be able to sneak under it one of these years and get rid of any penalties.

After the rumors of draft slotting, nothing came of that. Nor is there the ability to trade picks. Nor is there any international player draft changes. The "player must sign by August 15th" doesn't seem to mean anything at all- sure, it means there won't be as many holdouts lasting into the next spring but all it does is push the deadline of making a possible deal and, frankly, gives the draftees more flexibility than the teams. "Oh, good, now I know you can't sign me so it's off to the international league for me".

The only good thing about the new draft despite MLB.com calling it a "revamped draft" is that clubs now have a little leverage because if a player doesn't sign, they get a compensatory pick in the next year's draft that is the same (ie if they pick 1.3 this year and the player doesn't sign, they get 1.3A next year). However I can already see that being abused- in a weak draft year, a team can just pick a player they don't want to sign, not offer him anything, and wait until the next year when the draft is stronger.

Rule V goes from 3/4 years to 4/5 years- not quite sure how I feel about that yet.

Oh, yeah, and after all of the sound and fury over steroid testing- nothing at all was done. But don't worry- Fehr said if a urine test is developed for HGH, the players would be all over it. Right...

SI