Barkeep49
02-26-2003, 06:06 PM
Check out this article (http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=274155) which talks about the fuss over a sculpture of an ice penis at Harvard. I think about two things on this one.
I understand the women's point of view to a certain extent but at least at my campus I am bombarded with regular chalkings where the womyn's group tries to reclaim the use of the word c*nt. Now I don't know what its like at Harvard but if someone put that statue up on campus and it was torn down for the reasons in the article I'd be offended because of what I see as a double standard. At the same time I'm not sure that they don't have a right to be offended. Looking at Blackadar's work place is an example where such things can create a culture that is negative.
But what really galls me is this idea that the Washington monument and missiles and the like are phallic symbols. Does this make pens and pencils phallic symbols as well and those opressive to women?
I understand the women's point of view to a certain extent but at least at my campus I am bombarded with regular chalkings where the womyn's group tries to reclaim the use of the word c*nt. Now I don't know what its like at Harvard but if someone put that statue up on campus and it was torn down for the reasons in the article I'd be offended because of what I see as a double standard. At the same time I'm not sure that they don't have a right to be offended. Looking at Blackadar's work place is an example where such things can create a culture that is negative.
But what really galls me is this idea that the Washington monument and missiles and the like are phallic symbols. Does this make pens and pencils phallic symbols as well and those opressive to women?