Players getting subbed to early and often in 6.3?

[neromadrid]

I'm seeing my top WRs getting a lot fewer looks, namely because they're not on the field as often.

In two leagues my FLs have 70+ endurance but I'm seeing their backups getting just as many plays.

I've checked everything, playing time, depth charts, formation use, personnel but everything is as it should be.

I've noticed this with other positions as well, just not as often. Where it most drives me crazy is with my top wideouts.

Anyone know anything about player use with respect to endurance in 6.3?

[Dutch]

I don't know if this is a good way to answer this question but I can offer this as a clue if nothing else. This screen would seem to indicate that targets are not down by top receiver. Here is the record books from a universe from 2007-2012 where 2012 is the lone v6.3 season. I would argue that if targets were down for WR1, then they wouldn't be challenging the top rankings here. But they clearly are and hold 3 of the top 10 spots along with the #1 spot.

And damnit, where is the ranking column for Almanac screens? Haven't we been asking for that column for about 7 years now...how hard is it to add that???

http://www.explodinghouse.net/fof/targets.png

[gstelmack]

Did you mess around with formations? If you do 3-WR a lot and have your FL2 in the 3-WR, he'll see the field a lot.

[neromadrid]

Did you mess around with formations? If you do 3-WR a lot and have your FL2 in the 3-WR, he'll see the field a lot.

I do use a lot of 3 wides but both of my teams use the SE2 as the 3rd WR and I'm seeing way too many plays for FL2.

[Celeval]

I do use a lot of 3 wides but both of my teams use the SE2 as the 3rd WR and I'm seeing way too many plays for FL2.

What's the percentage of FL1 pass plays to total pass plays?

[Ben E Lou]

I just ran some full-season tests on this and I'm not seeing anything unusual about WR usage. Getting 70-75% participation on medium endurance guys, and up around 90% on high endurance.