PDA

View Full Version : To Catch a Predator - Over the Line or Legit?


Ksyrup
06-28-2007, 02:40 PM
We had a lively debate a few months ago about this program on another board, and now that this story has come out, I'm sure the debate will flare up again. I hadn't heard anything about the suicide until this story came out, which is surprising given the facts.



Jun 28, 1:57 PM EDT


Texas Town Roiled by NBC Sting

By GRANT SLATER
Associated Press Writer

MURPHY, Texas (AP) -- A sting in which police teamed up with "Dateline NBC" to catch online pedophiles was supposed to send a flinty-eyed, Texas-style warning about this Dallas suburb: Don't mess with Murphy.

Instead, it has turned into a fiasco.

One of the 25 men caught in the sting - a prosecutor from a neighboring county - committed suicide when police came to arrest him. The Murphy city manager who approved the operation lost his job in the ensuing furor.

And the district attorney is refusing to prosecute any of the men, saying many of the cases were tainted by the involvement of amateurs.

"Certainly these people should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, but the fact that this was all done for television cameras raises some questions," said Mayor Bret Baldwin.

It is the first time in nine "Dateline NBC: To Catch a Predator" stings across the country in the past year and a half that prosecutors did not pursue charges.

"Dateline" has made prime-time entertainment out of contacting would-be child molesters over the Internet, luring them to a meeting place, and videotaping their humiliating confrontations with reporter Chris Hansen.

"Dateline" works with an activist group called Perverted Justice, which supplies adults who troll Internet chat rooms, posing as underage boys and girls, and try to collect incriminating sex talk.

City manager Craig Sherwood approved such an operation in this well-to-do community of 11,000 after being approached by "Dateline" and Perverted Justice, but he never informed the mayor or the City Council. He said secrecy was necessary for the sting to be effective.

Over four days in November, 24 men were arrested at a two-story home in one of Murphy's newer neighborhoods after allegedly arranging to meet boys or girls there.

Some other suspects contacted Perverted Justice decoys online but never showed up at the house. Among them was Louis Conradt Jr., an assistant prosecutor from neighboring Kauffman County, who allegedly engaged in a sexually explicit online chat with an adult posing as a 13-year-old boy.

As police knocked at his door and a "Dateline" camera crew waited in the street, Conradt shot himself.

His sister, Patricia Conradt, told the City Council that police acted as "a judge, jury and executioner that was encouraged by an out-of-control reality show."

Then, last month, Collin County District Attorney John Roach dropped all charges. He said that in 16 of the cases, he had no jurisdiction, since neither the suspects nor the decoys were in the county during the online chats.

As for the rest of the cases, he said neither police nor NBC could guarantee the chat logs were authentic and complete.

"The fact that somebody besides police officers were involved is what makes this case bad," said Roach, who was informed of the sting in advance but did not participate. "If professionals had been running the show, they would have done a much better job rather than being at the beck and call of outsiders."

As details of the suicide emerged, Murphy's mayor, City Council and most of its residents learned for the first time that potential molesters were being luring to their city. Many were furious.

"They can chase predators all they want, but they shouldn't do it in a populated area with children, two blocks from an elementary school," said Lisa Watson, 33, who lives down the road from the sting house and has three children and another on the way.

Bryan Whorton, who lives with his wife and baby across the street from the house, said his neighborhood was put in danger. Cars sped up and down the street and police sprinted from hiding spots, guns drawn, to arrest suspects, he said. One suspect dropped a bag of crack, Whorton said.

"This is a family community. It didn't look kosher at all," he said.

Two weeks ago, the City Council voted to buy out the city manager's contract for $255,000.

NBC's Hansen said Murphy is the only place the show has encountered such resistance.

"I don't want to get involved in the DA's business or the police business," he said. "I can tell you in the other locations, these issues did not come up."

Eric Nichols, a Texas deputy attorney general, said that when law enforcement authorities pull an Internet sex sting, officers posing as decoys follow strict rules. Detailed chat logs are kept to ensure that "sex talk" is initiated by the potential predator. That way, a defendant cannot claim entrapment.

Eric Chase, a defense attorney specializing in sex crimes, said stings are the job of police, not TV crews. "Police should not be abdicating a very important function to either private organizations or entertainment organizations," he said.

Crapshoot
06-28-2007, 02:43 PM
As long as you have an audience idiotic enough to watch this crap, people will continue to push this in the name of "edginess." Don't know what else there is to say.

Ksyrup
06-28-2007, 02:52 PM
Well, I'm thinking more in terms of the legal ramifications/complications involved with prosecuting cases based on investigations and acts undertaken by a TV network. I agree as to the TV aspect of this, but I wonder whether the legal position is going to be that this is of limited use. I wonder what the outcomes were in the cases already filed in other cities.

Crapshoot
06-28-2007, 02:58 PM
Well, I'm thinking more in terms of the legal ramifications/complications involved with prosecuting cases based on investigations and acts undertaken by a TV network. I agree as to the TV aspect of this, but I wonder whether the legal position is going to be that this is of limited use. I wonder what the outcomes were in the cases already filed in other cities.

I don't think I'm qualified enough to make that judgment - I imagine you, John Galt, Digamma and a couple of others could figure that out. :D

On a personal level - yeah, I find it awfully sleazy. This may be tantamount to heresy, but inducing someone to commit a crime (aka entrapment) when they haven't shown themselves to be a threat doesn't strike me as particularly kosher. We've all got a little bit of evil in us - encouraging it for TV is a particularly heinous way, IMO>

BrianD
06-28-2007, 03:00 PM
I would think that if the TV show people had any interest in the legal side of these issues, they would partner with law enforcement to make sure they get their stories and the police get the criminals. Leaving law enforcement out means that either they were dumb, or they just wanted the sensational story and had no interest in getting these predators off the streets.

BrianD
06-28-2007, 03:02 PM
On a personal level - yeah, I find it awfully sleazy. This may be tantamount to heresy, but inducing someone to commit a crime (aka entrapment) when they haven't shown themselves to be a threat doesn't strike me as particularly kosher. We've all got a little bit of evil in us - encouraging it for TV is a particularly heinous way, IMO>

If they are posing as children and are playing along until the predators try to arrange a meeting, I'm OK with the sting. This seems different than entrapment.

gstelmack
06-28-2007, 03:18 PM
I would think that if the TV show people had any interest in the legal side of these issues, they would partner with law enforcement to make sure they get their stories and the police get the criminals. Leaving law enforcement out means that either they were dumb, or they just wanted the sensational story and had no interest in getting these predators off the streets.

Where does it say they left them out? Even the neighbors pointed out that the cops were there to jump out of the bushes. And the police went to arrest the other guy. And they partnered with a group that does this regularly.

MikeVic
06-28-2007, 03:20 PM
Where does it say they left them out? Even the neighbors pointed out that the cops were there to jump out of the bushes. And the police went to arrest the other guy. And they partnered with a group that does this regularly.

I've never watched this show, but do they literally "jump out of the bushes?"

BrianD
06-28-2007, 03:48 PM
Where does it say they left them out? Even the neighbors pointed out that the cops were there to jump out of the bushes. And the police went to arrest the other guy. And they partnered with a group that does this regularly.

I suppose saying that the police weren't involved isn't accurate, I missed it during the first read. I would like to think though, that having the police leading the show wouldn't have resulted in jurisdictional issues. The fact that this lead to arrests and a suicide doesn't bother me. It does bother me that they went through all of this and then couldn't go after convictions.

JediKooter
06-28-2007, 06:31 PM
I've never watched this show, but do they literally "jump out of the bushes?"

Yes, and some are actually dressed up like bushes...seriously.

billethius
06-28-2007, 07:15 PM
It's not entrapment. The people posing as teenagers never start the conversations. They never broach the subject of sex, and they certainly never invite the guys over. The guys who get caught doing this deserve to get caught and it's unfortunate that the idiots from this hick town are more interested in protecting their own than actually protecting their children.

Lathum
06-28-2007, 10:30 PM
As long as you have an audience idiotic enough to watch this crap, people will continue to push this in the name of "edginess." Don't know what else there is to say.

you must be joking?

if this show deters one person from molesting a young child then I am all for it.

have you ever even watched this show?

Anthony
06-28-2007, 10:33 PM
Yes, and some are actually dressed up like bushes...seriously.

but the bigger question is do they dress up like car seats, too?

http://www.weirdnewstoday.com/uploaded_images/disguised-as-a-car-seat-723637.jpg

ISiddiqui
06-28-2007, 10:59 PM
It's not entrapment. The people posing as teenagers never start the conversations. They never broach the subject of sex, and they certainly never invite the guys over. The guys who get caught doing this deserve to get caught and it's unfortunate that the idiots from this hick town are more interested in protecting their own than actually protecting their children.

Uh... the "who started the conversations" is part of the problem. As the article said, neither the cops nor NBC could guarentee that the chat logs they gave were accurate or complete. When they can't even guarentee their accuracy of the chat logs handed over, how can a prosecutor be sure that they didn't initiate the conversations?

clintl
06-28-2007, 11:05 PM
Uh... the "who started the conversations" is part of the problem. As the article said, neither the cops nor NBC could guarentee that the chat logs they gave were accurate or complete. When they can't even guarentee their accuracy of the chat logs handed over, how can a prosecutor be sure that they didn't initiate the conversations?

Yeah, this is a problem. A big one.

Vinatieri for Prez
06-29-2007, 12:01 AM
The problem is that the police are involved only in the arrest at the home. The amateurs are involved in the chats and the luring of the suspects. That's why it does in fact create problems for conviction. With that said, absent the amateurs, the police would not have the manpower to do the luring to begin with. So, if you lose some convictions, it's ones you probably never would have gotten anyways.

Now, with that said, I stopped watching the show after the first one. I found it to be just dumb television to watch.

Eaglesfan27
06-29-2007, 08:44 AM
I don't think I'm qualified enough to make that judgment - I imagine you, John Galt, Digamma and a couple of others could figure that out. :D

On a personal level - yeah, I find it awfully sleazy. This may be tantamount to heresy, but inducing someone to commit a crime (aka entrapment) when they haven't shown themselves to be a threat doesn't strike me as particularly kosher. We've all got a little bit of evil in us - encouraging it for TV is a particularly heinous way, IMO>


I agree that we all have a bit of evil in us, but this isn't a bit of evil. These are sick pedophiles who are actively seeking out sexual contact with kids. I have no problem with "inducing" them to commit a crime because I think these pedophiles would be doing this whether this show "enticed" them or not. I do have a major problem with the show if it is tainting the legal cases against these pedophiles.

Ksyrup
06-29-2007, 08:53 AM
Yeah, legally, if you've got a proof problem with regard to the underlying contact, that's an issue. That's why I'm interested in the outcome of the previous cases. I wonder how many have been charged, and out of those, how many have simply pleaded out as opposed to going to trial, and whether any of their attorneys have even tried to make a big deal about the entrapment issue - or simply challenged the online chat "evidence" at all. You'd think a fairly compelling case could be made that there isn't proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" of what went on in the chats, considering they were staged by a TV show and an organization looking to make a name for itself by catching pedophiles. And if law enforcement has to admit that they weren't involved and there was no chain of evidence for the chat transcripts and they can't stand behind them...perhaps what this show is doing is putting predators on notice of what NOT to do, but ultimately giving them a free shot. I don't know. Do they ever update the cases of anyone they've caught? Maybe they all plead out and don't even attempt to challenge.

Mustang
06-29-2007, 09:06 AM
For the guys that get caught, eh.. whatever but, I guess my main issue with the show is that for them, pedophiles = ratings. Call me incredibly pessimistic but, if all the pedophiles were wiped out from the face of the earth tomorrow, I can't help but to believe that the network execs would be a little upset that they lose out on TV ratings

Young Drachma
06-29-2007, 09:13 AM
Having worked in 'big media' before and seeing the sadness on the faces of editors and such when nothing 'major' happens, I would think they'd go to the lengths of creating news stories if there were nothing bad happening.

Young Drachma
06-29-2007, 09:13 AM
As for this show, meh. These guys are morons.

Ksyrup
06-29-2007, 09:27 AM
Obviously they would never show it, and I'm sure there's nothing to see (but maybe hear?), but I'm wondering what kind of footage exists of the guy who goes back into the house and commits suicide.

JediKooter
06-29-2007, 12:21 PM
but the bigger question is do they dress up like car seats, too?

http://www.weirdnewstoday.com/uploaded_images/disguised-as-a-car-seat-723637.jpg


He would have been more inconspicuous if he was a seat belt. But, I've never seen them dressed up as a car seat on that show.

Ksyrup
06-29-2007, 12:23 PM
Is that a broken spring or are you just glad to see me?

Desnudo
06-29-2007, 12:24 PM
I agree that we all have a bit of evil in us, but this isn't a bit of evil. These are sick pedophiles who are actively seeking out sexual contact with kids. I have no problem with "inducing" them to commit a crime because I think these pedophiles would be doing this whether this show "enticed" them or not. I do have a major problem with the show if it is tainting the legal cases against these pedophiles.

If they were inducing people to run red lights or cheat on their taxes, that's one thing. These people are already treading a thin line by frequenting chat rooms that are clearly not intended for their use. I just don't see how you can argue the entrapment angle for this type crime.

I say flush out as many as you can.

Anthony
06-29-2007, 12:30 PM
Is that a broken spring or are you just glad to see me?

that is my favorite internet picture of all time.